Muslims Across America In Full Celebration Mode Commemorating The “hard work” of Senator Rubio


Who needs to be concerned with Muslim terrorists running around when you have Marco Rubio up at the White House actively furthering their cause for a complete takeover of our country!

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

Muslims across America were in full celebration mode commemorating the “hard work” of Senator Rubio, where EmgageUSA put out the following public statement:

Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream.”

Anti-blasphemy laws have been a massive victory for Muslims across the world, as now followers of Islam can have people who speak out or criticize their religion thrown into prison. We continue to hear horrifying stories coming out of Europe and Canada where citizens are being rounded up and jailed for speaking out against Islam, as courts are now turning their backs on their very own citizens in order to pander to the very group of people who want to kill them. Now breaking news is confirming that a Senator Marco Rubio has just gotten a bill passed in the Senate that will make speaking out against Muslims a crime, in a shocking move of treason towards the American people that will leave you speechless.

We had enough damage done to our country under the tyrannical rule of Barack Hussein Obama, who was nothing more than a domestic terrorist who worked tirelessly to further the mission of radical Muslims around the world. Well now it appears as though Marco Rubio has just picked up the torch of treason, as he has just been exposed as the TRAITOR who spear-headed a bill that will make speaking out against Islam illegal, which was written by a Muslim terror organization with direct ties to Al Qaeda. Creeping Sharia reported:

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

Muslims across America were in full celebration mode commemorating the “hard work” of Senator Rubio, where EmgageUSA put out the following public statement:

Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream.”

So how bad has Rubio screwed over the American people? Here’s exactly what’s in the resolution which the Senate has just passed:

“…Federal law enforcement officials, working with State and local officials… to expeditiously investigate all credible reports of hate crimes and incidents and threats against minorities in the United States and to hold the perpetrators of those crimes, incidents, or threats accountable and bring the perpetrators to justice; encourages the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies to work to improve the reporting of hate crimes; and… encourages the development of an inter-agency task force led by the Attorney General to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities…”

What’s chilling is that THIS BILL HAS PASSED THE SENATE and has now gone on to the House, where almost the exact same verbiage was introduced as H.Res. 257. If passed, this law will create an “inter-agency task force” that will then go after people who speak out against Muslims, who are a “protected class.” H.Res. 257 urges:

“…the development of an inter-agency task force led by the Attorney General and bringing together the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities”. The House Resolution was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on April 6 and from there it was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations on April 21.

Why the hell is Marco Rubio selling us down the river in order to further the cause of radical Islam? The Muslim groups he worked with to get these bills passed are not “peaceful” Islamists either. EmgageUSA’s leader Khurrum Wahid is currently on a terror watch list for his extensive work with Al Qaeda, and as a lawyer, Wahid defended Omar Ahmed Abu Ali, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush!

FYI: Muslims are also pushing hard to be classified as a ‘protected minority/class’ when they should be classified as a Terrorist Group. This is absolutely unbelievable!

See House Legislation here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/257

See Senate Resolution  here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-resolution/118

Advertisements

OUTRAGEOUS Feds Released Nearly 20K Criminal Aliens in 2015; 200 Convicted of Murder


As seen on Happening Now

Illegal Immigrant Goes Free After Fatal DUI Crash, May Now Be in Honduras

124 Illegal Immigrants Released by Obama Admin Later Charged With Murder


Lawmakers are grilling Obama administration officials on why Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has released more than 86,000 criminal aliens in the past three years.

The House Oversight Committee hearing comes after the release of statistics for 2015, which show that ICE released 19,723 criminal illegal immigrants, rather than deporting them.

The more than 64,000 convictions include 196 that were homicide-related, 216 for kidnapping, more than 600 sex offenses and more than 800 robberies, Fox News chief congressional correspondent Mike Emanuel reported.

ICE releases nearly 20,000 criminal aliens in 2015.The Center for Immigration Studies reports that those released totaled more than 8,000 convictions for violent crimes.

ICE releases illegal criminals 20000 feds 2015

The map above shows the releases state by state, with California and Texas leading the way.

Critics say the highest levels of the Obama administration are to blame for the lax policies.

“The law is crystal clear. You are making these discretionary choices in releasing these people out into the public and they’re committing more crimes. I don’t understand why you don’t deport them,” said committee chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

Emanuel said lawmakers are scheduled to hear from family members of those killed by illegal immigrants.

At the hearing, ICE director Sarah Saldana pushed back, arguing that the issue stems from countries like Haiti refusing to take back their criminals.

Saldana said it’s “absolutely unforgivable” to suggest that ICE law enforcement agents are choosing to put criminals back on the streets.

Watch Emanuel’s report above.

Last night on The O’Reilly Factor, Bill discussed the ongoing problem with Rep. Trey Gowdy, who chaired a House hearing last week on the issue.

O’Reilly asked Gowdy about the status of Kate’s Law, which the host proposed last year after the murder of Kate Steinle in San Francisco.

Watch the interview below.


