Wild Bill For America Arrested In Canada For “Smuggling Hate Speech” On His IPAD….here is Bill’s video report on what happened.


Published on 25 Jun 2017: Smuggler Bill’s Canada Blues  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwaMpTLUmX0

June 24 2017
AMERICAN SPEAKER ARRESTED AT CALGARY AIRPORT FOR SMUGGLING HATE SPEECH ON HIS IPAD. Upon Arrival at Calgary Airport Wild Bill of America, also known as William Finlay, a popular author and speaker was arrested for carrying hate speech on his ipad. What? What prompted such a search to begin with?

WILD BILL FOR America-Bless-God-Again-Logo

He was invited to speak at an event at Calgary’s Olympic Plaza coordinated by Joey De Luca of WCAI. Makes more sense now…

A special event permit for the event was denied by Calgary’s Department of Recreation, according to an article by CBC News, “on the basis that your organization, and messages it espouses, are hateful.” But event spokesman, Jeremy Phillips, responded on FaceBook “We are going to march downtown and show the biased city officials that we will not be silenced. It’s all about standing up for our rights and freedoms.

News of William Finlay’s arrest was relayed to friends via Facebook message and we were tagged in a shared message within an hour of the arrest. It read “Was arrested at the airport for ‘smuggling hate speech’ on my iPad. Don’t know how this is going to turn out… really appreciate prayers and support of my friends.”

Finlay served as a Navy Corpsman with the Marines before becoming a career law enforcement officer, serving as both a Deputy U.S. Marshal and Deputy Sheriff. A public speaker, frequent guest on radio talk shows, YouTuber and blogger, Finlay says his “mission in life is to encourage and strengthen America’s faith in God and Country. It is not politicians, but individual Americans with the courage to speak out who will keep freedom alive in the USA. He was asked to leave Canada and is now back in the USA.

WCAI and Palestinian born Saudi raised Toronto resident and controversial agitator Sandra Solomon teamed up over the last couple months endorsing one another and created a disruptive ruckkus defying the city and the mayor over a number of events they planned this weekend all documented by ARC below.

Calgaryians in general then questioned their safety in the downtown area due to media attention and WCAI’s defiant facebook messages regarding the Mayor of Calgary. Police issued a press release on the matter.

Competing rally groups expected in the down town core included Antifa and Al Quds Day Ramadan Celebrations dedicated to wanting Jews and Israel removed from the Middle East. Jews are discriminated against by Islam and not even allowed to enter a number of Islamic Countries. WCAI was to protest Al Quds for this reason. Antifa was to protest WCAI as a hate group. Police did what they could to work with all involved.

Although they lost their headline speaker and plans for the event on the 24th due to no permit both have repeatedly stated they will not allow anything to stop them. Resourcefully now using the existing permit and reputation of a Street Pastor in Calgary on Sunday June 25th who seems to be behind them on this.

We and others have experienced negative affects of Solomon and Deluca’s targeting and boundary crossing, bullying and slander first hand when expressing disagreement with their actions and thus have clear insight on how this situation developed. Its our opinion they are not victims in this and brought much on themselves, possibly even on Wild Bill. They do insist on getting what they want and can steamroll, notwithstanding whom it may affect or how, often causing some mayhem in the wake. Tactics we denounce. Much of this hoopla could have been avoided with a more balanced, mature and peaceful approach.

BACKGROUND INFO: The situation was documented by ARC in numerous articles as it unfolded. See this link.
http://anti-racistcanada.blogspot.ca/2017/06?m=1

Recent media
Branded Hateful by Officials Anti Islam Group Plans To March Regardless of Permit
http://www.cbc.ca/…/anti-muslim-coalition-against-wcai-phil…

Calgary Police Brace For Controversial Rallies this Weekend
http://ow.ly/S6IE30cPh3l

Current Canadian Criminal code on Hate Speech Section 319
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/e…/acts/C-46/section-319.html

See The Speech That Wild Bill was going to give here:

Published on 25 Jun 2017

This is the speech I was to give in Canada. The cops read the script and ARRESTED ME FOR HATE SPEECH……..watch and decide if this is hate speech.  https://youtu.be/sZUmYQYDaw8

Advertisements

Muslims Across America In Full Celebration Mode Commemorating The “hard work” of Senator Rubio


Who needs to be concerned with Muslim terrorists running around when you have Marco Rubio up at the White House actively furthering their cause for a complete takeover of our country!

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

Muslims across America were in full celebration mode commemorating the “hard work” of Senator Rubio, where EmgageUSA put out the following public statement:

Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream.”

Anti-blasphemy laws have been a massive victory for Muslims across the world, as now followers of Islam can have people who speak out or criticize their religion thrown into prison. We continue to hear horrifying stories coming out of Europe and Canada where citizens are being rounded up and jailed for speaking out against Islam, as courts are now turning their backs on their very own citizens in order to pander to the very group of people who want to kill them. Now breaking news is confirming that a Senator Marco Rubio has just gotten a bill passed in the Senate that will make speaking out against Muslims a crime, in a shocking move of treason towards the American people that will leave you speechless.

We had enough damage done to our country under the tyrannical rule of Barack Hussein Obama, who was nothing more than a domestic terrorist who worked tirelessly to further the mission of radical Muslims around the world. Well now it appears as though Marco Rubio has just picked up the torch of treason, as he has just been exposed as the TRAITOR who spear-headed a bill that will make speaking out against Islam illegal, which was written by a Muslim terror organization with direct ties to Al Qaeda. Creeping Sharia reported:

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

Muslims across America were in full celebration mode commemorating the “hard work” of Senator Rubio, where EmgageUSA put out the following public statement:

Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream.”

So how bad has Rubio screwed over the American people? Here’s exactly what’s in the resolution which the Senate has just passed:

“…Federal law enforcement officials, working with State and local officials… to expeditiously investigate all credible reports of hate crimes and incidents and threats against minorities in the United States and to hold the perpetrators of those crimes, incidents, or threats accountable and bring the perpetrators to justice; encourages the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies to work to improve the reporting of hate crimes; and… encourages the development of an inter-agency task force led by the Attorney General to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities…”

What’s chilling is that THIS BILL HAS PASSED THE SENATE and has now gone on to the House, where almost the exact same verbiage was introduced as H.Res. 257. If passed, this law will create an “inter-agency task force” that will then go after people who speak out against Muslims, who are a “protected class.” H.Res. 257 urges:

“…the development of an inter-agency task force led by the Attorney General and bringing together the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities”. The House Resolution was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on April 6 and from there it was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations on April 21.

Why the hell is Marco Rubio selling us down the river in order to further the cause of radical Islam? The Muslim groups he worked with to get these bills passed are not “peaceful” Islamists either. EmgageUSA’s leader Khurrum Wahid is currently on a terror watch list for his extensive work with Al Qaeda, and as a lawyer, Wahid defended Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush!

FYI: Muslims are also pushing hard to be classified as a ‘protected minority/class’ when they should be classified as a Terrorist Group. This is absolutely unbelievable!

See House Legislation here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/257

See Senate Resolution  here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-resolution/118

THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO EXPOSED


By Michael Swift, “Gay Revolutionary.” Reprinted from The Congressional Record of the United States Congress. First printed in Gay Community News, February 15-21 1987

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

GAY WOLF IN SHEEPCLOTHING

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

gayroller

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.

rainbow franklin graham america wont like whats at the end of the rainbow

SOURCE: Redeeming The Rainbow

The Secret Illuminati Covenant Exposed


“An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception. Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

“This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.”

 We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us. We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive. Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.

“We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute. We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.

“We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening. We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the airThey will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

HOPI PROPHECY COBWEBS SPUN IN THE SKY

 The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison. The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems. From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

 The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear. We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far. We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons. 

ScreenHunter_1952 May. 01 14.39

“They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect. When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help. We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

 When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future. When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine. We will render them docile and weak before us by our power. They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

“We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they many never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may never be one with the oneness of it all. Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say. If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives.

 We will use fear as our weapon. We will establish their governments and establish opposites within. We will own both sides. We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan. They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil. 

“Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure always, for it is the way. We will make them kill each other when it suits us. We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion. We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how. We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves.

 We will foment animosity between them through our factions. When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by ridicule, or death, whichever suits us best. We will make them rip each other’s hearts apart and kill their own children. We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our friend. The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers.

 They will be busy killing each other. They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit.
conspiracy no matter how paranoid you are
“We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us. We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths. We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished. We will continue to make them live in fear and anger though images and sounds. We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this. The tools will be provided by their labor. We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

“We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know! They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal. Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal. We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total control over them. We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they will have. We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt. 

fed goat and debt slaves

“When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media. We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor. When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that. They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

“We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us. The recruits will be called “initiates” and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth.

bohemian_grove_

 They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us. For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they receive the light and travel the stars. They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will never know.

razor and mental slavery

 The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late. Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.

“When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion. When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin. Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial. 

razor blade lady opening her eyes

“But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then. THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW. If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action. They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.

“This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans. This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We,the ones who from heaven to earth came.”

 “This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist.

 It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.”

anon all we gotta do is stand up

Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_21.htm

EU could BREAK UP the US: Juncker in jaw-dropping threat to Trump over support for Brexit


EUROPEAN Union boss Jean-Claude Juncker this afternoon issued a jaw-dropping threat to the United States, saying he could campaign to break up the country in revenge for Donald Trump’s supportive comments about Brexit.

PUBLISHED: 12:14, Thu, Mar 30, 2017 | UPDATED: 16:52, Thu, Mar 30, 2017

Juncker threatens US and Trump for promoting Brexit

In an extraordinary speech the EU Commission president said he would push for Ohio and Texas to split from the rest of America if the Republican president does not change his tune and become more supportive of the EU.

The remarks are diplomatic dynamite at a time when relations between Washington and Brussels are already strained over Europe’s meager contributions to NATO and the US leader’s open preference for dealing with national governments.

They are by far the most outspoken intervention any senior EU figure has made about Mr Trump and are likely to dismay some European leaders who were hoping to seek a policy of rapprochement with their most important ally.

Speaking at the centre-right European People Party’s (EPP) annual conference in Malta this afternoon, the EU Commission boss did not hold back in his disdain for the White House chief’s eurosceptic views.

Jean-Claude JunckerEbS

EU boss Jean-Claude Juncker

Donald TrumpGETTY

Donald Trump has previously voiced support for Brexit

He said: “Brexit isn’t the end. A lot of people would like it that way, even people on another continent where the newly elected US President was happy that the Brexit was taking place and has asked other countries to do the same.

“If he goes on like that I am going to promote the independence of Ohio and Austin, Texas in the US.”

Mr Juncker’s comments did not appear to be made in jest and were delivered in a serious tone, although one journalist did report some “chuckles” in the audience and hinted the EU boss may have been joking. The remarks came in the middle of an angry speech in which the top eurocrat railed widely against critics of the EU Commission.

They will be seen as totally inexplicable at a time when EU-US relations appeared to be on the mend, with Vice-President Mike Pence having completed a largely successful trip to Brussels and the commander-in-chief himself significantly softening his tone towards the EU project.

Mr Juncker did not criticise Britain at all during his speech, and only made reference to Brexit in relation to Mr Trump and the opportunities it presents for Europe to reform itself.

 

If he goes on like that I am going to promote the independence of Ohio and Austin, Texas in the US

EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker

He told the audience in Malta: “Brexit isn’t the end of everything. We must consider it to be a new beginning, something that is stronger, something that is better.”

Speaking before him, EU Council president Donald Tusk was less reserved in his remarks about the UK vote as he tore into the populist politics which led to Brexit.

The Polish eurocrat said the argument over sovereignty – epitomised by the Vote Leave slogan ‘take back control’ – was “a view that is both foolish and dangerous” and that the EU guaranteed countries’ strength of the world stage.

He also accused populist politicians, such as the Netherlands’ Geert Wilders and France’s Marine Le Pen, of promoting “organised hatred” with their views on immigration.

However his conservative colleague Antonio Tajani, the EU Parliament president, received a rapturous ovation as he launched an impassioned defence of Europe’s “Christian values”.

 

In a series of thinly veiled comments about immigration, a major political issue in his homeland and Malta, the Italian official said Europe should do more to defend its historic identity.He said: “We shouldn’t be ashamed of saying we’re Christian. We’re Christian, it is our history.

“If we leave our identity we will have in Europe all identities but not European identities. For this we need to strengthen our identity.

“It is impossible to win without identity, without our values. Of course we are different, many languages, many ideas, but we are united on the values and this is the most important content.”

The Rand Corporation: The Think Tank That Controls America


By Alex Abella June 30, 2009
 
If you think the Internet came out of Silicon Valley, that NASA planned the first satellite to orbit Earth, or that IBM created the modern computer—think again. Each one of these breakthroughs was conceived at RAND, a shadowy think tank in Santa Monica, California.
NWO TERRIFIED MORE AWAKE BY THE HOUR
 
THE INTIMIDATION FACTOR
 
Rand rose out of the ashes of World War II. After witnessing the success of the Manhattan Project—the $2 billion initiative that created the first atomic bomb—a five-star Air Force general named Henry “Hap” Arnold (pictured) concluded that America needed a team of great minds to keep the country’s technology ahead of the rest of the world. In 1946, he gathered together a small group of scientists and $10 million in funding and started RAND (which stands for Research and Development). He even convinced a family friend, aircraft magnate Donald Douglas, to house the project at his factory in Santa Monica.
 
After a few short months, RAND got the attention of academics, politicians, and military strategists alike by issuing a prophetic study called “Preliminary Design of an Experimental World-Circling Spaceship.” At the time, rocket science was still in its infancy, so RAND’s call for an orbiting space station was revolutionary. Not only did the think tank specify the kind of fuel the spaceship would need and how quickly it could be built, but it also outlined how the station could predict the weather, transform long-distance communication, and, most importantly, intimidate our rivals abroad. If America could put a satellite into space, what else was she capable of?
 
Although President Truman passed on the space station, the military fell in love with RAND. Through Hap’s connections, the Air Force quickly became the think tank’s main contractor, and RAND began consulting on everything from propeller turbines to missile defense. Before long, the organization was so flush with contracts that it had to hire hundreds of additional researchers to keep up. In recruitment ads, RAND bragged about its intellectual genealogy, tracing a direct line from its president, Frank Collbohm, to Isaac Newton. Whether or not that claim was true, the institute secured a reputation as the place to dream up new ways to wage wars and keep enemies at bay.
 
By the 1960s, America’s rivals were paying attention. The Soviet newspaper Pravda nicknamed RAND “the academy of science and death and destruction.” American outfits preferred to call them the “wizards of Armageddon.”
 
WAR GAMES
 
The Soviets had good reason to worry about RAND. In 1957, the Air Force hired the think tank to create spy satellites. Within two years, it developed CORONA—a covert system that aimed to send camera-carrying satellites into orbit on the backs of missiles. While the idea was genius, the design was flawed. It took 13 failed attempts before the system finally got off the ground in 1959. Once it did, however, the results were spectacular. The CORONA satellite returned with 161 lbs. of film about the Soviet Union, more footage than spy planes had recovered in the previous four years combined.
 
For the following decade, CORONA became the backbone of American intelligence on the Soviet Union. Researchers watched troops march along the Russian border with China and spied on cities they’d never seen before. They could even count the fruit in Soviet orchards and analyze their crops.
 
By the early 1960s, RAND had established itself as a fixture of U.S. policy. Branching out from straight rocket science, the think tank had become the center of the nation’s nuclear strategy.
 
One high-profile RAND genius, John Williams, developed game theory to predict how the cagey Soviet Union might act during conflict.
The theory was a perfect fit for RAND, an organization that continually sought to impose objective reality on an irrational world.
 
Another genius, mathematician Albert Wohlstetter, came up with the fail-safe concept, which saved the world from nuclear conflagration several times. The idea called for a series of checkpoints for bombers armed with nuclear weapons. If a bomber pilot failed to receive confirmation at any checkpoint, he would abandon the mission and turn the plane around.
 
Once, in 1979, a mistake by a telephone operator led to a transmission that the United States was under nuclear attack from Moscow. Ten fighters from three separate bases took to the air armed with nuclear missiles. But in the end, because of Wohlstetter’s fail-safe system, none of them deployed their weapons.
 
Through the years, RAND’s sphere of influence became more visible. In the 1960s, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara hired scores of its young researchers—dubbed the “Whiz Kids”—to reorganize the Pentagon. But perhaps the thing that most solidified RAND’s reputation in the public’s imagination was the release of the Stanley Kubrick film Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb in 1964.
 
The movie’s title character, a deranged Nazi scientist, was modeled after RAND’s eccentric Herman Kahn. A military strategist, Kahn famously argued that America could easily survive an all-out conflict with the Soviet Union if people took refuge in shelters and rationed food. Although the radiation would cause hundreds of thousands of genetic defects, Kahn insisted the American people would endure.
 
Kahn’s apocalyptic scenarios didn’t end there. He also dreamed up the Doomsday Machine, a device that could destroy all life on Earth, which Kubrick used in Dr. Strangelove. In fact, Kubrick borrowed so many of Kahn’s sayings and ideas that the scientist began demanding royalties. Kahn was so persistent that Kubrick finally had to tell him, “That’s not how things are done, Herman.”
 
SPINNING A WORLD WIDE WEB
 
While RAND has played a major role in keeping America safe from military attacks and nuclear catastrophes, the think tank has also left its mark on the communications industry. RAND is directly responsible for packet switching, the technology that made the Internet possible. It all started in the 1960s, when the military asked RAND researchers to solve a hypothetical question: If the Soviet Union destroyed all of our communication systems with a nuclear bomb, how could we fight back?
 
A young engineer named Paul Baran provided an elegant solution by likening the nation’s telephone wires to the brain’s central nervous system. Baran proposed sending messages via phone lines and changing words into numbers to avoid noise and distortion. Baran also decided that any content relayed should be divided into “packets,” or discrete bundles of data. As a result, messages were separated during transmission, and would then automatically reconfigure themselves once they reached their destination. More importantly, if direct communications were destroyed, the packets could reroute themselves through phone lines anywhere in the world.
 
Baran tried to convince AT&T to install the system, but the phone giant refused to create something that could become its worst competitor.
 
Instead, the creation of a worldwide packet-switching system was left to the Pentagon, which devised ARPANET, the predecessor to the Internet.
 
HEALTHY CHOICES
 
During the 1960s, RAND also expanded its lines of investigation into education, welfare reform, and criminal justice. By the time Richard Nixon took office in 1969, the think tank was an established, independent source for social policy research. So, when the issue of medical insurance sparked a great national debate, Nixon tapped RAND for ideas. At the time, there was little data on the effectiveness of free health care versus coverage plans with co-pays and deductibles. In particular, Nixon wanted to know if free health care made people healthier. To find the answer, RAND’s Health Division spent 10 years acting as the insurance company for more than 5,000 people around the country.
 
In the end, RAND’s research found that people who paid for health care were just as healthy as people who got it for free. With free health care, people went in for more regular medical screenings, but their other habits—exercise, diet, smoking—were worse. The message was not lost on the insurance industry, nor on the federal government. In 1982, when the study was released, only 30 percent of medical plans had deductibles. Five years later, more than 90 percent did.
 
THINKING AHEAD
 
Health care was just the beginning of RAND’s expansion into the social sciences. Although 50 percent of RAND’s current $223 million budget still comes from federal funding, much of that goes toward non-defense work. The think tank currently employs close to 1,000 researchers, who spend their time analyzing everything from renewable energy and obesity to hurricanes and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
 
Globalization has also opened up the organization’s opportunities. In addition to its five centers that handle social and economic policy issues, as well as the five centers that focus on international affairs, RAND has an affiliate organization in Europe, and a prominent voice in Middle Eastern policy. Most notably, the RAND Qatar Policy Institute is working on reconfiguring the emirate’s entire educational system.
 
Of course, RAND hasn’t exactly abandoned its bread-and-butter services. The organization touts three federally funded research and development centers that concentrate on national security. After all, RAND did establish the discipline of studying terrorism in the 1970s, long before the United Nations even had a working definition for the word.
 
Today, the RAND Terrorism Chronology Database, which has catalogued all acts of terrorism from 1968 to the present, has become an invaluable tool for the military and the government. It makes sense that in these times, our new president will pay attention to the think tank, too. Barack Obama has taken a keen interest in its study on post-traumatic stress disorder in soldiers returning from Iraq. In other words, RAND already has his ear.
 
THE WHO’S WHO OF RAND
 
John Nash ““ RAND was the motherland of game theory during the 1950s and 1960s, and among its most prominent players was John Nash—the soulful subject of the book and movie A Beautiful Mind. Nash came up with what is now called the Nash equilibrium, which is used to determine the stability of competition.
 
Thomas Schelling ““ Schelling was an economist who came to RAND shortly after Nash’s frenzied departure. His game theory concocted a worldview of aggression and counter-aggression that was heavily influential during the Vietnam War.
 
Kenneth Arrow ““ One of the most influential RAND employees, Arrow posited that greed is good, and that what he termed “consumer sovereignty” should rule society. Some critics have blamed Arrow’s Theorem for providing the theoretical foundation for the free market frenzy of the past 30 years, including the current housing market meltdown.
 
Albert Wohlstetter ““ The most prominent member of RAND’s so-called Nuclear Boys Club. A brilliant theoretical mathematician and an unparalleled nuclear strategist, he worked at RAND on and off from 1951 to his death 46 years later. He originated the Second Strike nuclear doctrine (make sure you have enough backup nukes to wipe out any attackers) and the Fail Safe principle (drop the big one on your target only after confirmation in flight from headquarters).
 
Daniel Ellsberg ““ An endlessly loquacious mathematical genius, strategic thinker, and unlikely peacenik. Disgusted with official lies about America’s involvement in Southeast Asia, he leaked the Pentagon Papers, which set in motion the end of the Vietnam War.
i no longer see a constitutional republic
 
This article originally appeared in mental_floss magazine. Alex Abella is the author of Soldiers of Reason: The RAND Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire (Harcourt, 2008).

Globalists Continue To Push The Lie That Treaties Are Binding Upon The United States Citizens: Treaties Can Be Nullified By States Or Statutes & Obama Removed From Office!


Our Senate and President (not to mention that he is a usurper) lack lawful authority to enter into a treaty that conflicts with The Constitution so even signed and ratified it would not be a valid treaty.

Reblogged from Political Vel Craft dated July 2012

The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people. That lie is: “Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution“.

The Second follow-up lie is this one: “A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside”. HERE ARE THE CLEAR IRREFUTABLE FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that

1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution. 2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution. And last, 3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others. When you’ve read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone — anyone — claims that treaties supercede the Constitution. Help to dispell this myth. “This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” – Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.

This case involved the question: Does the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (treaty) supersede the U.S. Constitution? Keep reading. The Reid Court (U.S. Supreme Court) held in their Opinion that,

“… No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. Article VI, the Supremacy clause of the Constitution declares, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all the Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land…’

“There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification which even suggest such a result…

“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights – let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition – to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power UNDER an international agreement, without observing constitutional prohibitions. (See:Elliot’s Debates 1836 ed. – pgs 500-519).

“In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article VI. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and Senate combined.”

Did you understand what the Supreme Court said here? No Executive Order, Presidential Directive, Executive Agreement, no NAFTA, GATT/WTO agreement/treaty, passed by ANYONE, can supersede the Constitution. FACT. No question! At this point the Court paused to quote from another of their Opinions; Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258 at pg. 267 where the Court held at that time that,

“The treaty power as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or a change in the character of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent.”

Assessing the GATT/WTO parasitic organism in light of this part of the Opinion, we see that it cannot attach itself to its host (our Republic or States) in the fashion the traitors in our government wish, without our acquiescing to it. The Reid Court continues with its Opinion:

“This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which MUST comply with the Constitution, is on full parity with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict, renders the treaty null. It would be completely anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute that must conform to that instrument.”

The U.S. Supreme court could not have made it more clear : TREATIESDO NOT OVERRIDE THE CONSTITUTION, AND CANNOT, IN ANY FASHION, AMEND IT !!! CASE CLOSED. Now we must let our elected “representatives” in Washington and the State legislatures know that we no longer believe the BIG LIE… we know that we are not bound by unconstitutional Treaties, Executive Orders, Presidential Directives, and other such treasonous acts.

[Note: the above information was taken from Aid & Abet Police Newsletter, with limited revision. P.O. Box 8712, Phoenix, Arizona. Acknowledgment given to Claire Kelly, for her good assistance and in depth treaty research. The use of this information is not to be construed as endorsement of Aid & Abet Police Newsletter. Claire Kelly is a trusted and knowledgeable friend. – CDR]

__________________________________________

Here’s what Thomas Jefferson said on the right to renounce treaties:

“Compacts then, between a nation and a nation, are obligatory on them as by the same moral law which obliges individuals to observe their compacts. There are circumstances, however, which sometimes excuse the non-performance of contracts between man and man; so are there also between nation and nation. When performance, for instance, becomes impossible, non-performance is not immoral; so if performance becomes self-destructive to the party, the law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others”.

pg 317 – “The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson,” A. Koch & Wm. Peden, Random House 1944, renewed 1972. Jefferson also said in a letter to Wilson C. Nicholas on Sept. 7, 1803, Ibid. pg 573

“Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction [interpretation]. I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of the treaty making power as boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.” ______________________________________________________________Further evidence:

Excerpt from a letter from U.S. Senator, Arlen Specter, (R. Penn.) to constituent, November 3, 1994.

“Dear Mr. Neely:”Thank you for contacting my office regarding the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. … I have signed on as a cosponsor of Senator Bradley’s resolution [SR 70, which urges the president to seek the advice and consent of the Senate for ratification] because I believe that the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child is an appropriate step in the direction of promoting the well-being of children throughout the world. [he goes on to mention concerns that the treaty would subjugate familial and parental responsibility to an international entity, which he denies] “… Secondly, the Convention would not override the U.S. Constitution; rather, as in the case of any treaty, any provision that conflicts with our Constitution would be void in our country… “

[CDR Note: It is our belief that Arlen Specter would not have been as truthful regarding Constitutional Supremacy over treaties if he had a clue that this letter to a constituent would have found its way into the hands or eyes of the public.]

_________________________________________________

Logical deduction:      No law or treaty supersedes the Supreme Law of the Land.  ‘Supreme’… meaning ‘highest or greatest’.  What is higher than highest or greater than greatest, other than our Creator?  The Constitution acknowledges our God-given, unalienable rights, and secures those rights in that acknowledgement.         The Constitution gives the US Senate authority to ratify treaties with other nations. Americans have been propagandized into believing that those treaties become the supreme law of the land superseding the Constitution. Let’s examine this deception closely and dispel the myth once and for all. Article VI of the Constitution states:

Clause 2 – “This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution [of any state] or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.”Clause 3 – “The senators and representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executives and judicial officers, both of the United States and the several states, shall be bound by oath of affirmation to support this Constitution .”

Laws made in pursuance of this Constitution are laws which are made within the strict and limited confines of the Constitution itself. No federal, state, or international law, rule or bureaucratic regulation and no state constitution can supersede B or be repugnant to B this Constitution.

Treaties made under the authority of the United States… the United States (federal government) was authorized by and on behalf of the people and in pursuance of this Constitution to enter into certain treaties with other governments. The United States (federal government) obtains its authority solely from the Constitution. It would be ludicrous to think that it has the power to circumvent (via treaties) that which grants it its authority.

In Clause 3, it is made clear that every elected official, both federal and state, is bound by oath to support this Constitution. Who can rightly, and genuinely claim to be given the power to destroy that which they are elected and sworn to uphold?

The powers granted by the Constitution cannot sanely be construed to provide the authority to usurp, pre-empt or eradicate it.       The U.S. Supreme Court as cited above correctly ruled that the supremacy of the Constitution overrides treaties. It should be noted that if any Court, be it a State, Federal or the U.S. Supreme Court, should ever rule otherwise, the decision would be repugnant to the Constitution and the ruling would be null and void.

The answer to this question is self-evident.

The Constitution authorizes the United States to enter into treaties with other nations B the word Anation@ although not explicit, is certainly implied. The United Nations is an Organization – a Global Corporate Bureaucracy.The ‘experts’ in international law, commerce, banking, environment, etc.; and a cadre of alleged conservative / Christian-conservative leaders — lawyer, Dame of Malta, Phyllis Schlafly being a prime example — have been spewing forth propaganda to instill and further the myth of ‘treaty-supremacy’ for decades.

Their ‘expertise’ is an illusion created apparently with hopes to instill a sense of inferiority in the ‘common man’ (their term) so we will all defer to their superior intelligence. Let’s not go there. Here’s a perfect example of ‘expert’ propaganda on the supremacy question: On April 11, 1952, Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles (cfr), speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky said…

“Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law. Under our Constitution, treaties become the supreme law of the land…. Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, …can cut across the rights given the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”

Mr. Dulles is confused about the People’s rights. To repeat an earlier statement of fact: the Constitution doesn’t ‘give’ us rights. The Constitution acknowledges and secures our inherent, Creator-endowed rights. What Creator gives, no man can take away. The Dulles brothers worked (lied) long and hard to firmly establish the treaty-supremacy myth. And they realized it would have to be done by deceit — propaganda. Admittedly by propaganda.

“There is no indication that American public opinion, for example, would approve the establishment of a super state, or permit American membership in it. In other words, time – a long time – will be needed before world government is politically feasible… This time element might seemingly be shortened so far as American opinion is concerned by an active propaganda campaign in this country…”

Allen W. Dulles (cfr) from a UN booklet, Headline Series #59 (New York: The Foreign Policy Association., Sept.-Oct., 1946) pg 46.      The question of “nationhood” in reference to the United Nations seems to have been addressed by the errant Congress.  A quick fix apparently took place in the U.S. Senate on March 19, 1970. According to the Anaheim (Cal) Bulletin, 4-20-1970, the Senate ratified a resolution recognizing the United Nations Organization as a sovereign nation. That would be tantamount to recognizing General Motors as a sovereign nation. Are we beginning to get the picture? Case Closed Sweet Liberty

Second Important Article About The Treaty Myth.