CA Cops: Illegal Immigrant with 4 Prior Arrests Charged in Fatal Sex Attack

Former Border Patrol Officer: U.S. Heroin Epidemic Fueled by Illegal Immigration

Father of Man Killed by Illegal Immigrant: San Fran Sheriff ‘Belongs in Jail’

New Security Concerns After Syrian Refugees Reach Texas Border


http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/04/28/feds-released-nearly-20k-criminal-aliens-2015-200-convicted-murder

Globalists Continue To Push The Lie That Treaties Are Binding Upon The United States Citizens: Treaties Can Be Nullified By States Or Statutes & Obama Removed From Office!


Our Senate and President (not to mention that he is a usurper) lack lawful authority to enter into a treaty that conflicts with The Constitution so even signed and ratified it would not be a valid treaty.

Reblogged from Political Vel Craft dated July 2012

The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people. That lie is: “Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution“.

The Second follow-up lie is this one: “A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside”. HERE ARE THE CLEAR IRREFUTABLE FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that

1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution. 2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution. And last, 3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others. When you’ve read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone — anyone — claims that treaties supercede the Constitution. Help to dispell this myth. “This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” – Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.

This case involved the question: Does the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (treaty) supersede the U.S. Constitution? Keep reading. The Reid Court (U.S. Supreme Court) held in their Opinion that,

“… No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. Article VI, the Supremacy clause of the Constitution declares, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all the Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land…’

“There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification which even suggest such a result…

“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights – let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition – to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power UNDER an international agreement, without observing constitutional prohibitions. (See:Elliot’s Debates 1836 ed. – pgs 500-519).

“In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article VI. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and Senate combined.”

Did you understand what the Supreme Court said here? No Executive Order, Presidential Directive, Executive Agreement, no NAFTA, GATT/WTO agreement/treaty, passed by ANYONE, can supersede the Constitution. FACT. No question! At this point the Court paused to quote from another of their Opinions; Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258 at pg. 267 where the Court held at that time that,

“The treaty power as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or a change in the character of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent.”

Assessing the GATT/WTO parasitic organism in light of this part of the Opinion, we see that it cannot attach itself to its host (our Republic or States) in the fashion the traitors in our government wish, without our acquiescing to it. The Reid Court continues with its Opinion:

“This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which MUST comply with the Constitution, is on full parity with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict, renders the treaty null. It would be completely anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute that must conform to that instrument.”

The U.S. Supreme court could not have made it more clear : TREATIESDO NOT OVERRIDE THE CONSTITUTION, AND CANNOT, IN ANY FASHION, AMEND IT !!! CASE CLOSED. Now we must let our elected “representatives” in Washington and the State legislatures know that we no longer believe the BIG LIE… we know that we are not bound by unconstitutional Treaties, Executive Orders, Presidential Directives, and other such treasonous acts.

[Note: the above information was taken from Aid & Abet Police Newsletter, with limited revision. P.O. Box 8712, Phoenix, Arizona. Acknowledgment given to Claire Kelly, for her good assistance and in depth treaty research. The use of this information is not to be construed as endorsement of Aid & Abet Police Newsletter. Claire Kelly is a trusted and knowledgeable friend. – CDR]

__________________________________________

Here’s what Thomas Jefferson said on the right to renounce treaties:

“Compacts then, between a nation and a nation, are obligatory on them as by the same moral law which obliges individuals to observe their compacts. There are circumstances, however, which sometimes excuse the non-performance of contracts between man and man; so are there also between nation and nation. When performance, for instance, becomes impossible, non-performance is not immoral; so if performance becomes self-destructive to the party, the law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others”.

pg 317 – “The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson,” A. Koch & Wm. Peden, Random House 1944, renewed 1972. Jefferson also said in a letter to Wilson C. Nicholas on Sept. 7, 1803, Ibid. pg 573

“Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction [interpretation]. I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of the treaty making power as boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.” ______________________________________________________________Further evidence:

Excerpt from a letter from U.S. Senator, Arlen Specter, (R. Penn.) to constituent, November 3, 1994.

“Dear Mr. Neely:”Thank you for contacting my office regarding the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. … I have signed on as a cosponsor of Senator Bradley’s resolution [SR 70, which urges the president to seek the advice and consent of the Senate for ratification] because I believe that the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child is an appropriate step in the direction of promoting the well-being of children throughout the world. [he goes on to mention concerns that the treaty would subjugate familial and parental responsibility to an international entity, which he denies] “… Secondly, the Convention would not override the U.S. Constitution; rather, as in the case of any treaty, any provision that conflicts with our Constitution would be void in our country… “

[CDR Note: It is our belief that Arlen Specter would not have been as truthful regarding Constitutional Supremacy over treaties if he had a clue that this letter to a constituent would have found its way into the hands or eyes of the public.]

_________________________________________________

Logical deduction:      No law or treaty supersedes the Supreme Law of the Land.  ‘Supreme’… meaning ‘highest or greatest’.  What is higher than highest or greater than greatest, other than our Creator?  The Constitution acknowledges our God-given, unalienable rights, and secures those rights in that acknowledgement.         The Constitution gives the US Senate authority to ratify treaties with other nations. Americans have been propagandized into believing that those treaties become the supreme law of the land superseding the Constitution. Let’s examine this deception closely and dispel the myth once and for all. Article VI of the Constitution states:

Clause 2 – “This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution [of any state] or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.”Clause 3 – “The senators and representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executives and judicial officers, both of the United States and the several states, shall be bound by oath of affirmation to support this Constitution .”

Laws made in pursuance of this Constitution are laws which are made within the strict and limited confines of the Constitution itself. No federal, state, or international law, rule or bureaucratic regulation and no state constitution can supersede B or be repugnant to B this Constitution.

Treaties made under the authority of the United States… the United States (federal government) was authorized by and on behalf of the people and in pursuance of this Constitution to enter into certain treaties with other governments. The United States (federal government) obtains its authority solely from the Constitution. It would be ludicrous to think that it has the power to circumvent (via treaties) that which grants it its authority.

In Clause 3, it is made clear that every elected official, both federal and state, is bound by oath to support this Constitution. Who can rightly, and genuinely claim to be given the power to destroy that which they are elected and sworn to uphold?

The powers granted by the Constitution cannot sanely be construed to provide the authority to usurp, pre-empt or eradicate it.       The U.S. Supreme Court as cited above correctly ruled that the supremacy of the Constitution overrides treaties. It should be noted that if any Court, be it a State, Federal or the U.S. Supreme Court, should ever rule otherwise, the decision would be repugnant to the Constitution and the ruling would be null and void.

The answer to this question is self-evident.

The Constitution authorizes the United States to enter into treaties with other nations B the word Anation@ although not explicit, is certainly implied. The United Nations is an Organization – a Global Corporate Bureaucracy.The ‘experts’ in international law, commerce, banking, environment, etc.; and a cadre of alleged conservative / Christian-conservative leaders — lawyer, Dame of Malta, Phyllis Schlafly being a prime example — have been spewing forth propaganda to instill and further the myth of ‘treaty-supremacy’ for decades.

Their ‘expertise’ is an illusion created apparently with hopes to instill a sense of inferiority in the ‘common man’ (their term) so we will all defer to their superior intelligence. Let’s not go there. Here’s a perfect example of ‘expert’ propaganda on the supremacy question: On April 11, 1952, Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles (cfr), speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky said…

“Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law. Under our Constitution, treaties become the supreme law of the land…. Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, …can cut across the rights given the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”

Mr. Dulles is confused about the People’s rights. To repeat an earlier statement of fact: the Constitution doesn’t ‘give’ us rights. The Constitution acknowledges and secures our inherent, Creator-endowed rights. What Creator gives, no man can take away. The Dulles brothers worked (lied) long and hard to firmly establish the treaty-supremacy myth. And they realized it would have to be done by deceit — propaganda. Admittedly by propaganda.

“There is no indication that American public opinion, for example, would approve the establishment of a super state, or permit American membership in it. In other words, time – a long time – will be needed before world government is politically feasible… This time element might seemingly be shortened so far as American opinion is concerned by an active propaganda campaign in this country…”

Allen W. Dulles (cfr) from a UN booklet, Headline Series #59 (New York: The Foreign Policy Association., Sept.-Oct., 1946) pg 46.      The question of “nationhood” in reference to the United Nations seems to have been addressed by the errant Congress.  A quick fix apparently took place in the U.S. Senate on March 19, 1970. According to the Anaheim (Cal) Bulletin, 4-20-1970, the Senate ratified a resolution recognizing the United Nations Organization as a sovereign nation. That would be tantamount to recognizing General Motors as a sovereign nation. Are we beginning to get the picture? Case Closed Sweet Liberty

Second Important Article About The Treaty Myth.