Treaties do not override the Constitution.
By Don Fotheringham In anticipation that our president may sign one or more treaties that conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s limited grant of power, several voices of alarm are contending that a treaty can override, or in effect amend, our Constitution. Although that view has gained some currency, it is a myth that contradicts the intent of those who framed the Constitution. And it violates any reasonable interpretation of that document. Origin of the Myth The frightful idea that U.S. treaties with foreign nations supercede the Constitution has been regularly promoted since the Eisenhower era.
 divider gif
1 It was given a big boost in 1952 when Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), made the following statement:
divider gif
2 … congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution, whereas treaty laws can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President; they can take powers from the states and give them to the Federal Government, or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given the people by the Constitutional Bill of Rights.
 divider gif
3 It would be hard to find a more preposterous assertion. Sadly, however, many citizens have been led to believe that treaties do override the Constitution. Could anyone really think our founding fathers spent four months in convention, limiting the size, power and scope of government, and then provided for their work to be destroyed by one lousy treaty?
 divider gif
But one might object, what about Article VI? Article VI establishes the supremacy of U.S. laws and treaties made within the bounds of the Constitution. It is called the Supremacy Clause, because it places federal laws and treaties that are made pursuant to the Constitution above state constitutions, laws. and treaties. Some Important History This was needed because, contrary to their agreement under the Articles of Confederation, certain states had violated their trust and entered into treaties with foreign powers.
 divider gif
During the convention,
Madison said: “Experience had evinced a constant tendency in the States to encroach on federal authority; to violate national Treaties, to infringe the rights and interests of each other.”
divider gif
4 State-made pacts often conflicted with peace and trade treaties wanted by the Confederation Congress for the benefit of all thirteen states, making it hard for Congress to consummate better agreements with other nations. This also led to fierce contention between the states in their effort to monopolize the import of goods from Europe and the Indian tribes. But more serious dangers arose in matters of security, for should one state be at war with a foreign power while a sister state honors its peace agreement with the same enemy, the security of the entire Confederation would be threatened.
divider gif
5 In an effort to head off such dangers, the Confederation Congress frequently attempted to nullify
state-made treaties in the state courts (there were no federal courts). But as might be expected, the state judges ruled inevitably in favor of their own states, pursuant to the state laws and constitutions.
divider gif
The 1787 Convention corrected that problem by making certain only federal treaties would be recognized as valid. In this light, it is not hard to understand why paragraph two of Article VI is worded as follows: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. Upon ratification of the Constitution, the state treaties were nullified.
divider gif
Thereafter, only federal treaties were recognized as supreme, regardless of any remaining state provisions to the contrary. Moreover, under the new Constitution the founders established a Supreme Court, granting it original jurisdiction over treaty controversies, and thereby removing from state judges jurisdiction over treaty cases. In addition to quelling strife among the states, Article VI accomplished a major objective of the Convention, mainly that of placing the United States in a position to speak to the world with one voice.
 divider gif
United States treaties are created when proposed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The power of the President and the Senate, in their treaty-making capacity, was never intended to be a power greater than the Constitution. Citizens who met in the state ratifying conventions (1787 to 1790) to examine with great care the provisions of the proposed Constitution had a correct understanding of the Supremacy Clause.
divider gif
During the ratifying debates, James Madison answered questions regarding the new national charter and commented on the extent of the treaty-making power under Article VI: “I do not conceive that power is given to the President and Senate to dismember the empire, or to alienate any great, essential right. I do not think the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power must be consistent with the object of its delegation.”
 divider gif
6 In the same discussion
Madison said: “Here, the supremacy of a treaty is contrasted with the supremacy of the laws of the states. It cannot be otherwise supreme.” That is, a treaty cannot in any other manner or situation be supreme. Thomas Jefferson: “I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of treaty- making to be boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.”
divider gif
But we do have a Constitution. Its life and viability depend entirely on the small number of citizens who 1) understand the document, and 2) who equally understand the forces at work to destroy it. At this point enough time has passed, and enough false teachings have been promulgated, to cause modern Americans to fall for the treaty power ploy. It is not surprising that John Foster Dulles, a ranking member of the CFR, should in 1952 circulate the treaty-power heresy that yet prevails.
divider gif
It is time for serious reflection on the words of Edmond Burke, “The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.” Those who seek to preserve the sovereignty of the United States must work energetically to expose the Dulles delusion — the ridiculous idea that treaties have intrinsic powers greater than the Constitution.
 divider gif
1 In decades immediately prior to the Dulles speech, Supreme Court decisions had already begun to enunciate the idea (see, for example, Missouri v. Holland in 1920 and United States v. Pink in 1942).
 divider gif
2 Dulles actually made this statement during a speech in Louisville on April 2, 1952, shortly before Eisenhower appointed him Secretary of State.
 divider gif
3 Quoted by Frank E. Holman, Story of the Bricker Amendment, (New York Committee for Constitutional Government, Inc., 1954), pp. 14, 15.
divider gif
4 The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Farrand, Vol. I, p. 164.
 divider gif
5 Benjamin Franklin’s Plan of Union, America, Vol. 3, p. 47.
 divider gif
6 Debates on the Federal Constitution, Jonathan Elliot, ed., second edition, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Company, 1907, Vol. III, p. 514. Robert Welch University
divider gif
Founding Fathers

divider gif

Related articles:

Border Patrol Agents Are Being Ordered To Stand Down By Obama Administration


Published on Feb 4, 2016

Video Transcript:

Trey Gowdy and the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Thursday about the Obama administration’s inability to secure the southern border.

The Obama administration has revived the maligned illegal immigrant “catch-and-release” policy of the Bush years, ordering Border Patrol agents not to bother arresting and deporting many new illegal immigrants, the head of the agents’ labor union revealed Thursday.
 
Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, told Congress that Homeland Security was embarrassed by the number of illegal immigrants not showing up for their deportation hearings, but instead of cracking down on the immigrants, the department ordered agents not to arrest them in the first place — meaning they no longer need to show up for court.
immigration senate hasnt read
 
Mr. Judd said the releases are part of President Obama’s “priorities” program, which orders agents to worry chiefly about criminals, national security risks and illegal immigrants who came into the U.S. after Jan. 1, 2014. Mr. Judd said illegal immigrants without serious criminal convictions have learned that by claiming they came before 2014 — without even needing to show proof — they can be released immediately rather than being arrested.
 
“Immigration laws today appear to be mere suggestions,” Mr. Judd testified to the House Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee. “That fact is well known in other countries.”
 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which oversees the Border Patrol, did not deny Mr. Judd’s claim but said agents have been instructed to prioritize whom they arrest.
 
“The Border Patrol’s resources are most effectively focused on the border — prioritizing the apprehension and removal of individuals attempting to unlawfully enter the United States,” said Michael Friel, a CBP spokesman. “Our removal numbers reflect that. Border Patrol agents are issuing notices to appear, consistent with law, regulation and the department’s enforcement priorities.”
deport illegals no moslem refugees
 
The White House declined to comment. Spokesman Josh Earnest said he hadn’t seen the testimony.
 
Mr. Obama has pushed for Congress to grant citizenship rights to most illegal immigrants, but after Capitol Hill failed to deliver he took action on his own to carve most illegal immigrants out of danger of deportation.
 
He and Mr. Johnson said deportation and border agents should worry chiefly about dangerous immigrants and new arrivals. Those with deeper ties to the U.S. who have not amassed criminal records should be passed over, Mr. Obama said.
 
Mr. Judd said there are holes in that policy. He said agents have been ordered not to ask for proof when an immigrant says he or she has been in the U.S. since 2013, and migrants have quickly learned to assert that claim without having to worry about having it challenged.
thomas jefferson on immigration
 
He said on the northern border, where he is stationed, agents arrested an illegal immigrant who had recently been charged with felony domestic violence. He had to be released because he hadn’t gone to trial yet, so he hadn’t been convicted.
 
“Under the law, he should have been set up for removal proceedings, but under the policy he was let go,” Mr. Judd testified. “And he was let go even though he first proved that he cared so little about our laws that he entered the United States illegally, and once here, he proved further disdain by getting arrested for a serious violent act against another.”
 
Mr. Judd was testifying at a hearing called to examine the surge of illegal immigrants — unaccompanied children and families traveling together — who have overwhelmed agencies. After peaking in early summer 2014, the numbers dropped. But 2016 is on pace for a record year.
 
Mr. Judd and Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies, said criminal cartels are using the families and children to flood the border to distract agents and create chances to smuggle drugs.
 
The cause of the surge is heatedly debated.
 
Immigrant rights advocates said the children and mothers are fleeing horrific violence and should be considered asylum-seekers, not illegal immigrants. The advocates point to spiking homicide rates.
 
El Salvador leads the Western Hemisphere with 103 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants. Honduras is third worst with a rate of 57 homicides, and Guatemala is fifth worst with 30 per 100,000 people.
 
San Pedro Sula in Honduras recorded 885 homicides out of a population of just less than 800,000 people last year, according to a Mexican nongovernmental organization that tracks the statistics. San Salvador, the capital of El Salvador, recorded 1,918 homicides among its 1.8 million people — a rate of 109 per 100,000.
 
The U.S. city with the highest homicide rate per capita, St. Louis, recorded a rate of 59 per 100,000 inhabitants.
 
Wendy Young, president of Kids in Need of Defense, which handles cases of children applying for protection in the U.S., detailed horrific stories of children being enslaved by gangs, tracked down if they try to leave and being killed as retribution for crossing the gangs.
 
She recounted the story of one 14-year-old girl who was abducted by a gang and gang-raped for four days before she escaped. Her family fled to another location inside the country, but the gang tracked her down, and her family sent her north to the U.S.
 
“These children are doing the only thing they can — they are running for their lives,” Ms. Young said.
 
Mr. Judd said children wanting to claim asylum can go to a border entry point and present themselves to CBP officers. Instead, the cartels deliver them to some of the remote parts of the border before sending them to find Border Patrol agents, keeping the agents occupied while the cartels smuggle their goods, the agent said.
 
Border Patrol agents used to interview the children and ask them why they came, and the overwhelming majority said they believed enforcement was lax and they would be allowed to stay.
 
Ms. Young said the children were likely frightened by agents and officers in uniforms, so the information they gave was not to be trusted.
 
Regardless, Mr. Judd said, agents have now been banned from asking those questions.
 
⦁ Dave Boyer contributed to this report.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Published on Feb 4, 2016

Video Transcript:

Trey Gowdy and the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Thursday about the Obama administration’s inability to secure the southern border.

TREY GOWDY: Secretary [Jeh] Johnson testified before the appropriations committee: “The message we are sending to people crossing the border is you will be sent home.” Either that message has not been communicated or it has not been received because the border cross, the unlawful border crossings continue.

According to U.S. Border Patrol, the Obama administration is ordering the release of illegal immigrants, effectively allowing them to stay.

BRANDON JUDD: The willful failure to show up for court appearances by persons that were arrested and released by the Border Patrol has become an extreme embarrassment for the Department of Homeland Security. It has been so embarrassing that DHS and the U.S. Attorney’s office has come up with a new policy. Simply put, the new policy makes mandatory the release, without an NTA, of any person arrested by the Border Patrol for being in the country illegally, as long as they do not have a previous felony arrest conviction and as long as they claim to have been continuously in the United States since January of 2014. The operative word in this policy is “claim.” The policy does not require the person to prove they have been here which is the same burden placed on them during deportation proceedings. Instead, it simply requires them to claim to have been here since January of 2014. Not only do we release these individuals that by law are subject to removal proceedings, we do it without any means of tracking their whereabouts. In essence, we pull these persons out of the shadows and into the light just to release them right back to those same shadows from whence they came. Immigration laws today appear to be mere suggestions. There are little or no consequences for breaking the laws and that fact is well known in other countries. If government agencies like DHS or CBP are allowed to bypass Congress by legislating through policy, we might as well abolish our immigration laws altogether. In the absence of consequences and enforceable laws innocent people are hurt, criminals are rewarded, chaos abounds, and cartels reap huge financial benefits.

Are you concerned that the Border Patrol is being prevented from doing its job? Share and comment below.

FACEBOOK NAZIS AT IT AGAIN.


FACEBOOK NAZIS AT IT AGAIN.. BLOCKING ME FROM MY OWN PROFILE HOW IN THIS FACEBOOK HELL AM I SUPPOSED TO RECOGNIZE THE PROFILE THAT THESE IMAGES GO TO?

Texas orders its volunteer groups to stop resettling ISLAMIC Syrians


Fri. Nov. 20 2:55 pm

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has instructed volunteer organizations that settle international refugees to immediately stop helping Syrians in the wake of the deadly Paris attacks — even though it may not have the authority to do so.

The Health and Human Services Commission wrote Thursday to volunteer and community groups reminding them of a “statutory duty to cooperate and consult” with the state. The letters were released to the media on Friday.

“If you have any active plans to resettle Syrian refugees in Texas, please discontinue those plans immediately,” according to the letter, which was signed by Chris Turner, the agency’s executive commissioner.

It also asked that groups notify state authorities immediately if they learn that federal authorities are proposing resettlement in Texas using their services, adding “we reserve the right to refuse to cooperate with any resettlement on any grounds.”

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and more than half of his gubernatorial counterparts have said their states will not take in Syrians fleeing their war-torn homeland, citing security concerns. Authorities in Washington, D.C., say resettlement programs are federally funded and involve volunteer and private organizations — meaning states can’t dictate policy.

Abbott has countered that by pointing to specific language in federal law.

“The narrative out there is absolutely false when they say governors have no authority to do anything about this, because we do,” Abbott said Wednesday on the Fox News Channel. “Under Section 8 of the U.S. Code, Section 1522, it specifically authorizes the states to control these refugee programs.”

Legal experts, however, have told The Associated Press that that statute spells outs only states’ rights to consult in the process. The governor’s office said Friday it preferred not to comment beyond Abbott’s previous statement.

While questions of authority linger, the effects of the order already are being felt in Texas.

Relatives of Syrians who live in the Dallas area had been scheduled to resettle their families there Dec. 4. But Anne Marie Weiss-Armush, who heads the nonprofit refugee-assisting organization DFW International Community Alliance, said the letter from Texas health authorities means federal officials likely will send them to another state.

“It’s not going to stop the Syrians,” she said of Texas’ orders. “These refugees have been in the vetting process two years. They’ve been investigated multiple times and they are still coming. But they will not be coming where they are not wanted.”

Weiss-Armush said the suburb of Richardson had been an ideal place since relatives were willing to take them in. She said her organization will put beds that had been donated for the family to use in storage.

“It reminds me of the Japanese-Americans that were resettled in the desert,” Weiss-Armush said, referring to U.S. internment camps from the 1940s. “Innocent families that were caught up in World War II.”

Also Friday, a family in Connecticut accepted a married couple and their 5-year-old son who fled Syria in 2011 and had been set to resettle in Indiana. The refugees were reassigned after Gov. Mike Pence ordered state agencies to halt resettlement activities.

Source: http://m.lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2015-11-20/texas-orders-its-volunteer-groups-stop-resettling-syrians#gsc.tab=0

TEXAS BOOTS OBAMA DONT MESS WITH TEXAS

Our Government: Aiding And Abetting Illegal Aliens
By: Chris Freind, The Bulletin
04/02/2008

The following is the mission statement of the Philadelphia Prison System: “To provide a secure correctional environment that adequately detains persons accused or convicted of illegal acts; to provide programs, services and supervision in a safe, lawful, clean and humane environment, and to prepare incarcerated persons for re-entry into society.”

Unfathomably, the last part of that policy makes no distinction between American citizens and illegal aliens. Both are released back into our society, courtesy of the incompetent United States government.

It’s good to be an illegal immigrant in America!

Try following this “logic”: an illegal alien gets convicted of a crime, serves his sentence, and is then handed over to the Immigration service. More often than not, instead of being deported, the ILLEGAL alien (the key word being “illegal”) is actually released back on the American streets. Why? Because many countries don’t want their own convicts repatriated, so they deny or delay the process of deportation. Since the Supreme Court generally limits the detention of these aliens to 180 days, they go free.