Treaties do not override the Constitution.
By Don Fotheringham In anticipation that our president may sign one or more treaties that conflict with the U.S. Constitution’s limited grant of power, several voices of alarm are contending that a treaty can override, or in effect amend, our Constitution. Although that view has gained some currency, it is a myth that contradicts the intent of those who framed the Constitution. And it violates any reasonable interpretation of that document. Origin of the Myth The frightful idea that U.S. treaties with foreign nations supercede the Constitution has been regularly promoted since the Eisenhower era.
 divider gif
1 It was given a big boost in 1952 when Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), made the following statement:
divider gif
2 … congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution, whereas treaty laws can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, can take powers away from Congress and give them to the President; they can take powers from the states and give them to the Federal Government, or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given the people by the Constitutional Bill of Rights.
 divider gif
3 It would be hard to find a more preposterous assertion. Sadly, however, many citizens have been led to believe that treaties do override the Constitution. Could anyone really think our founding fathers spent four months in convention, limiting the size, power and scope of government, and then provided for their work to be destroyed by one lousy treaty?
 divider gif
But one might object, what about Article VI? Article VI establishes the supremacy of U.S. laws and treaties made within the bounds of the Constitution. It is called the Supremacy Clause, because it places federal laws and treaties that are made pursuant to the Constitution above state constitutions, laws. and treaties. Some Important History This was needed because, contrary to their agreement under the Articles of Confederation, certain states had violated their trust and entered into treaties with foreign powers.
 divider gif
During the convention,
Madison said: “Experience had evinced a constant tendency in the States to encroach on federal authority; to violate national Treaties, to infringe the rights and interests of each other.”
divider gif
4 State-made pacts often conflicted with peace and trade treaties wanted by the Confederation Congress for the benefit of all thirteen states, making it hard for Congress to consummate better agreements with other nations. This also led to fierce contention between the states in their effort to monopolize the import of goods from Europe and the Indian tribes. But more serious dangers arose in matters of security, for should one state be at war with a foreign power while a sister state honors its peace agreement with the same enemy, the security of the entire Confederation would be threatened.
divider gif
5 In an effort to head off such dangers, the Confederation Congress frequently attempted to nullify
state-made treaties in the state courts (there were no federal courts). But as might be expected, the state judges ruled inevitably in favor of their own states, pursuant to the state laws and constitutions.
divider gif
The 1787 Convention corrected that problem by making certain only federal treaties would be recognized as valid. In this light, it is not hard to understand why paragraph two of Article VI is worded as follows: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. Upon ratification of the Constitution, the state treaties were nullified.
divider gif
Thereafter, only federal treaties were recognized as supreme, regardless of any remaining state provisions to the contrary. Moreover, under the new Constitution the founders established a Supreme Court, granting it original jurisdiction over treaty controversies, and thereby removing from state judges jurisdiction over treaty cases. In addition to quelling strife among the states, Article VI accomplished a major objective of the Convention, mainly that of placing the United States in a position to speak to the world with one voice.
 divider gif
United States treaties are created when proposed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The power of the President and the Senate, in their treaty-making capacity, was never intended to be a power greater than the Constitution. Citizens who met in the state ratifying conventions (1787 to 1790) to examine with great care the provisions of the proposed Constitution had a correct understanding of the Supremacy Clause.
divider gif
During the ratifying debates, James Madison answered questions regarding the new national charter and commented on the extent of the treaty-making power under Article VI: “I do not conceive that power is given to the President and Senate to dismember the empire, or to alienate any great, essential right. I do not think the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power must be consistent with the object of its delegation.”
 divider gif
6 In the same discussion
Madison said: “Here, the supremacy of a treaty is contrasted with the supremacy of the laws of the states. It cannot be otherwise supreme.” That is, a treaty cannot in any other manner or situation be supreme. Thomas Jefferson: “I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of treaty- making to be boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.”
divider gif
But we do have a Constitution. Its life and viability depend entirely on the small number of citizens who 1) understand the document, and 2) who equally understand the forces at work to destroy it. At this point enough time has passed, and enough false teachings have been promulgated, to cause modern Americans to fall for the treaty power ploy. It is not surprising that John Foster Dulles, a ranking member of the CFR, should in 1952 circulate the treaty-power heresy that yet prevails.
divider gif
It is time for serious reflection on the words of Edmond Burke, “The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.” Those who seek to preserve the sovereignty of the United States must work energetically to expose the Dulles delusion — the ridiculous idea that treaties have intrinsic powers greater than the Constitution.
 divider gif
1 In decades immediately prior to the Dulles speech, Supreme Court decisions had already begun to enunciate the idea (see, for example, Missouri v. Holland in 1920 and United States v. Pink in 1942).
 divider gif
2 Dulles actually made this statement during a speech in Louisville on April 2, 1952, shortly before Eisenhower appointed him Secretary of State.
 divider gif
3 Quoted by Frank E. Holman, Story of the Bricker Amendment, (New York Committee for Constitutional Government, Inc., 1954), pp. 14, 15.
divider gif
4 The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Farrand, Vol. I, p. 164.
 divider gif
5 Benjamin Franklin’s Plan of Union, America, Vol. 3, p. 47.
 divider gif
6 Debates on the Federal Constitution, Jonathan Elliot, ed., second edition, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Company, 1907, Vol. III, p. 514. Robert Welch University
divider gif
Founding Fathers

divider gif

Related articles:

Texas orders its volunteer groups to stop resettling ISLAMIC Syrians


Fri. Nov. 20 2:55 pm

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has instructed volunteer organizations that settle international refugees to immediately stop helping Syrians in the wake of the deadly Paris attacks — even though it may not have the authority to do so.

The Health and Human Services Commission wrote Thursday to volunteer and community groups reminding them of a “statutory duty to cooperate and consult” with the state. The letters were released to the media on Friday.

“If you have any active plans to resettle Syrian refugees in Texas, please discontinue those plans immediately,” according to the letter, which was signed by Chris Turner, the agency’s executive commissioner.