Several small points come to mind:

1. Why are any countries dictating to us what we can and can’t do with their citizens who are in this country illegally?

2. Since undocumented criminal aliens are rearrested an average of eight times (and we’re not talking about stealing a candy bar; most offenses are robbery, assault, murder, drugs and sexual crimes), has it dawned on our political leaders that their inaction places every American in grave danger?

3. Perhaps most ironic, by instituting such a policy, our government is, in fact, committing a crime every time it releases an illegal alien. Aiding and abetting illegals is unquestionably against the law, and by definition, setting them free inside America qualifies as both.

A 2006 Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Report estimated that most of the 302,000 deportable criminals admitted into state and local facilities in 2007 would be released rather than removed at the end of their sentence. Given the there are estimated to be between 300,000 and 450,000 illegal aliens in federal, state and local jails already, and that the taxpayer cost to house these people is staggering, those with minor offenses should have the charges dropped and immediately deported to their country of origin. But how do we do this if the other countries are not cooperative? By refusing to roll over to the whims of other nations. It’s time to play hardball.

Playing Hardball: Deportation Legislation

Sen. Arlen Specter has taken the lead on this issue by introducing a bill which would deny foreign aid and suspend visa issuances to countries which delay or refuse to repatriate. This common sense legislation should be passed swiftly by both houses and signed into law for the immediate benefits it will produce.

In addition to making the streets safer by deporting illegals (who broke the law to get here in the first place), the bill would make a significant dent in our prison overcrowding problem (the Philadelphia prison system houses 8,700 inmates, even though it was only designed for 6,200). Too many criminals are having their sentences reduced or suspended altogether because there is simply not enough capacity within our correctional facilities, placing our law-abiding citizens in jeopardy yet again. It also sends the message that crime does pay since the odds of serving a full sentence are remote.

There will also be a huge savings to taxpayers. Since the daily cost to house prisoners is very expensive (the Philadelphia Prison System cost is $91/day), it doesn’t take a math genius to figure out how much will be saved by jettisoning the illegal alien deadweight. The numbers speak for themselves.

It is time America starts taking care of itself first, placing its citizens ahead of illegal invaders. Our economic future, our physical security, and continued respect for the rule of law depend on it. For theses reasons, prompt passage of the Specter legislation is a necessity.

http://www.alipac.us/f12/our-government-aiding-abetting-illegal-aliens-104323/

According To Federal Law, Many Of Our Politicians Should Be In Prison For Aiding And Abetting Illegal Immigration July 4, 2014

Posted on October 1, 2014

We truly live in a lawless nation.  According to federal law, it is illegal to encourage or induce illegal immigrants to enter the United States, and it is also illegal to either be engaged in or aiding and abetting the “domestic transportation” or “harboring” of illegal immigrants.  In other words, many of our top politicians and a whole host of federal officials should be going to prison.  The following comes directly from the Justice Department

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.

Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient.

Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.


Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
“Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or

* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or

* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens

It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an alien for a fee, knowing the alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an alien knowing that the alien is unauthorized to work. Employers may give preference in recruitment and hiring to a U.S. citizen over an alien with work authorization only where the U.S. citizen is equally or better qualified. It is unlawful to hire an individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days’ advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. Day laborers or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verfication of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the alien labor. The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer’s work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual’s accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.

IT IS ILLEGAL FOR NONPROFIT OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, REGARDLESS OF CLAIMS THAT THEIR CONVICTIONS REQUIRE THEM TO ASSIST ALIENS. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.

Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any alien who is in the United States in violation of law. HARBORING MEANS ANY CONDUCT THAT TENDS TO SUBSTANTIALLY FACILITATE AN ALIEN TO REMAIN IN THE U.S. ILLEGALLY. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien’s illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien’s entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that “encouraging” includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.

The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years’ imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years’ imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years’ imprisonment.

Enforcement

A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.

State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer’s consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.

RICO — Citizen Recourse

Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, AND CAN INCLUDE NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONS.

Tax Crimes

Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In additon to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/AidAbetUnlawfulSec8USC1324.html

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/according-to-federal-law-many-of-our-politicians-should-be-in-prison-for-aiding-and-abetting-illegal-immigration-july-4-2014/

Boycott: List of Companies Pushing for Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/boycott-list-of-companies-pushing-for-amnesty-for-illegal-aliens/

Chris Freind can be reached at cf@thebulletin.us
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?a … 4977304592

Churches Criminally ‘Aid and Abet’ Illegal Aliens
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/Churches.html
October 12, 2005

Dated 2005

U.S. Flag Carrying out a well publicized invasion plan, Mexico has declared as heroes the millions of poverty stricken ‘migrants’ they have encouraged to invade America.  Mexico has brazenly deployed a massive ‘human tsunami’ of its poorest citizens as a ‘migrant army’ to ‘reconquista’ the land that America purchased by treaty agreement after winning the Mexican-American War.  The illegal alien invasion of America now totals 20 million, 90% of whom are Hispanics.(1-7)  ‘Without firing a shot’ Mexico intends to win their ‘de facto‘ war by leveraging those ‘migrant’ masses to gain enough political power to shove their balkanizing, racist Hispanic agenda down the throats of America!

How Mexico Wages Its ‘de facto’ War:  1.  By creating Mexican laws allowing dual citizenship;(8)  2.  By legislating the right to vote in Mexican elections by absentee ballot from America, approved in 2005;(8)  3.  By promoting nationalism and Hispanic racism.  The Mexican government, their Hispanic-American shills, sponsor programs and practices that “upholds the political or economic domination of one race over another or others;”(8)(9)  4.  By working surreptitiously in concert with Hispanic organizations and politicians here in America, Mexico pursues its ‘reconquista’ of American land, by actively and blatantly promoting the purist form of racism there is!(8)(10)

As the Hispanic anti-white, anti-American organization of MEChA, the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán), or ‘Mechistas’ as they call themselves, has arrogantly proclaimed:  For those in the race everything. For those outside the race nothing.(11)(12)  A racist, bigoted and arrogant statement which displays ignorance of the fact that the Hispanic raza (race), is NOT a race.

5.  By ‘Meddling’ in America’s Affairs, in Defiance Of Our Laws:  The Mexican government, continuously and blatantly colludes with Hispanic politicians, individuals, groups and organizations here in America, who act as their shills.  Sadly and outrageously, nearly all of those Hispanic organizations receive funding, some in the millions, from the Ford Foundation, and many, many corporate ‘others’, who want to keep that cheap labor flowing.(8)

Mexico’s shills and operatives include the racist Hispanic organizations like The National Council of La Raza, MALDEF, LULAC and MEChA, in addition to the ACLU, which is headed by an Hispanic, and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and numerous American politicians and individuals of Hispanic descent.(13-15)  They constantly work ‘behind the scenes’ using our courts, Hispanic advisory counsels and other political access to eliminate any and all actions that might thwart or stop the illegal alien invasion of America that continues at a rate of 10,000 a day.(8)(16-18)

Issuing Matricula Consular Cards(21)

6.  By Using Roving Mexican Consulates To Undermine Our Laws.  Their consulates travel around America issuing matricula consular or Mexican ID cards to illegal aliens.(19)(20)  Shamefully, the roving consulates are frequently provided taxpayer funded public buildings in which to do their ‘dirty’ work!  Disgracefully, they are often provided government officials who instruct illegal aliens on how to take advantage of our country’s ‘public benefits,’ and federal welfare and tax systems.(21)  Everyone is aware that only the ‘migrant army’ of illegal aliens needs those Mexican issued IDs because those that are here legally have official U.S. documents validating their presence.

The Mexican illegal aliens take those ID cards and use them to access our banks, obtain drivers licenses, mortgages, credit cards and other rights and privileges, that are usually reserved for American citizens.  “The matricula’s growing acceptance by U.S. businesses is both a measure of how entrenched illegal immigrants are becoming in American society and of how eagerly the marketplace is courting them.”(22)  Permission to accept the Mexican ID was granted by the Treasury Dept. over the objections of the FBI and the Justice Dept.(23)  Ergo . . . money wins out over law and order!

How Massive is the Mexican Consulate System in America?

Mexico has just opened their 46th consulate in St. Paul, Minnesota.  For the Minneapolis-St. Paul and surrounding suburbs “it [the consulate] was already a latecomer to a bustling Mexican-American community that included, according to consular official, 22 churches offering services in Spanish, 9 Spanish language newspapers, 3 tortilla makers and 9 Hispanic – mostly Mexican soccer leagues.”(24)

The Mexican consulate official chides his country’s efforts by saying:  ‘We are responding to the needs of the Mexican community’ [of mostly illegal aliens], said Nathan Wolf, the new consul.  ‘We are just following the movement of people.’(24)  Don’t you wonder how they are able to keep up since Mexicans are overrunning hundreds and hundreds of our cities and towns all across America?

They call Minneapolis the new Axochiapan, said Ramiro Hernandez, a successful businessman who arrived in the United States illegally 20 years ago from Axochiapan, a small town in the central Mexican state of Morelos.  Mr. Hernandez proudly proclaims that:  ‘Ninety percent of the population there [in Axochiapan] has people over here [in America].  Kids come here as soon as they come of age.’”(24)

Isn’t that heartening for Americans to hear that the ‘right of passage’ for their Mexican children is to illegally enter the United States, illegally reside in the United States, and then illegally work in the United States, while our government does nothing to stop the massive invasion by a foreign countryJust think . . .  Axochiapan is but one tiny little Mexican town in the whole country of Mexico.  Multiply that by all the other poverty stricken towns in Mexico and you have some idea of how massive the invasion is.

“Municipal officials in Axochiapan estimate that at least a third of the population has moved [to America].  The mayor wants to HONOR the migrants [illegal aliens] with a 10-foot statue of a man carrying a bag and leaving his wife and two children behind.”(24)  You can bet that she won’t be there long.  As soon as the ‘migrant’ gets set up, she and her children will ‘migrate’ too, along with many others from their typical Mexican extended families.

As for the enforcement of our borders, “Once I was caught five times,’ said Arnulfo Pliego, 44, a migrant [illegal alien] from Axochiapan who first came to the United States in 1989, and has shuttled between Morelos and Minnesota for the last nine years.  ‘I said to myself, ‘I must pass, I must pass,’ and I passed.’”(24)

Like Arnulfo, the illegal aliens try repeatedly because they know that once past the border they are ‘home free’ and can, like Arnulfo arrogantly give their name, age and location to the newspaper with absolutely NO FEAR of reprisal!  That does say a lot about ours laws and their enforcement.  The words that come to mind are “it’s a JOKE!”

Oh, by the way . . . Mexico plans to open its 47th consulate in Little Rock, Arkansas by the end of 2005.

While President Bush condemns Mexico for their ‘racist’ post office stamps, he is totally silent about the massive ‘human tsunami’ of illegal aliens crushing our country.  In fact he supports them:  By outrageously and erroneously calling our patriotic Minutemen ‘vigilantes;’ by identifying illegal aliens euphemistically as ‘undocumented’ (as if they were just missing some kind of paperwork); and by praising illegals for their ‘family values’ while they break MANY of our immigration laws; while he constantly proclaims that “they are here to do the work Americans won’t do,” an outright lie and euphemistic camouflage for the invasion.

Bush’s solution to the invasion is to rename the ‘migrant army’ . . . ‘guest workers’ and give them a path to citizenship as a reward for illegally entering, residing and working in America.

A Warning For the Un-Anointed:  Be prepared to find that much of the Hispanic and Latino rhetoric and propaganda that is discussed below will be deliberately obfuscating, duplicitous, hypocritical and dishonest!  These groups wage blatant ‘in your face’ campaigns of disinformation by calling themselves ‘immigrant advocacy groups’ or ‘immigrant-rights groups’ or ‘human-rights groups!’  They routinely call legislation that eliminates ‘public benefits’ for illegal aliens, as “anti-immigrant.”  You will notice, they NEVER say anti-illegal immigrant.  The word “illegal” is NOT part of their vocabulary!  Without fail, they deliberately obfuscate by using the term “immigrants” when we all know that the real issue is ILLEGAL immigrants.

How Mexico Expects to Win the War:

1.  First They Brazenly Announced their Mexican Manifesto in 1982 in a prominent Mexico City newspaper.  It is very eerily ‘Osama like’ and diabolically clear to all today, that Mexico has planned and then executed a ‘stealth war’ by invasion and colonization of the United States of America.  Incredibly, the manifesto is a carbon copy of the illegal alien invasion and balkanization that American citizens have been forced to endure for more than two decades.  Now, in 2005 there is overwhelming evidence that we are being invaded by a foreign country.

Illegals Climbing Border Wall 2.  Mexico Arrogantly Declares its ‘Migrant Army’ War PlanA peaceful mass of people, hardworking, carries out slowly and patiently an unstoppable [illegal alien] invasion, the most important in [Mexico’s] human history.  You cannot give me a similar example of such a large migratory wave by an ant-like, stubborn, unarmed, [illegal aliens] and carried on in the face of the most powerful and best-armed nation on earth [America].”(25)

But neither barbed-wire fences, nor aggressive border guards, nor campaigns, nor [un-enforced American Immigration] laws nor police raids [not unless you commit ANOTHER crime] against the undocumented [illegal aliens], have stopped this movement of the masses that is unprecedented in any part of the world [true].(25)

In 1950 they were called ‘Pachucos’ (half-breeds) [then came the ‘wetbacks’ then the ‘braceros’]; today they are called ‘Chicanos.’  They have marked social and family characteristics, agility for adapting to the environment and for conquering a great region [America], once primitive and virgin, that belonged to our fatherland [Mexico] and we lost it [via the surrender Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo after America won the Mexican-American War(26)(27)(28)].  But it seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without the firing of a single shot, nor requiring the least diplomatic action [because both presidents, Bush and Fox, have colluded to do so], by means of a steady, spontaneous, and uninterrupted occupation.(25)

The occupation of America by Mexico’s poorest of the poor, clearly elaborated and detailed in the Mexican Manifesto announced in 1982, demonstrates a de facto war that has been carefully planned, artfully directed and facilitated by both governments, then executed without a single change or deviation from the original plan.

Just as with Osama’s fatwahs, our government has ignored the pronouncements of the Mexican Manifesto and has egregiously and outrageously facilitated Mexico’s ‘stealth’ war by not enforcing our immigration laws.

3.  By Engaging Hispanic and Latino Organizations as Their Shills:

NOT ONE National Hispanic organization in America is against the illegal alien invasion.  NOT ONE! Not LULAC, nor the National Council of La Raza (The Race), nor MALDEF, nor MEChA, etc.  How do they ‘show their colors?’  For example:  Paul Martinez of LULAC, the League of United Latin American Citizens, says . . . “they vehemently oppose the minuteman project.”(29)  Well . . . of course they do!  They oppose any and all efforts to stop the massive illegal alien invasion by Hispanics and Latinos.  They applaud, encourage and facilitate the lawlessness.  It’s all part of their racist agenda to increase their numbers in order to obtain political power and domination.(30)  Wake up America!

The National Council of La Raza [The Race, which is NOT a race] the International Socialist Organization [Communists], the Southern California Human Rights Coalition [Includes illegal aliens] and the San Gabriel Valley Neighbors for Peace and Justice [that’s Peace and Justice for illegal aliens, but not for you!] say that there should be no borders and therefore no illegal immigrants!”(31)  The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is an anti-American, pro-illegal alien lobby that receives funding from a very long list of American corporations, which can be found here:  (32)

LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens) a Mexican-American organization that lobbies:

  1. For Racial preferences.
  2. For The legalization of illegal Hispanic immigrants.
  3. Against the military on the border.
  4. Against English-Only in America.(34)

They received $1 MILLION from the Ford Foundation in 2004 when William Clay Ford wrote:  “As the largest and oldest Hispanic organization in the United States, LULAC continues to provide its more than 115,000 members with the necessary tools to be leaders in their communities.  Great people making a difference in the community help all of us learn, appreciate and respect the contribution of everyone in our diverse citizenry . . .  Ford has been a member of the LULAC Corporate Alliance for over a decade, and we are proud to support its many programs and initiatives.”(35)(36)

Is funding the LULAC organization Ford’s way of keeping the cheap labor in-coming to run their assembly lines?  Or, more darkly, is it retribution for those workers who revolted over the inhumanly sped-up original Ford assembly line?  Just a couple of questions to try and understand why the Ford Foundation would continue to fund an organization that is so blatantly anti-American in EVERY agenda they pursue.  Is there any other explanation for such promotion, continuous support and funding by the Ford Foundation?  It seems that profit the only motivation that ‘fits.’

LULAC’s Chapter President, Paul Martinez, La Cruces, New Mexico, funded by the corporate dollars of the Ford foundation and many, many others, has denounced the Minutemen patrols by saying:  “They are hiding under the American flag claiming to be good patriots, but they are actually promoting racial hatred.”(33)

Is that how you see the Minutemen, those true American Patriots ‘doing the job our government won’t do,’ by guarding the borders?  If they do drape themselves in the American flag, is that a negative?  Then again, be sure and take notice whenever the Minutemen are challenged by Hispanic and Latino protesters, you’ll notice that those protesters wrap themselves . . . in the Mexican flag.

United Day Laborers' March

LULAC Lobbies Against English-only in America:

In their response to the 1996 US House of Representatives English Language Empowerment Act, passed to mandate the use of the English language as the unifying, singular language of America, LULAC said:  “English-only is incredibly divisive [not unifying?] because it sends the message that the culture [language is a culture?] of language minorities [illegal aliens] is inferior and illegal.  With a dramatic increase in hate crimes and right wing terrorist attacks in the United States, the last thing we need is a frivolous bill to fuel the fires of racism.”(34)

So, LULAC thinks it’s ‘racist’ to want to have a single unifying language, our own native language, as the ‘official language.’  Think about it . . . here in America, the Hispanics are telling us we should not have such a law, that it is ‘frivolous.’  How outrageous can you get?  Americans are not entitled to mandate our national language as ‘official’ but they are free to shove their Spanish language down our throats, everywhere and everyplace?  Aren’t they trying to make our own English language ‘inferior’ and ‘illegal’ to us?!  Remember, ‘press one for English!’

Why do we need to have such a bill in the first place?  Wake up America!  Everything our legislature tries to do to keep America from turning into another Spanish speaking Hispanic dominated country . . . is racist.  LULAC’s efforts to quash such legislation is part of their Hispanic agenda to push aside and replace our English language with theirs.  Get the picture?

Illegal Alien Invaders

MALDEF (The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund):

MALDEF was created and financed by the Ford Foundation, receiving more than $25 MILLION.  In 1998 alone, MALDEF received $9 MILLION from the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation combined.(37)  It will probably make you sick, but you can read more about how corporate and foundation wealth finances mass immigration, see below at this number:  (38)

MALDEF frequently uses their funding to attack legislation like Arizona’s Prop. 200.  They often legally challenge and attack many other anti-illegal alien issues and legislation.  They operate closely with Mexico, who stays behind the scenes ‘pulling the strings.’  They also push for legislative action that will advance their racist Hispanic agendas.

MALDEF’s Agenda Is Much the Same as the ACLU’s: (37)

  1. Open Borders.
  2. Free College Tuition for Illegal Aliens.
  3. Lowered Educational Standards to Accommodate Hispanic Students.
  4. Opposes English-Only Laws.
  5. Voting Rights for Criminals.
  6. Lawsuits to Try and Stop Arizona’s Prop. 200.

Of course they want the borders to remain ‘open’ so that millions more Hispanics and Latinos can enter.  As time goes on, and the ‘migrant army’ grows ever larger, their collective voices will become louder and louder and even more stridently racist, oppressive and offensive.  Are you prepared to fight back?

Free college tuition?  Can Americans get a free college education?  The Hispanics are drunk with the power they have been granted by our courts who have ‘legislated from the bench’ to give them free K-12 education.  Why else would they think they should now be entitled to a free college education?  Don’t you see how arrogant and demanding they are now?

What will they be like when they have insinuated themselves into our legislatures, police departments, mayoralties, schools, jails, hospitals, courts, churches, local townships and advisory boards, etc. . .?  Just let your mind wrap around those thoughts!

Yes, lower those academic standards to accommodate Hispanic students who can’t keep up, while at the same time penalizing our American children by dragging them down to their level.  It’s just another example of the Hispanics shoving their agenda down our collective throats to the detriment of our children.  Let’s just dumb down the our children’s education by denying them access to quality education and devastate their future lives and prosperity so that those illegal aliens, who shouldn’t be here, can compete.  Insanity reigns!

Why give voting rights to criminals?  Because Hispanics have a disproportionate number of criminals in our jails already.  Thirty-three percent of the federal prison population are illegal aliens.

MEChA:  “For the race everything. For those outside the Race, nothing!”  And . . . of course the ‘race’ they speak of is Hispanic/Latino (which is NOT a race).(12)  Why do we Americans put up with being called ‘racist’ and ‘anti-immigrant’ by the truly racist pro-illegal alien Hispanic and Latino organizations, when we demand our immigration laws be enforced against illegal immigrants?(13)(14)(15)  Why do we let them get away with such hypocritical accusations of racism?

Author Jim Trageser got is right when he said:  “There is no possible logical, intellectual or even moral pretense for supporting illegal immigration . . .  What other ammunition do they have in their arsenal [except the charge of racism]?  There aren’t any logical, sensible arguments in favor of simply opening our borders.  Not even the most vehement supporters of illegal immigration will make that argument straight out.”

“Instead, they criticize Border Patrol sweeps, assail efforts to deny benefits to those who break the law to get here, ridicule those who would watch the border voluntarily.  And when they are called on the emptiness of their argument, when they are asked why immigration law shouldn’t be enforced in a logical even-handed manner, they resort to a burned-ground campaign of character assassination against anyone who openly advocates in favor of [the] fuller enforcement of our immigration laws.”

“The purpose of calling someone a racist isn’t to change his mind or heart, not to convince others of the veracity of your position.  The point is to distractTo intimidate!  . . .  To silence!”(39)

Unfortunately all of the above Hispanic and Latino organizations have become powerful because they have been organizing and infiltrating our society and infrastructures for decades and are heavily funded by the Ford Foundation and many others which has allowed them to “successfully and aggressively promote hatred of the history, identity, culture, language, and laws of the United States.”(40)

These racist organizations are working hard to change America into an Hispanic nation.  Their goal is to inalterably change and dominate our culture, society and language.  Think about how that will impact you, your children, and your children’s children!  Wake up America!

4.  By Using American Political Shills To Work for Them:

In August, 2005, “[a]t the offices of the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (Department of State of the Republic of Mexico), four USA elected officials [paid with American taxpayer dollars and supposedly representing the interests of American citizens] said that they will be asking the Bush Administration to declare “border vigilantism” against Mexicans and other immigrants along the US/Mexico border prosecutable and punishable under the federal hate crime laws.  The officials said that the violent activities by groups like the Minutemen vigilantes [a bald-faced lie, with no proof], the KKK, white supremacy militias and other similar groups are totally unacceptable.”(41)

You did, of course, notice how they lumped all the groups together in one sentence so that one would have to ‘parse’ their attack and separate one group from the other, in order to challenge them to substantiate the charges.  It was a sneak assassination of America’s Patriotic Minutemen, through implication by association, to other UNCONNECTED groups.  Pay attention to their tactics.  They use them all the time.  As for just who those Mexican shills are, read on.

County Supervisor of San Bernardino, California Josie Gonzales, the Mayor of Lynwood, California Ramon Rodriguez, [born in the town of Valparaiso, Zacatecas, Mexico] Borough President of The Bronx Adolfo Carrion, [Puerto Rican] and Delaware State Representative Joseph E. Miro [Born in Cuba] held the press conference at the offices of the SRE in Mexico City and directed most of their statements at President George W. Bush . . . [and said] “Bush should openly declare that he is against the Minuteman Project, and more aggressively criminalize their activities, which are motivated by anti-immigrant [sic, anti-illegal-immigrant] sentiments that are racist and paranoiac.”(41)  You did of course notice the word ILLEGAL is missing between anti and immigrant.  A common tactic employed by ALL the pro-illegal alien racists.

Sadly, American Churches Are Helping Mexico Win the War:

What is truly outrageous about the Mexican ‘stealth war‘ is that many churches and their ‘leaders’ in America have become the proverbial ‘fifth column’ for Mexico’s reconquista war, by ‘aiding and abetting’ the Hispanic tidal wave.  By functioning as a ‘fifth column’ they are “a group of people who act traitorously and subversively, out of a secret [or not so secret] sympathy, for the enemy of their country.”(42)  Our American churches are hard at work ‘aiding and abetting’ the overwhelming Hispanic illegal alien invasion that has trampled our laws and sovereignty, balkanized our neighborhoods, and insidiously and deviously corrupts and degrades our unifying English language, American culture, and society.

What is ‘Aiding and Abetting?’  To actively, knowingly, or intentionally assist another person [such as an illegal alien] in the commission or attempted commission of a crime.(43)  For example ‘aiding a abetting’ illegal aliens to enter, reside and work in America, involves three separate felonies.  Or, for the clergy to ask or engage their ‘flock’ or other sympathizers to join together in church sanctioned projects or events to criminally ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens, is inviting them to participate in a conspiracy, which is an additional felony.

Those churches and religious followers who ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens here in America are legion.  This article reveals only one thin slice of the ‘aid and abet’ pie.  This research reveals that churches of many denominations have deliberately violated multiple federal immigration laws in pursuit of their ambition to ‘help’ illegal aliens as part of their religious affiliations and misguided beliefs.  They have engaged in this lawbreaking . . . repeatedly, endlessly and unchecked by our government!

Why do religious institutions, like the Catholic Church, and others, defy our immigration laws?  Why do they flaunt our laws, by enabling millions upon millions of illegal aliens to enter, reside and work in America?  Do they do so in order to ‘feel good’ about what they see as their ‘Christian duty’?  Why do pious people of the Christian faith believe it is okay for them to disobey our laws, which were created to protect and defend our country and its populous?  Do they feel that they are above the law?  By their example, does that mean that it is okay the rest of us to disobey other laws, as we chose?  As you will find below, they DO believe that they are ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW!

Churches and religious groups who choose to defy our immigration are criminals!  It does not matter what ‘higher law’ they think they are obeying.  They are the proverbial ‘Fifth Column’ who operates out of sympathy for the ‘invading army’ of illegal aliens, by traitorously and subversively facilitating the Mexican ‘migrant army’ invasion of our country.  An Hispanic/Latino invasion that WILL, by their sheer numbers, irrevocably alter our American community.  They will divide our nation into two languages, two cultures, and two societies.  The Catholic Church and Charities, their membership along with other churches and religious zealots who think only of their ‘mission’ without regard for the rest of us . . . are traitorous criminals who are betraying their country and its citizens!

Churches and religious zealots apparently believe that they should not be bound by the immigration laws of our country.  They have taken it upon themselves to defy our laws by illegally ‘aiding and abetting’ aliens to come, enter, take up residence and work here in America.  That makes them criminals!  They also conceal, harbor and shield them from detection in houses, transport them and engage in conspiracies with others to commit those same illegal acts.  In their ‘blind ambition’ the Catholic Church, Charities and many others are committing felonies in violation of our immigration laws, because of their misguided religious fervor.  They are facilitating and perpetuating the unrelenting and exorable illegal alien invasion of our country!  Their complicity and duplicity is a national tragedy and an egregious sacrilegious disgrace!

Many church organizations such as the California Council of Churches, which represents 1.5 million members of mainstream Protestant and Orthodox churches, and the Pomona-based Progressive Christians Uniting have pilloried Governor Schwarzenegger for standing up for those American Patriots called the ‘Minutemen.’  The churches and their minions sniveled:  “We are appalled that Governor Schwarzenegger, who as our state’s chief magistrate is pledged to maintain the rule of law, has chosen instead to praise a group of vigilantes who operate outside the law, saying they’ve done a terrific job in patrolling the border with Mexico.”(44)

They go on to say:  “No responsible or moral public official would encourage citizens to take the law into their own hands, particularly on an issue that is already so laden with division and hatred.”(44)

And, still more invective:  “‘Playing on people’s fears and divisions and dropping bombshells like those [praising the Minutemen] of last week represent demagoguery, not leadership’ said the letter, signed by the Rev. John Walsh, a University of Redlands chaplain, and 149 other religious leaders.”(45)

Unfortunately . . . those churches and ‘Christian’ leaders(???) have based their entire diatriabe on a LIE!  How moral is that?  It is deemed a lie, because the Patriot Minutemen have NEVER taken the law into their own hands nor has such an accusation been proven to be true . . . EVER!

What is so outrageous about all these religious institutions that are discussed here, is that they are fostering and promoting anarchy which is the:  “Absence of government; [creating] the state of society where there is no law or supreme power [except God’s law and who enforces that?]; [it is] a state of lawlessness; [and of] political confusion.”(46)  If the churches succeed is their mission . . . they will destroy the United States of America, a nation once touted as “a nation of laws!”

The Rev. Peter Laarman of Progressive Christians Uniting said:  “We want to keep the level of violence, potential disruption and confrontation as low as possible.  The religious leaders who signed this [letter to Schwartzenegger] are trying to be peacemakers.”(44)

The pro-illegal alien churches all want ‘as little confrontation as possible’ so that they can continue to undermine our laws and sovereignty by encouraging and supporting illegal aliens to enter, reside and work here.  The question they need to be asked and answer, is . . . how much ‘peace’ will there be when America has descended into chaos and anarchy?  A condition that which will surely occur if the illegal alien invasion continues unchallenged and unabated.

Girl with Flag How To Stop the Traitorous ‘Aiding and Abetting’ of Illegal Aliens:

By Enforcing These Immigration Laws:

1.  It is illegal to “encourage or induce an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.”  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv).(47)

2.  It unlawful to aid or abet the commission of such acts.  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(II).(47)

3.  It is also unlawful to conceal or attempt to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, illegal aliens, including any building or any means of transportation.  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii).(47)

4.  It is illegal to “engage in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts.”  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I).(47)

To ‘Aid and Abet’ is to actively, knowingly, or intentionally assist another person in the commission or attempted commission of a crime.

To engage in any of the above is a felony:  A crime is considered a felony when the specified crime carries a penalty of more than one year in prison.(48)  For the crimes listed above the maximum penalties range from five to twenty years for EACH (illegal alien) violation.  Where sentences over five years indicate additional aggravating circumstances.