It also asked that groups notify state authorities immediately if they learn that federal authorities are proposing resettlement in Texas using their services, adding “we reserve the right to refuse to cooperate with any resettlement on any grounds.”

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and more than half of his gubernatorial counterparts have said their states will not take in Syrians fleeing their war-torn homeland, citing security concerns. Authorities in Washington, D.C., say resettlement programs are federally funded and involve volunteer and private organizations — meaning states can’t dictate policy.

Abbott has countered that by pointing to specific language in federal law.

“The narrative out there is absolutely false when they say governors have no authority to do anything about this, because we do,” Abbott said Wednesday on the Fox News Channel. “Under Section 8 of the U.S. Code, Section 1522, it specifically authorizes the states to control these refugee programs.”

Legal experts, however, have told The Associated Press that that statute spells outs only states’ rights to consult in the process. The governor’s office said Friday it preferred not to comment beyond Abbott’s previous statement.

While questions of authority linger, the effects of the order already are being felt in Texas.

Relatives of Syrians who live in the Dallas area had been scheduled to resettle their families there Dec. 4. But Anne Marie Weiss-Armush, who heads the nonprofit refugee-assisting organization DFW International Community Alliance, said the letter from Texas health authorities means federal officials likely will send them to another state.

“It’s not going to stop the Syrians,” she said of Texas’ orders. “These refugees have been in the vetting process two years. They’ve been investigated multiple times and they are still coming. But they will not be coming where they are not wanted.”

Weiss-Armush said the suburb of Richardson had been an ideal place since relatives were willing to take them in. She said her organization will put beds that had been donated for the family to use in storage.

“It reminds me of the Japanese-Americans that were resettled in the desert,” Weiss-Armush said, referring to U.S. internment camps from the 1940s. “Innocent families that were caught up in World War II.”

Also Friday, a family in Connecticut accepted a married couple and their 5-year-old son who fled Syria in 2011 and had been set to resettle in Indiana. The refugees were reassigned after Gov. Mike Pence ordered state agencies to halt resettlement activities.

Source: http://m.lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2015-11-20/texas-orders-its-volunteer-groups-stop-resettling-syrians#gsc.tab=0

TEXAS BOOTS OBAMA DONT MESS WITH TEXAS

Our Government: Aiding And Abetting Illegal Aliens
By: Chris Freind, The Bulletin
04/02/2008

The following is the mission statement of the Philadelphia Prison System: “To provide a secure correctional environment that adequately detains persons accused or convicted of illegal acts; to provide programs, services and supervision in a safe, lawful, clean and humane environment, and to prepare incarcerated persons for re-entry into society.”

Unfathomably, the last part of that policy makes no distinction between American citizens and illegal aliens. Both are released back into our society, courtesy of the incompetent United States government.

It’s good to be an illegal immigrant in America!

Try following this “logic”: an illegal alien gets convicted of a crime, serves his sentence, and is then handed over to the Immigration service. More often than not, instead of being deported, the ILLEGAL alien (the key word being “illegal”) is actually released back on the American streets. Why? Because many countries don’t want their own convicts repatriated, so they deny or delay the process of deportation. Since the Supreme Court generally limits the detention of these aliens to 180 days, they go free.

Several small points come to mind:

1. Why are any countries dictating to us what we can and can’t do with their citizens who are in this country illegally?

2. Since undocumented criminal aliens are rearrested an average of eight times (and we’re not talking about stealing a candy bar; most offenses are robbery, assault, murder, drugs and sexual crimes), has it dawned on our political leaders that their inaction places every American in grave danger?

3. Perhaps most ironic, by instituting such a policy, our government is, in fact, committing a crime every time it releases an illegal alien. Aiding and abetting illegals is unquestionably against the law, and by definition, setting them free inside America qualifies as both.

A 2006 Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Report estimated that most of the 302,000 deportable criminals admitted into state and local facilities in 2007 would be released rather than removed at the end of their sentence. Given the there are estimated to be between 300,000 and 450,000 illegal aliens in federal, state and local jails already, and that the taxpayer cost to house these people is staggering, those with minor offenses should have the charges dropped and immediately deported to their country of origin. But how do we do this if the other countries are not cooperative? By refusing to roll over to the whims of other nations. It’s time to play hardball.

Playing Hardball: Deportation Legislation

Sen. Arlen Specter has taken the lead on this issue by introducing a bill which would deny foreign aid and suspend visa issuances to countries which delay or refuse to repatriate. This common sense legislation should be passed swiftly by both houses and signed into law for the immediate benefits it will produce.

In addition to making the streets safer by deporting illegals (who broke the law to get here in the first place), the bill would make a significant dent in our prison overcrowding problem (the Philadelphia prison system houses 8,700 inmates, even though it was only designed for 6,200). Too many criminals are having their sentences reduced or suspended altogether because there is simply not enough capacity within our correctional facilities, placing our law-abiding citizens in jeopardy yet again. It also sends the message that crime does pay since the odds of serving a full sentence are remote.