How The Catholic Church ‘Aids and Abets’ Illegal Aliens:

Most unfortunately, you will find that the Catholic Church and Charities and many, many of their misguided parishioners have collectively become the largest and most blatant illegal alien enablers in this country.  They are citizens of the United States who, in direct violation of our federal immigration laws, enable illegal aliens to enter, reside and work here in America!  Everything they do in the name of their ‘Christian beliefs’ is done in defiance of our immigration laws and without any concern for the harm they are causing the rest of us hard-working, honest, law-abiding, mostly Christian, Americans.  What they do, by definition, makes them traitors, guilty of treason because they betray their country, and countrymen in order to promote an agenda of aiding and abetting illegal aliens, in direct contravention of our laws.(8)

It is particularly egregious for the Catholic Church, Charities and other church denominations to ignore our immigration laws when it results in such damaging negative effects on the ‘quality of life’ for the rest of us Americans.  What a shameful example they provide for us and our children.  Any sanctimonious justifications they might give for their illegal behavior, is unacceptable!  What they do fosters anarchy and chaos, which impacts ALL Americans.  Apparently Catholics and other religious organizations who join them, believe they are ‘special people,’ when in fact they are criminals who are shamefully and erroneously justifying their behavior by sacrilegiously cloaking themselves in the mantle of Christianity and biblical mantras.(8)

1.  In May, 2005, the “U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops announced . . . that they will ‘add the voice of the Catholic Church’ to the call for a guest-worker program, and a path to citizenship for illegal aliens in the United States.”(49)  To support that goal the Catholic Church’s ‘Migration and Refugee Services‘ has launched a controversial campaign called ‘Justice for Immigrants.’  However it seems that their campaign apparently does not include obeying the immigration laws of our country!  The campaign hopes to use God’s law to replace U.S. Immigration law.”(50)

“According to the [Catholic] church, the bible says to care for the poor, the weak and unfortunate.  The church says that includes illegal immigrants.”  “The church also wants lawmakers to develop a plan to help bring their families to the U.S. as well.”(50)

Do the math!  That means if there are 18-20 million illegal aliens here now, that figure of potential influx could quadruple to 80 million if their families are brought in under the ‘family reunification’s plan that the Catholic Church espouses.  In a country where the number of current legal citizens is 296 million . . . those numbers are a demographically overwhelming!  Of course that does not include the ‘anchor babies’ they will also produce!  To understand the depravity of this Catholic dogma, read on . . .

2.  Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, the archbishop of Washington, DC, according to the Washington Times, in May of 2005, said that religious teachings justify aiding illegal aliens . . .  “We go right to the New Testament and say, him or her who is without sin cast the first stone.  How many of us have not violated some laws, whatever they might have been — either they’re traffic laws or immigration laws or tax laws, something like that.”(49)

Perhaps some have occasionally cheated and done one, or two of the above.  You did notice that you would have to ‘parse’ his statement to agree or disagree, because many have ignored speed limits and ‘forgot’ to claim something on their taxes, but violate immigration laws?  Only illegal aliens and those who help them have done that.  That lawbreaking is in a ‘class by itself’ and does NOT begin to compare to traffic or tax lawbreaking.  Aiding and abetting illegal aliens is far more serious by comparison, not to mention that it is the kind of illegality that can have a massive impact on the rest of society, in ways that breaking traffic or tax laws do not.

Does the biblical quotation cited by the archbishop of the Catholic Church justify the promotion of anarchy in America?  Does it also sanction inciting others to deliberately ignore United States immigration laws?  How outrageous can you get?  What he suggests is ILLEGAL to do and comes with a very ‘healthy’ felony penalty that includes serious jail time.

McCarrick is encouraging his ‘flock’ to break our immigration laws by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens, all with the blessings of the Catholic Church along with reassurances that the Holy Bible gives you that permission!  Is it so important to the Catholic Church that an archbishop would twist and pervert sayings from the Holy Bible to support ignoring and defying our immigration laws, placing America on the path to anarchy?

Is their program ‘Justice for [Illegal] Immigrants‘ and its unspoken counter-mandate of ‘Injustice for Honest, Hard-Working, Law-Abiding American Citizens really that important to the church?  Or, are their programs, exhortations and blatant pandering, simply a quest for ‘instant Catholics’ that will provide a major increase in their church membership?  You can decide those answers for yourself!  Read on . . .

3.  Father Michael Seifert of San Felipe de Jesus said:  Any family in economic need has a right to immigrate, that’s our posture, if a family is hungry and the family needs work, then society should provide a way for people to do that.”(51)  Translated that means . . . it doesn’t matter that is violates the sovereignty and immigration laws of America, we the priests of the Catholic Church consider ourselves ABOVE THE LAW!

4.  St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church in Raleigh, NC Held a statewide rally for hundreds of Latinos and their advocates, which included the Catholic Church, and Ecxaida Gamez of the Episcopal Ministry of Washington in Beaufort County and Javier Garcia of the Faith Action International House.(52)

After “a mariachi band played near the church alter,” the speakers called for “laws to legalize illegal aliens,” improvement of housing conditions, and “more interpreters for Spanish-speakers [read . . . jobs for English speaking Hispanics] at public health facilities” and a “tighter partnership with community colleges.” (52)

These requests seem reasonable, until you understand that they are for ILLEGAL ALIENS who have increased the Latino/Hispanic population in North Carolina by 400% in the 1990’s, and increased an additional 35%, on top of that 400%, to an estimated 517,000 from 2000-2004.(52)  And, you can count on that explosion to continue due to the illegal alien’s high birthrates and because 10,000 illegal aliens are crossing the Mexican border and invading America, EVERY DAY!(18)

5.  Father Jose Eugenio Hoyos Director of the Roman Catholic Church’s Spanish Apostolate, in the Arlington Diocese of Virginia said:  “Where all the Hispanics are coming from, I don’t know.  Sometimes I think maybe the Holy spirit is sending them too fast.”  He said this jokingly at a press briefing.  What is not a joke, is the fact that nearly ALL of these newly arrived Hispanics are illegal aliens who have broken our immigration laws to invade America.  Of course Father Hoyos must know that he is ‘aiding and abetting’ their presence here in America, which is a crime.(53)

Father Hoyos, born in Columbia, one of 12 children, said “the church frequently hosts Salvadoran bishops and conducts mission work in El Salvador.”  Of the 160,000 Latino Catholics in just this ONE Arlington, VA Catholic diocese 64,000 are Salvadoran.(53)  Don’t you wonder how that many got here legally?  Well, as you might guess . . . they didn’t!

6.  Arlington Bishop Paul Loverde said “the roots of the Roman Catholic Church in American are steeped in immigration, and it’s important now to continue welcoming immigrants [illegal aliens] of all backgrounds to the church.”(53)  However, the bishop knows full well that 90% of the 20 million illegal aliens who have invaded America are Hispanics and Latinos and therefore mostly Catholics, so his exhortations are very disingenuous.

7.  Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church was used by the Mexican consulate [a FOREIGN government] to issue matricula consular ID cards to illegal aliens.  “The process . . . included a ‘carousel’ of tables, connecting locals [illegal aliens] with vital information about taxes, employment, community college classes, police and driving in the United States.”  Vincente Sixtos said, speaking through a translator from the state department of Employment, ‘It’s very important, because the identification helps with police and getting credit started with a bank account.’”  Claudia Guzman speaking through an interpreter from Rogue Community College [Oh my, the college is so aptly named], “you can’t get a license without it . . . and it will definitely be accepted at Wells Fargo to open an account.”  What can you do?  Fight back . . . take your money out of the Wells Fargo Bank wherever you live.(54)

Matricula Consular Card “Getting a bank account is key to starting a credit history, as well as sending money to relatives in Mexico [twenty billion dollars will be taken out of the American economy and sent to Mexico in 2005] . . .  We are already a bicultural community [of illegal aliens].  They’re our neighbors and we need to be aware of that and accept it.”(54)

Well, do you ‘accept it?’  If so just sit back and do nothing.  If you don’t ‘accept it’, join up with the Minutemen or any of the hundreds of anti-illegal alien groups, like the United Patriots of America, who are fighting to save America from the US government sanctioned insanity that is permitting this overwhelming illegal alien invasion of our country.

8.  “Bishop Gerald Barnes, leader of the Diocese of San Bernadino, is urging federal legislators to extend disaster aid to illegal immigrants uprooted by Hurricane Katrina, and not to deport undocumented immigrants [illegal aliens] who fled the storm-ravaged Gulf Coast.”(55)  They are criminals who have violated several immigration laws, so why aren’t we deporting them?  Can you commit several felonies and continue to remain free from jail?

Bishop Barnes goes on to say:  ‘Now is the time to serve our common humanity and not discriminate against victims of the disaster because they are not U.S. citizens,’ Barnes, the chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration, said in a Tuesday letter to federal lawmakers.(55)

‘Like U.S. citizens, noncitizens have suffered from the hurricane and its aftermath, having lost their loved ones, their homes, jobs, and possessions.  The relief they need is commensurate with the relief needed by U.S. citizens affected by the disaster, but they are in danger of being overlooked,’ Barnes wrote [to federal legislators].(55)

However, you will notice how Bishop Barnes, has cleverly dichotomized the victims into two groups when in reality there are THREE groups:  (1) U.S. citizens; (2) U.S. non-citizens who are here legally; and (3) U.S. non-citizens who are here illegally.  That is how Catholic Bishops like him and others, deviously and maliciously ‘twist and pervert’ the facts in order to deceive and corrupt your thinking and understanding about the illegal immigration issue.

Why should American taxpayers dollars be spent to support people who broke our laws to enter, broke our laws to reside here and broke our laws to work here, while at the same time, due to finite funds, shortchange American citizens and legal aliens?  Isn’t there something wrong with that picture?

It’s already an insult that illegal aliens get free education, free hospital emergency care and then some, have their babies on ‘our dime,’ who then become automatic citizens, or ‘anchor babies’ who qualify for all sorts of ‘public benefits’ including Medicaid . . . and now Bishop Barnes wants even more.  When is enough, ENOUGH? Most importantly it should be noted that the Catholic hierarchy wants what is against the law to be given to illegal aliens.

The law states that:  Undocumented [illegal aliens] and nonimmigrant [those aliens here on work, school or visitor visas] workers are eligible for noncash, in-kind emergency disaster relief such as food and shelter and emergency medical care, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.  But federal rules do not allow illegal immigrants to receive other federal aid unless a member of their family, such as a child [anchor baby], is a citizen, FEMA officials said.(55)  Does that mean if they have an ‘anchor baby’ they get cash aid for the entire family?  We will never know.  It was a question the reporter should have asked but didn’t.

9.  Cardinal Roger Mahony, has urged Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign legislation that would provide undocumented [Illegal aliens] with California Driver’s licenses . For what reason has a cardinal of the Catholic Church come out in favor of such a law?  Is the car necessary to get to Church?  Where are all those ACLU types who insist on ‘separation of Church and State’ when you need them?  Most of all . . . why should we ever think of rewarding illegal aliens, who have violated AT LEAST three of our immigration laws, by giving them driving privileges?(56)  Latest bulletin . . . Schwarzenegger, an American Patriot, refused to sign the bill.

10.  Sister Mary Jo Toll of the Catholic Diocese of Toledo recently “told the Allen Country Clergy Fellowship . . . ‘that immigration law gives no authority to local law enforcement officers to investigate immigration issues unless they are already investigating a specific crime’.”(57)  First of all, illegal aliens already ARE criminals, who have committed a series of crimes by illegally entering, residing and working here in America.  By doing so, they have committed three separate criminal felonies under federal immigration law.

In fact, Sister Toll’s statement is false on its face.  There are absolutely no restrictions that would keep local police from enforcing all laws, which of course includes federal laws.  Isn’t it a fact that local police enforce other federal laws that involve kidnapping, racketeering, and murderers that cross state lines, and so on?  Why would immigration laws be any different?  As for committing another crime before Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will get involved, that is a POLICY and manpower decision made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and is not based upon law.

Sister Toll goes on to say:  “Local police or deputies are not authorized to look for undocumented immigrants unless they are wanted for a crime. . . .  The law has so many nuances, if they’re not trained in it, they’re not competent to do that.”(57)  Here again she is wrong about local law enforcement’s sworn duties and obligation.  They are required to enforce ALL laws, including federal laws.  They cannot ‘pick and choose’ which laws they will enforce.(58)

Toll also warned that “companies would open themselves up to lawsuits by breaking federal anti-discrimination laws if they investigate one group of workers more than others.”(57)  Her threat is an attempt to apply ‘pc’ (political castration) in order to the stop law enforcement from looking for the very Hispanics that represent 90% of the twenty million illegal aliens who are already here.  You know . . . let’s not be looking at that ‘elephant’ in the room!  Yes, let’s keep doing full body searches on those 85 year old White grannies in a wheel chair, when we all know that the terrorists are all . . . males of certain age ranges, ethnic and religious backgrounds.  Insanity revisited!

Perhaps it would be helpful to know that Sister Toll is the director of the ‘Immigrant and Migrant Ministry.’  Apparently she has a ‘vested interest’ in keeping a steady stream of illegal aliens coming into our country for her ‘ministry.’  It is also patently clear that she has an agenda and a mission that involves protecting that unending supply of illegal aliens.  In order to accomplish her ‘agenda,’ she has set herself up as an ‘authority’ on law enforcement and immigration law which she clearly has twisted and perverted to ‘make her case.’  Shame on you, Sister Toll.

11.  “Catholic Archbishop Joseph A. Fiorenza and [Houston, TX] City Councilmen Gordon Quan and Adrian Garcia, said a congressional program allowing workers [Bush’s guestworker program] to come here legally would eliminate the need for groups like the Minutemen to monitor illegal immigrants. . . .  The leaders at the conference [who were] organized by The Metropolitan Organization, said they do not welcome the [Minutemen] patrols.”

Councilman Adrian Garcia, “a former Houston police officer, said HPD [Houston Police Department] would monitor the Minutemen ‘as they would the KKK, as they would the Black Panthers.’”(59)  Are you outraged yet?  Imagine . . . American patriots who want our country’s immigration laws enforced, are branded by well-funded Latino and Hispanic groups and Hispanic ex-police officers, as promoting ‘racial hatred!’  Is that how you see it?

12.  Rev. Oscar Cantu, of Holy Name Catholic Church said the following at the conference, “let’s stand up for family values” by calling for reuniting families divided by immigration.  Translation . . . he means, bring all the women and children they left behind in Mexico, etc., here to America so that they can join their illegal alien husbands.  They also arrogantly declared that “they [the conference members] represent the views of most Houstonians in calling for humane treatment of illegal immigrants.”  However, polls show that Houstonians are ‘ambivalent’ about illegal immigration.(59)

It is suggested, that their ‘ambivalence’ exists because many are afraid to speak out against illegal immigration.  Like the rest of our citizenry they have been ‘brainwashed’ by the cult of diversity and have been ‘neutered’ by pc (political castration).  Also, since many are Hispanic, they can and do face retaliation from friends, neighbors and family members who are ‘card carrying member’s of the ‘fifth column’ who support the rabid reconquistas.  They also face being racially condemned for their ‘ambivalence’ with the label of ‘coconut’ . . . brown on the outside but white on the inside.