There will also be a huge savings to taxpayers. Since the daily cost to house prisoners is very expensive (the Philadelphia Prison System cost is $91/day), it doesn’t take a math genius to figure out how much will be saved by jettisoning the illegal alien deadweight. The numbers speak for themselves.

It is time America starts taking care of itself first, placing its citizens ahead of illegal invaders. Our economic future, our physical security, and continued respect for the rule of law depend on it. For theses reasons, prompt passage of the Specter legislation is a necessity.

http://www.alipac.us/f12/our-government-aiding-abetting-illegal-aliens-104323/

According To Federal Law, Many Of Our Politicians Should Be In Prison For Aiding And Abetting Illegal Immigration July 4, 2014

Posted on October 1, 2014

We truly live in a lawless nation.  According to federal law, it is illegal to encourage or induce illegal immigrants to enter the United States, and it is also illegal to either be engaged in or aiding and abetting the “domestic transportation” or “harboring” of illegal immigrants.  In other words, many of our top politicians and a whole host of federal officials should be going to prison.  The following comes directly from the Justice Department

Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection 1324(a)(3).

Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien.

Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.

Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.

Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any 12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless disregard of alienage is sufficient.

Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both. With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii), domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5 years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. §  1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment is provided for third or subsequent offenses.


Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)
“Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.”

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or

* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or

* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens

It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an alien for a fee, knowing the alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an alien knowing that the alien is unauthorized to work. Employers may give preference in recruitment and hiring to a U.S. citizen over an alien with work authorization only where the U.S. citizen is equally or better qualified. It is unlawful to hire an individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days’ advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. Day laborers or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verfication of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the alien labor. The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer’s work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual’s accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.

IT IS ILLEGAL FOR NONPROFIT OR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, REGARDLESS OF CLAIMS THAT THEIR CONVICTIONS REQUIRE THEM TO ASSIST ALIENS. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.

Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any alien who is in the United States in violation of law. HARBORING MEANS ANY CONDUCT THAT TENDS TO SUBSTANTIALLY FACILITATE AN ALIEN TO REMAIN IN THE U.S. ILLEGALLY. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien’s illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien’s entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that “encouraging” includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.

The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years’ imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years’ imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years’ imprisonment.

Enforcement

A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.

State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer’s consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.

RICO — Citizen Recourse

Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, AND CAN INCLUDE NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONS.

Tax Crimes

Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In additon to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/AidAbetUnlawfulSec8USC1324.html

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/according-to-federal-law-many-of-our-politicians-should-be-in-prison-for-aiding-and-abetting-illegal-immigration-july-4-2014/

Boycott: List of Companies Pushing for Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/boycott-list-of-companies-pushing-for-amnesty-for-illegal-aliens/

Chris Freind can be reached at cf@thebulletin.us
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?a … 4977304592

Churches Criminally ‘Aid and Abet’ Illegal Aliens
By Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/Churches.html
October 12, 2005

Dated 2005

U.S. Flag Carrying out a well publicized invasion plan, Mexico has declared as heroes the millions of poverty stricken ‘migrants’ they have encouraged to invade America.  Mexico has brazenly deployed a massive ‘human tsunami’ of its poorest citizens as a ‘migrant army’ to ‘reconquista’ the land that America purchased by treaty agreement after winning the Mexican-American War.  The illegal alien invasion of America now totals 20 million, 90% of whom are Hispanics.(1-7)  ‘Without firing a shot’ Mexico intends to win their ‘de facto‘ war by leveraging those ‘migrant’ masses to gain enough political power to shove their balkanizing, racist Hispanic agenda down the throats of America!

How Mexico Wages Its ‘de facto’ War:  1.  By creating Mexican laws allowing dual citizenship;(8)  2.  By legislating the right to vote in Mexican elections by absentee ballot from America, approved in 2005;(8)  3.  By promoting nationalism and Hispanic racism.  The Mexican government, their Hispanic-American shills, sponsor programs and practices that “upholds the political or economic domination of one race over another or others;”(8)(9)  4.  By working surreptitiously in concert with Hispanic organizations and politicians here in America, Mexico pursues its ‘reconquista’ of American land, by actively and blatantly promoting the purist form of racism there is!(8)(10)

As the Hispanic anti-white, anti-American organization of MEChA, the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán), or ‘Mechistas’ as they call themselves, has arrogantly proclaimed:  For those in the race everything. For those outside the race nothing.(11)(12)  A racist, bigoted and arrogant statement which displays ignorance of the fact that the Hispanic raza (race), is NOT a race.