13.  Fr. Kevin Collins, of the Immaculate Conception Church, in the predominantly Mexican east end of Houston has said:  “Its [day labors centers have] been well received — a win-win situation . . .  As a member of the executive committee of the Metropolitan Organization of the Industrial Areas Foundation, Collins helped to get private and public funding [that’s your tax dollars] to build the East End Worker Center in March [of 2005].”(60)

Fr. Collins explained that:  “First of all, if people are getting paid for their work, that’s good for the community.  It’s helped in providing a place where you don’t have a bunch of men standing on the corner, where you have little old ladies or a child threatened a bit by walking by these guys.”(60)

Reflecting on Fr. Collins comments, you must have noticed two things . . . one is that he and his group are breaking the law to ‘aid and abet’ finding work for illegal aliens.  Two . . . didn’t you wonder why ‘little old ladies’ and a ‘child’ could be ‘threatened a bit’ just ‘walking by these guys?’  Everyone knows that it is not just the old and the young passers-by that feel ‘threatened’ . . . it is everybody that passes by, school age children and women of all ages feel threatened.  It is a well-documented phenomenon.  What kind of behavior are these men exhibiting?  Guess!  These are men who shouldn’t even be here in our country.  Why should our citizenry be exposed to such behavior in the first place?

What it all boils down to is that our ‘quality of life’ is being harmed by these illegal aliens.  It needs to be stopped by enforcing our immigration laws.  American citizens should not fear walking down the streets of their hometowns by people who should be deported or sent to jail.  Lastly, Fr. Collins is participating in a criminal act by aiding and abetting illegal aliens.  Isn’t that a wonderful example, for all to see and know, that a member of the Catholic Church is a criminal who condones and supports the flaunting of our immigrations laws?

Other Churches Who ‘Aid and Abet’ Illegal Aliens:

1.  The Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), has apparently joined hands with the Catholic Church in agreement with Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick’s mantra that religious teachings justify aiding illegal aliens . . .  “We go right to the New Testament and say, him or her who is without sin cast the first stone.  How many of us have not violated some laws, whatever they might have been — either they’re traffic laws or immigration laws or tax laws, something like that.”(61)

By a vote of 900-50 taken at their annual conference in Orlando, August 2005, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, has called upon its 10,000 congregations of 5 million members to support the goal of the Catholic Church’s ‘Migration and Refugee Services‘ controversial campaign called ‘Justice for Immigrants.’(61)(62)  A campaign that apparently does not include obeying the immigration laws of our country!  And, according to KFOX TV, The campaign hopes to use God’s law to replace U.S. Immigration law.”(50)

“In practical terms, the Protestant denomination [ELCA] asked each of its 65 bishops to establish a task force to advocate for and serve immigrants in their regions.”(62)  What this means is that they have essentially asked 65 bishops to participate in a ‘conspiracy’ to ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens, which is of course a criminal violation of our immigration laws.  To understand how they plan to accomplish their work read on . . .

According to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), who is “Living in God’s Amazing Grace” (their motto) the:  Newcomers without legal documents [illegal aliens] also are among the most vulnerable.  Congregations are called to welcome all people, regardless of their legal status.  Persons who once were or now are without documents are members of our congregations, and we want them to feel and know that in the Church they are part of a safe and caring community.  We encourage bishops and synods to show their support for congregations composed of or working with immigrants who may or may not have documents.(63)

So we find another church who wants to use “God’s law to replace U.S. immigration law” and “welcome all people, regardless of their legal status”‘.  It seems that the entrenched, monolithic, established religions are all advocating anarchy.  They advocate providing treasonous help to Mexico as a ‘5th column’ by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens to come, reside and work illegally in America making them feel that “they are part of a safe and caring community” by defying our immigration laws.  How sick and pathetic is that?

2.  The Baptist Church Weighs In:

According to Marv Knox, editor of the Baptist Standard an “Hispanic Baptist pastor prompted the Baptist General Convention of Texas [BGCT] to form an immigration task force.  Out of that group’s work, both the BGCT and the Hispanic Baptist Convencion of Texas have passed resolutions urging ministry to, and justice for immigrants.”(64)  Well, there it is again . . . “Justice for [illegal] Immigrants” or ‘Injustice for Honest, Law-Abiding American Citizens!’

So now we know that the Hispanic pastors originated the quest for ‘justice for immigrants’ and the naive, gullible and ‘bleeding heart’ Baptists took up the ‘mantle’ of ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens for them.  Could it be that those ‘Hispanic pastors’ had an agenda?  And, just what could that be?  Do you suppose it had something to do with the clearly stated Mexican Manifesto and their ‘migrant army’?

As for the Baptists:  Both conventions stress, “The Bible teaches and the ministry of Jesus instructs that believers are to minister to the ‘alien’ [Gee, even the bible used the term ‘alien’] and the ‘stranger’ in the land.”  They also note churches do not violate any laws when they meet the basic needs of undocumented [illegal] immigrants.  They both call for ministry to immigrants “through prayer and action.”(64)

Apparently Mr. Knox is unaware that praying for illegal aliens is okay, but it’s the ‘action’ part that will get Baptists in legal trouble.  He also does not understand that ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens, in any way, IS illegal and punishable by up to five years in jail.  Not very good advice from Marv Knox, editor of the Baptist Standard.(64)

3.  The (New Life Presbyterian Church) or Cumunidade Presbiteriana Nova Vida as it is called in Framingham, where Pastor Manoel Oliveira claims:  “We’re here to fight a particular idea that is being impregnated [He means ‘gaining traction’] in Framingham, the idea of hatred [actually anger] against one particular group [illegal aliens].”(65)  That ‘particular group’ is the ‘visible minority’ of Brazilians.  Lost in the rhetoric is that the townspeople are ‘mad as hell’ that the Brazilians, who are nearly all illegal aliens, are degrading their ‘quality of life’ and ruining their town.

In the typical support given to illegal alien groups, the church has said:  “Today they’re against the Brazilians, tomorrow it will [be] against someone else . . .  This is not a group to defend Brazilians, but to defend the right of people to belong to the community [even it they are there illegally].  People have the right to express their opinions, but that doesn’t give them the right to threaten people or to say things that are not appropriate or untruthful.”(65)

You’ll notice no specific quotes about what those threats or untruths are, only innuendo.  It is surprising that they didn’t explicitly use the ‘N’ word . . . Nazis!  It’s just another example of attempts to silence the debate by calling the opposition racist, xenophobes, etc. and not allowing them the opportunity to rebut the accusations or accusers.

Of course, as usual, completely left out of the conversation is the fact the that the town of Framingham, MA has been inundated with Brazilian illegal aliens.  Anyone of minimal intellectual capacity, knows that the numbers of Brazilians in the town could not possibly have come there legally.  The Brazilians have completely overrun the town.  It was a physical impossibility for so many of them to arrive, in the time frame they did, and be there legally.  Everyone knows that, but no one from officialdom is doing anything about it.  In the meantime the quality of life for the residents of Framingham is rapidly disintegrating, and the anger about it roils.

So what do the town officials do?  They bend over backwards to invite “representatives from all ethnic groups [will that include the White ethnic group?] in the community to be part of a group of town officials, civic leaders, church pastors and representatives from the MetroWest Chamber of Commerce” to figure out how to pander to the illegal Brazilians.  Not how to respond to the demand by the legal citizens that the illegal aliens be denied taxpayer services, but to pander to the illegal alien Brazilians.(65)

Wake up Americans.  Being an American can no longer be a spectator sport.  Fight back!  Whine, snivel and complain in every way possible.  If you don’t know how to do that, just emulate the Hispanics, they’re very good at it.  Pay attention, and vote in the politicians who will insist that our immigration laws be enforced!!!

4.  “The meeting at Foundry United Methodist Church near Logan Circle [DC] marked an effort to address an issue that has roiled the region:  the crowds of day laborers, many of them here illegally, who flock to street corners seeking work. . . .  ‘Please help us,’ begged Claudio Delgado, 35, a Nicaraguan who seeks work each morning with a crowd of immigrants at 15th and P streets NW.  ‘We suffer every day.  Imagine how difficult it is to change bosses every day’ . . .  ‘We are afraid to call the police, because we are illegal,’ said Anacleto, a 34-year-old laborer, whose last name is being withheld because of deportation concerns.”(66)

To Claudio . . . go home and you won’t have those ‘problems.’  And, does the church know that the immigration law states that their building is ‘harboring’ illegal aliens and is subject to legal penalties for doing so?

Another sad story . . . it seems that due to recent ‘gentrification’ of the area, those poor illegal aliens are losing their staging area for soliciting day laborers.  Community organizations are working to get them “a permanent staging area for the District’s day laborers.  Several Washington suburbs have set up such sites, often supported by public funds, to provide clean, organized places for workers to seek jobs.”

Oh, isn’t that nice.  At taxpayer expense the ILLEGAL ALIENS will have a “clean organized place” for them to seek work.  A warning to the town . . . providing day labor centers is a criminal violation of immigration law and theft of taxpayer dollars.

Francisco Pacheco, a regional day-labor organizer, gave a presentation on how the workers could set up a center — from writing up a mission statement to creating short-term work contracts that employers would fill out.  Immigrant advocates offered to help the workers get started and raise funds.”(66)

You did notice that they are ‘immigrant advocates’ not ‘illegal immigrant advocates’ as they in fact are!  You should also know that there is a national network of day labor centers for illegal aliens.  They even have their own web site here:  http://ndlon.org/memberorgs.htm.

Abel Valenzuels, director of the UCLA center for the Study of Urban Poverty “speculated that about three-fourths of all day laborers are undocumented [illegal aliens].”(60)

Silvia Nava, supervisor for the CASA of Maryland Employee Rights Project said that her “center is part of a network of 125 facilities that helps day laborers find work across the country . . .  They [illegal aliens] are people who have a right to find a job.  They come here because the economy in their countries aren’t working.”  CASA “makes it a point not to ask whether the worker is legal.  ‘That’s the responsibility of the employer to ask.’”(60)

Isn’t it outrageous that these people who are illegally aiding and abetting aliens can say that they have a RIGHT to find a job.  THEY HAVE NO SUCH RIGHT!  They are here illegally.  They are guilty of criminal felonies.  So is Nava, the center director.  And, again we see that it is somebody else’s responsibility to ask about their legal status.  Just like you constantly hear that it is “the federal government’s responsibility to enforce immigration laws.”  We are a country of laws but nobody enforces or obeys those laws.  With those values and attitudes we are slip-sliding towards anarchy.

“Advocates say the centers can resolve residents’ complaints about the proliferating outdoor sites, where day laborers sometimes urinate in public, leave trash or pester passing women.  The centers have been controversial, however, with residents of some suburbs strongly opposed to using tax dollars to help people who might be in the country illegally.”  Wouldn’t the better solution be that they are rounded up and returned to their country of origin since they are here illegally?  Wouldn’t that solve the problem immediately and save the taxpayers money to boot?(66)

What the advocates have failed to understand is that ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens in their pursuit of work here in America is a criminal violation of our immigration laws that will garner them up to five years in prison for EACH offense.  Not to mention the theft of taxpayer dollars that will be spent harboring them in a building and enabling them to find work, an egregious affront to every hard-working American.

5.  At the Christ Fellowship of Atlanta church, “The Rev. Julian Herrera, of Norcross [GA] says Jesus would not harshly judge immigrant [illegal aliens] that cross the U.S.-Mexican border looking for work.  The way people can glorify God is to lend these people a hand instead of persecuting them.”(67)

“Herrera, a native of Mexico, became a Christian in Atlanta 15 years ago.  He later returned to Mexico and studied at an Assembly of God seminary.  He became a pastor and returned to the United States in 1999 at the invitation of a church in Marietta.”(67)  The Rev. Charles Strong rents space at Christ Fellowship of Atlanta to Herrera for his Spanish-speaking congregation.  Does the reverend know he is breaking immigration laws by providing a building that harbors illegal aliens?

“Earlier this year [2005] Herrera went to Washington with other Hispanic pastors organized by a group called CONLAMIC — the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders — to lobby for immigration reform and driver’s licenses for those without immigration documents [illegal aliens].”(67)  What ever happened to the separation of church and state?  Aren’t you outraged that Hispanic and Latino clergy are advocating for illegal aliens.  Fight back!

Manuel Mendo, [a] Baptist pastor from El Salvador, [at the same forum] said the laws of God are greater than the laws of man.  Mercy is one of the most important acts a Christian can show.”(67)

David Jenkins, who teaches at the Chandler School of Theology at Emory University, [who] has worked with refugees and says helping the stranger is central to Jesus’ message . . .  Jesus was constantly breaking a lot of the cultural norms of his tradition.”(67)  Ah, but does that include committing the criminal act of ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens and disobeying our immigration laws?  Does David Jenkins believe it is okay to break the law?  Is that what he teaches at Emory University?

Gregory Howard, chairman of the Gwinnett County Republican Party, listened to Herrera [and said] . . . ‘What he’s saying is we’re not children of God and we’re not Christians if we don’t allow this [massive invasion of illegal aliens], I’m deeply offended by this.’”(67)  It seems that at least one person in the audience got it right!

6.  The Rev. Julio Barquero, of the Centro Cristiano Fellowship in Sherwood, AK has said:  “Little Rock is the border between Mexico and the U.S., . . . [n]ot Texas anymore — Arkansas.  Texas has been conquered by Hispanics.”(68)  Has their arrogance ‘got your goat’ yet?  Are you mad enough to fight back?  Are you going to sit back and let the Hispanics take over America?

“Barquero explained that Latinos in Texas have networks and institutions to help them navigate in society, whereas the Latino population in Arkansas is struggling because it is so new.”(68)  What he means is that Arkansas has been newly occupied by the illegal alien hordes invading our country and now they want to ‘reconquista’ more than the mythical territory of Aztlan.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, “Forty to forty-nine percent of all immigrants in Arkansas are undocumented [illegal aliens].”(68)  Take Note:  That means that figuratively, every other person of the ‘visible minority’ you see in the towns of Arkansas is an illegal alien!  Wake up America, look around your communities.  Pay attention to what is happening today in America.  We are being overrun by a ‘migrant army’ of Hispanics who WILL, by their sheer numbers, divide America into two cultures, languages and societies.

The Rev. Barquero also “started a program that issues identification cards to undocumented [illegal alien] Latinos in conjunction with the Sherwood Police Department.  With the IDs issued at the church, miracles have happened.  He says the cards enable Latinos to purchase cars, obtain insurance, and even eventually quality for state drivers licenses.  Church officials will issue a card to anyone who can produce a birth certificate or other form of identification from his or her native country, and Barquero says they have distributed 4,500 IDs, all of which bear the seal of the Sherwood Police Department.”(68)

Well now, there’s a perfect case that requires local American citizens to step forward and demand that the local police stop breaking the law by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens.  Demand that they end such a travesty of illegal behavior.  Tell them to stop sanctioning illegal behavior and facilitating criminals!  If necessary, band together and hire a law firm to sue them.  Several firms come to mind:  Judicial Watch, FILE (Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement), the Washington (DC) Legal Foundation (WLF), and the Mountain States Legal Foundation.

Carlos Cervantes, the state director of LULAC said:  “The reason that they [Latinos] enjoy Arkansas is that they enjoy the small towns.  They just feel real comfortable here.”(68)  I just bet they do!  The Mexican ‘migrant army’ has already penetrated even deep into America.  Remember that Cervantes considers the border of Arkansas to be the border to Mexico because Texas has already been conquered!  Are you angry yet?  Get involved in your towns.  Fight back!