5.  By ‘Meddling’ in America’s Affairs, in Defiance Of Our Laws:  The Mexican government, continuously and blatantly colludes with Hispanic politicians, individuals, groups and organizations here in America, who act as their shills.  Sadly and outrageously, nearly all of those Hispanic organizations receive funding, some in the millions, from the Ford Foundation, and many, many corporate ‘others’, who want to keep that cheap labor flowing.(8)

Mexico’s shills and operatives include the racist Hispanic organizations like The National Council of La Raza, MALDEF, LULAC and MEChA, in addition to the ACLU, which is headed by an Hispanic, and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and numerous American politicians and individuals of Hispanic descent.(13-15)  They constantly work ‘behind the scenes’ using our courts, Hispanic advisory counsels and other political access to eliminate any and all actions that might thwart or stop the illegal alien invasion of America that continues at a rate of 10,000 a day.(8)(16-18)

Issuing Matricula Consular Cards(21)

6.  By Using Roving Mexican Consulates To Undermine Our Laws.  Their consulates travel around America issuing matricula consular or Mexican ID cards to illegal aliens.(19)(20)  Shamefully, the roving consulates are frequently provided taxpayer funded public buildings in which to do their ‘dirty’ work!  Disgracefully, they are often provided government officials who instruct illegal aliens on how to take advantage of our country’s ‘public benefits,’ and federal welfare and tax systems.(21)  Everyone is aware that only the ‘migrant army’ of illegal aliens needs those Mexican issued IDs because those that are here legally have official U.S. documents validating their presence.

The Mexican illegal aliens take those ID cards and use them to access our banks, obtain drivers licenses, mortgages, credit cards and other rights and privileges, that are usually reserved for American citizens.  “The matricula’s growing acceptance by U.S. businesses is both a measure of how entrenched illegal immigrants are becoming in American society and of how eagerly the marketplace is courting them.”(22)  Permission to accept the Mexican ID was granted by the Treasury Dept. over the objections of the FBI and the Justice Dept.(23)  Ergo . . . money wins out over law and order!

How Massive is the Mexican Consulate System in America?

Mexico has just opened their 46th consulate in St. Paul, Minnesota.  For the Minneapolis-St. Paul and surrounding suburbs “it [the consulate] was already a latecomer to a bustling Mexican-American community that included, according to consular official, 22 churches offering services in Spanish, 9 Spanish language newspapers, 3 tortilla makers and 9 Hispanic – mostly Mexican soccer leagues.”(24)

The Mexican consulate official chides his country’s efforts by saying:  ‘We are responding to the needs of the Mexican community’ [of mostly illegal aliens], said Nathan Wolf, the new consul.  ‘We are just following the movement of people.’(24)  Don’t you wonder how they are able to keep up since Mexicans are overrunning hundreds and hundreds of our cities and towns all across America?

They call Minneapolis the new Axochiapan, said Ramiro Hernandez, a successful businessman who arrived in the United States illegally 20 years ago from Axochiapan, a small town in the central Mexican state of Morelos.  Mr. Hernandez proudly proclaims that:  ‘Ninety percent of the population there [in Axochiapan] has people over here [in America].  Kids come here as soon as they come of age.’”(24)

Isn’t that heartening for Americans to hear that the ‘right of passage’ for their Mexican children is to illegally enter the United States, illegally reside in the United States, and then illegally work in the United States, while our government does nothing to stop the massive invasion by a foreign countryJust think . . .  Axochiapan is but one tiny little Mexican town in the whole country of Mexico.  Multiply that by all the other poverty stricken towns in Mexico and you have some idea of how massive the invasion is.

“Municipal officials in Axochiapan estimate that at least a third of the population has moved [to America].  The mayor wants to HONOR the migrants [illegal aliens] with a 10-foot statue of a man carrying a bag and leaving his wife and two children behind.”(24)  You can bet that she won’t be there long.  As soon as the ‘migrant’ gets set up, she and her children will ‘migrate’ too, along with many others from their typical Mexican extended families.

As for the enforcement of our borders, “Once I was caught five times,’ said Arnulfo Pliego, 44, a migrant [illegal alien] from Axochiapan who first came to the United States in 1989, and has shuttled between Morelos and Minnesota for the last nine years.  ‘I said to myself, ‘I must pass, I must pass,’ and I passed.’”(24)

Like Arnulfo, the illegal aliens try repeatedly because they know that once past the border they are ‘home free’ and can, like Arnulfo arrogantly give their name, age and location to the newspaper with absolutely NO FEAR of reprisal!  That does say a lot about ours laws and their enforcement.  The words that come to mind are “it’s a JOKE!”

Oh, by the way . . . Mexico plans to open its 47th consulate in Little Rock, Arkansas by the end of 2005.

While President Bush condemns Mexico for their ‘racist’ post office stamps, he is totally silent about the massive ‘human tsunami’ of illegal aliens crushing our country.  In fact he supports them:  By outrageously and erroneously calling our patriotic Minutemen ‘vigilantes;’ by identifying illegal aliens euphemistically as ‘undocumented’ (as if they were just missing some kind of paperwork); and by praising illegals for their ‘family values’ while they break MANY of our immigration laws; while he constantly proclaims that “they are here to do the work Americans won’t do,” an outright lie and euphemistic camouflage for the invasion.

Bush’s solution to the invasion is to rename the ‘migrant army’ . . . ‘guest workers’ and give them a path to citizenship as a reward for illegally entering, residing and working in America.