Even more troubling for Arkansans is that, according to Cervantes“Arkansas has the second-fastest-growing Hispanic population in the country, which puts it on the crest of the next wave of Latino migration [illegal alien occupation by the ‘migrant army’] that is following initial settlements in Texas, California, and other states.  As a result, the Mexican government has closed its consulate in New Orleans and is opening one in Little Rock.”(68)

Cesar Compadre, a professor at the UAMS colleges of pharmacy and public health founded La Casa, a non-profit organization that “serves as a bridge between Latinos and Arkansas institutions that want to interact with Latinos.  It helps Latinos with everything from simple orientation services, such as getting their electricity connected, to more complicated situations, such as how to obtain a kidney transplant.”(68)

The Catholic Diocese of Little Rock also provides services such a “free bilingual medical clinic and offers to help with the immigration process.  Sheila Gomez, who handles Latino outreach for the Catholic Diocese, says that most people are misinformed about the realities of life as an undocumented [illegal alien] immigrant.”(68)

The Mosaic Church of Little Rock, a self-described multi-ethnic, economically diverse church to which Elisabeth Ortega is a member says:  “They don’t have driver’s licenses because they are undocumented [illegal aliens].  Their kids can’t go to college because they don’t have social security numbers [untrue] and can’t get loans [also untrue].  Even with [free] medical care, it is amazing how far behind Little Rock is in providing translators.  I had to take a person to the doctor and translate for them.”(68)

Gee, isn’t that they way non-English speaking persons were helped before the government required taxpayer-financed multi-lingual help everywhere and everyplace in America?  Churches, family, friends, neighbors or children used to step in and do those things.  Now the ‘nanny state’ does it for them even when they are here illegally.

Ms. Ortega goes on to say that “the goal of Mosaic is to integrate the Latinos with the greater community by providing a place for them to feel comfortable and accepted.”(68)  That goal is the antithesis of what it should be, which is to obey the law and not ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens who have invaded our country and are able stay here because they are facilitated and protected by churches like Mosaic.

What on earth is happening in Little Rock?  The Hispanics shills in Little Rock, along with their facilitators are busy pushing their wants and needs with no respect or allegiance to American laws, values, culture, language or society.  All they care about is their racist agenda of Hispanic and Latino political and economic dominance, which they intend to achieve by any means necessary!  Sadly, and most unfortunately, with the help of a ‘fifth column’ that includes many, many religious institutions and leaders as well as unsuspecting, naive, non-Hispanic American citizens.

These Religious Institutions and Their Members are Fostering Chaos and Anarchy:

Clearly the government of these United States, has abdicated all responsibility and efforts to stop Mexico’s ‘migrant army’ from invading our country.  Working in tandem with our ‘do-nothing’ government, religious institutions are working vigorously as a ‘fifth column’ to foster and promote a state of lawlessness.

Mexico’s ‘migrant army’ is an overwhelming Hispanic invasion that is defying our laws and sovereignty, balkanizing our country, degrading our schools, hospitals and jails, corrupting our culture, society and national language, as it metastasizes throughout the United States.

Doesn’t it strike you as outrageous that the one institution in our society that most Americans rely upon to provide moral stability and integrity, turns out to be the ‘prime mover’ towards anarchy?

What can be done to remedy the problem?  Speak out loudly and clearly about what you know to be corrupt calls for lawlessness by your churches, its hierarchy, ministry and especially among your fellow parishioners.  Only then can the brakes be applied to stop this spiral towards chaos and lawless disorder.

All the above religious entities exhibit a misguided naiveté that is frightening, inappropriate and beyond all rational reasoning or understanding.  For churches to proselytize ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens is simply ‘beyond the pale’ as well as criminal behavior.  However, above all else, their lack of concern for law-abiding Americans, most of whom are also Christians, is unforgivable.  Their collective unconscionable actions are at best . . . grievous, repugnant and amoral!


Note 1:  All bracketed [ ] notations within quotes, are added for clarification.
Note 2:  All underlining and italics, within the quotes and elsewhere, are done for emphasis.
Note 3:  For an excellent source on The National Council of La Raza (The Race), LULAC, MALDEF, MEChA, and the ACLU, et al go to:  http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/viewGroups.asp?catId=6.


 

References

  1. Robert Justich and Betty Ng, CFA, The Underground Labor Force Is Rising To The Surface, steinreport.com, January 23, 2005, http://www.steinreport.com/BearStearnsStudy.pdf.
  2. Jim McTague, Going Underground:  The shadow economy is about to top $1 trillion – at a great cost to many, barron’sonline.com, January 3, 2005, http://www.nbpc1613.org/news/010105_BARRONS_Underground%20Economy.htm.
  3. Jeffrey S. Passel, Estimates of the Size and Characteristics of the Undocumented Population, The Pew Hispanic Center, March 21, 2005, http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/44.pdf.
  4. Fred Ebel, Illegal immigration invasion numbers, May 30, 2005, Desert Invasion – U.S., http://www.desertinvasion.us/data/invasion_numbers.html.
  5. Fred Ebel, How many illegal aliens are in the U.S.?, January 3, 2005, theamericanresistance, http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/illegal_alien_numbers.html.
  6. Lawrence E. Harrison, The silence about immigrants, September 29, 2004, The Boston Globe, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/09/29/the_silence_about_immigrants/.
  7. NewsMax.com, Feds Undercount Illegal Aliens, March 16, 2001, theamericanresistance.com, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/3/15/202322.shtml.
  8. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Catholic Church & Charities Illegally ‘Aid and Abet’ Aliens, August 17, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/CatholicChurch.html.
  9. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Hospitals ‘Mugged’ by Illegal Aliens, July 12, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Mugged.html.
  10. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Hispanic Racism Rears its Ugly Head in US Congress, September 22, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Baca.html.
  11. American Patrol, The Scourge of MEChA, Accessed October 4, 2005, americanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/MEChAindex.html.
  12. Stanford University Editorial Board, MEChA:  Social Justice Group or KKK?, October 24, 2003, stanfordreview.org, http://www.stanfordreview.org/Archive/Volume_XXXI/Issue_2/Editorial/editorial1.shtml.
  13. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 1), April 22, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism1.html.
  14. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 2), May 2, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism2.html.
  15. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 3), June 21, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism3.html.
  16. Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), Arizona Law Denying Benefits To Illegal Aliens Upheld, August 9, 2005, MSLF, http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/press_releases.cfm?pressreleaseid=477.
  17. Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), Court Dismisses Challenge To Arizona Law Denying Welfare For Illegal Aliens (Friendly House v. Napolitano), August 11, 2005, WLF, http://www.wlf.org/upload/081105LURS.pdf.
  18. Letter from Senator John McCain, (4 Million divided by 365 equals 10,000+ per day), dtd. February 10, 2004, http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/letter_mccain_2004feb10.html.
  19. Travis Loller, Mexican Consulate to offer ID cards during annual visit, The Island Packer, June 25, 2005, http://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/story/4973488p-4545103c.html.
  20. Megan Hawkins, Mexican officials to issue ID cards, passport in D.M., September 25, 2005, The Des Moines Register, http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050925/NEWS08/509250338/1001/RSS01.
  21. Gabriela Rico, Waiting for documentation:  Almost 2,000 people line up at a mobile Mexican Consulate in Salem [OR], March 6, 2005, The Statesman Journal, http://159.54.226.83/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050306/NEWS/503060325.
  22. Jennifer Delson and Anna Gorman, Mexico’s ID Makes Major Gains in U.S.:  Use of the matricula consular is helping many to assimilate, which is one reason those against illegal immigration oppose the card’s use, September 27, 2005, Los Angeles Times, http://www.americas.org/item_22206.
  23. Andorra Bruno and K. Larry Storrs, Consular Identification Cards:  Domestic and Foreign Policy Implications, the Mexican Case, and Related Legislation, March 31, 2005, Congressional Research Service, http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/news/2005,0406-crs.pdf.
  24. Eduardo Porter and Elisabeth Malkin, Way North of the Border, September 30, 2005, New York Times, http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~border/list_articles/REQ_Sept30_WayNorthoftheBorder.html.
  25. Carlos Loret de Mola, The Great Invasion:  Mexico Recovers Its Own, July 20, 1982, americanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/RECONQUISTA/GreatMexInvasDeMola820720.html.
  26. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, azteca.net, http://www.azteca.net/aztec/guadhida.html.
  27. Monterey County Historical Society, Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, mchsmuseum.com, http://www.mchsmuseum.com/treaty.html.
  28. Map of the Territory of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, loc.gov, http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/ghtreaty/ghmap.jpg.
  29. KFOXTV.com, LULAC opposes NM Minutemen, June 11, 2005, kfoxtv.com, http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/4598324/detail.html?rss=elp&psp=news.
  30. John Kirsch, Hispanic voters gaining political clout, October 3, 2005, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX), http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/12804653.htm.
  31. Katherine Rosenberg, Home Depot picketed over illegal immigrant allegations, June 12, 2005, desertdispatch.com, http://www.desertdispatch.com/2005/111859538421537.html.
  32. National Council of La Raza, Funders, Accessed September 18, 2005, nclr.org, http://www.nclr.org/section/about/funding/.
  33. KVOA News, Some Hispanics decry group’s border patrols, June 12, 2005, KVOA.com, http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=3464545.
  34. Discover the Network, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), April 15, 2005, http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6189.
  35. Amy Waters Yarsinske, All for One and One for All:  A Celebration of 75 years of the League of United Latin American Citizen (LULAC), June 9, 2004, lulac.org, http://www.lulac.org/about/history.pdf, (See page 85 or .pdf page 87).
  36. League of United Latin American Citizens, LULAC Corporate Alliance, Accessed September 21, 2005, lulac.org, http://www.lulac.org/links.html#anchor551841.
  37. Discover The Network, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), April 15, 2005, http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6156.
  38. The American Patrol, Contributors to MALDEF – 2002-2003, theamericanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/MALDEF/Contributors-2002-2003.html.
  39. Jim Trageser, Charging ‘racism’ easier than facing issues, September 1, 2005, North County Times (CA), http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/09/01/news/columnists/trageser/19_52_248_31_05.txt.
  40. Joseph Fallon, Funding Hate:  foundations and the radical ‘Hispanic’ lobby, Fall 2000, The Social Contract, http://www.thesocialcontract.com/cgi-bin/showarticle.pl?articleID=910&terms.
  41. Hector Carreon, USA officials seek to declare “border vigilantism” a federal hate crime, August 15, 2005, La Voz de Aztlan (Please be advised that this is a reconquista anti-White, anti-American, Mexican racist, hate-filled website), http://www.aztlan.net/hate_at_the_border.htm.
  42. Fifth Column, Accessed October 3, 2005, infoplease.com, http://www.infoplease.com/dictionary/fifth+column.
  43. The Concise Law Encyclopedia, Aid and Abet, Accessed September 11, 2005, thelawencyclopedia.com, http://www.thelawencyclopedia.com/term/aid_and_abet.
  44. Brad A. Greenberg, Christians chide governor, May 9, 2005, The San Bernadio (CA) Sun, http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0%2C1413%2C208~12588~2860855%2C00.html.
  45. Sharon McNary, Churches target governor — Immigration:  A state group wants him to end his support of the Minutemen Project, May 11, 2005, The Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA), http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_D_churches12.f29a.html.
  46. Brainy Dictionary, definition of anarchy, Accessed September 13, 2005, Brainy Dictionary, http://www.brainydictionary.com/words/an/anarchy130036.html.
  47. United States Code, Title 8 – Aliens and Nationality, Chapter 12 – Immigration and Nationality, Subchapter II – Immigration, Part VIII – General Penalty Provisions, Section 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens, As of January 6, 2003, findlaw.com, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/8/chapters/12/subchapters/ii/parts/viii/sections/section_1324.html.
  48. The Concise Law Encyclopedia, felony, Accessed September 11, 2005, thelawencyclopedia.com, http://www.thelawencyclopedia.com/term/felony.
  49. Stephen Dinan, Bishops back aid to immigrants, May 11, 2005, The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050510-113801-4424r.htm.
  50. KFOXTV, Catholics Back Illegal Immigrants?, 2005, kfoxtv.com, KFOXTV, Catholics Back Illegal Immigrants?, 2005, kfoxtv.com, http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/4693373/detail.html?rss=elp&psp=news.
  51. Sara Ines Calderon, Church organizing anti-Minuteman campaign:  Majority of City Commission would support resolution against border militia group, September 5, 2005, The Brownsville (TX) Herald, http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/ts_more.php?id=66899_0_10_0_M.
  52. Michael Easterbrook, Latinos rally for change:  As population soars, Hispanics call for better quality of life, August 15, 2005, The News and Observer, http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/2723184p-9160955c.html.
  53. Matthew Barakat, Hispanics flock to Virginia diocese, August 13, 2005, The Washington Times, http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050812-101702-9976r.htm.
  54. John Darling, Mexican residents gain ID benefits:  Consular recognition aids citizenship effort, May 1, 2005, Mail Tribune, http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2005/0501/local/stories/16local.htm.
  55. Michael Fisher, Disaster aid urged for illegal migrants –PLEA:  The leader of the Inland Catholic diocese decries limits on help for noncitizens [illegal aliens] in need, September 22, 2005, The Press Enterprise (Riverside, CA), http://www.pe.com/breakingnews/local/stories/PE_News_Local_D_barnes23.1d9a1c58.html.
  56. Cardinal urges governor to sign SB 60, September 30, 2005, The Tiding (CA), http://www.the-tidings.com/2005/0930/drivers.htm.
  57. Heather Rutz, Nun takes issue with Beck’s illegal immigration plans, October 5, 2005, The Lime News (OH), http://www.limaohio.com/story.php?IDnum=18320.
  58. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., NJ AG gets Illegal Alien Law Enforcement RIGHT!, September, 28, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/NJ-AG.html.
  59. Edward Hegstrom, Minutemen critics urge immigration reform:  Religious and political leaders say changes would end the appeal of border watchers, July 13, 2005, The Houston Chronicle, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1441724/posts.
  60. Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Day Labor Centers Stir Controversy Throughout Country, August 30, 2005, FOX News, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167641,00.html.
  61. Stephen Dinan, Church eyes immigration reform, August 10, 2005, The Washington Times, http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050809-105557-9543r.htm.
  62. The Orlando Sentinel, Lutherans support immigrants, August 16, 2005, orlandosentienl.com, http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-cfbriefs16_605aug16,0,7337964.story.
  63. Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), Immigration, Accessed October 6, 2005, elca.org, http://www.elca.org/socialstatements/immigration/.
  64. Marv Knox, We can’t wait for immigration reform, January 21, 2005, Baptist Standard, http://www.baptiststandard.com/postnuke/index.php?module=htmlpages&func=display&pid=2877&print=1.
  65. Liz Mineo, Group forming in support of immigration, May 5, 2005, The MetroWest Daily News, http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=97758.
  66. Mary Beth Sheridan, Workers, Neighbors begin Dialogue:  Community Weighs Day-Labor Center, September 22, 2005, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/21/AR2005092100893.html.
  67. Mary Lou Pickel, Illegal immigration polarizes Christians, August 10, 2005, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, http://www.ajc.com/search/content/auto/epaper/editions/wednesday/atlanta_world_249f3477845e900f00ff.html.
  68. Warwick Sabin, Border state:  The support network struggles to catch up with Arkansas’s status as a prime destination for Latino immigrants, June 23, 2005, Arkansas Times, http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=9d1b5464-9e3e-45a1-9b9d-6317983ac984

Copyright © Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., 2009, All Rights Reserved

http://www.alipac.us/f12/our-government-aiding-abetting-illegal-aliens-104323/

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/category/obama-the-enemy-of-america/