A Warning For the Un-Anointed:  Be prepared to find that much of the Hispanic and Latino rhetoric and propaganda that is discussed below will be deliberately obfuscating, duplicitous, hypocritical and dishonest!  These groups wage blatant ‘in your face’ campaigns of disinformation by calling themselves ‘immigrant advocacy groups’ or ‘immigrant-rights groups’ or ‘human-rights groups!’  They routinely call legislation that eliminates ‘public benefits’ for illegal aliens, as “anti-immigrant.”  You will notice, they NEVER say anti-illegal immigrant.  The word “illegal” is NOT part of their vocabulary!  Without fail, they deliberately obfuscate by using the term “immigrants” when we all know that the real issue is ILLEGAL immigrants.

How Mexico Expects to Win the War:

1.  First They Brazenly Announced their Mexican Manifesto in 1982 in a prominent Mexico City newspaper.  It is very eerily ‘Osama like’ and diabolically clear to all today, that Mexico has planned and then executed a ‘stealth war’ by invasion and colonization of the United States of America.  Incredibly, the manifesto is a carbon copy of the illegal alien invasion and balkanization that American citizens have been forced to endure for more than two decades.  Now, in 2005 there is overwhelming evidence that we are being invaded by a foreign country.

Illegals Climbing Border Wall 2.  Mexico Arrogantly Declares its ‘Migrant Army’ War PlanA peaceful mass of people, hardworking, carries out slowly and patiently an unstoppable [illegal alien] invasion, the most important in [Mexico’s] human history.  You cannot give me a similar example of such a large migratory wave by an ant-like, stubborn, unarmed, [illegal aliens] and carried on in the face of the most powerful and best-armed nation on earth [America].”(25)

But neither barbed-wire fences, nor aggressive border guards, nor campaigns, nor [un-enforced American Immigration] laws nor police raids [not unless you commit ANOTHER crime] against the undocumented [illegal aliens], have stopped this movement of the masses that is unprecedented in any part of the world [true].(25)

In 1950 they were called ‘Pachucos’ (half-breeds) [then came the ‘wetbacks’ then the ‘braceros’]; today they are called ‘Chicanos.’  They have marked social and family characteristics, agility for adapting to the environment and for conquering a great region [America], once primitive and virgin, that belonged to our fatherland [Mexico] and we lost it [via the surrender Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo after America won the Mexican-American War(26)(27)(28)].  But it seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without the firing of a single shot, nor requiring the least diplomatic action [because both presidents, Bush and Fox, have colluded to do so], by means of a steady, spontaneous, and uninterrupted occupation.(25)

The occupation of America by Mexico’s poorest of the poor, clearly elaborated and detailed in the Mexican Manifesto announced in 1982, demonstrates a de facto war that has been carefully planned, artfully directed and facilitated by both governments, then executed without a single change or deviation from the original plan.

Just as with Osama’s fatwahs, our government has ignored the pronouncements of the Mexican Manifesto and has egregiously and outrageously facilitated Mexico’s ‘stealth’ war by not enforcing our immigration laws.

3.  By Engaging Hispanic and Latino Organizations as Their Shills:

NOT ONE National Hispanic organization in America is against the illegal alien invasion.  NOT ONE! Not LULAC, nor the National Council of La Raza (The Race), nor MALDEF, nor MEChA, etc.  How do they ‘show their colors?’  For example:  Paul Martinez of LULAC, the League of United Latin American Citizens, says . . . “they vehemently oppose the minuteman project.”(29)  Well . . . of course they do!  They oppose any and all efforts to stop the massive illegal alien invasion by Hispanics and Latinos.  They applaud, encourage and facilitate the lawlessness.  It’s all part of their racist agenda to increase their numbers in order to obtain political power and domination.(30)  Wake up America!

The National Council of La Raza [The Race, which is NOT a race] the International Socialist Organization [Communists], the Southern California Human Rights Coalition [Includes illegal aliens] and the San Gabriel Valley Neighbors for Peace and Justice [that’s Peace and Justice for illegal aliens, but not for you!] say that there should be no borders and therefore no illegal immigrants!”(31)  The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is an anti-American, pro-illegal alien lobby that receives funding from a very long list of American corporations, which can be found here:  (32)

LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens) a Mexican-American organization that lobbies:

  1. For Racial preferences.
  2. For The legalization of illegal Hispanic immigrants.
  3. Against the military on the border.
  4. Against English-Only in America.(34)

They received $1 MILLION from the Ford Foundation in 2004 when William Clay Ford wrote:  “As the largest and oldest Hispanic organization in the United States, LULAC continues to provide its more than 115,000 members with the necessary tools to be leaders in their communities.  Great people making a difference in the community help all of us learn, appreciate and respect the contribution of everyone in our diverse citizenry . . .  Ford has been a member of the LULAC Corporate Alliance for over a decade, and we are proud to support its many programs and initiatives.”(35)(36)

Is funding the LULAC organization Ford’s way of keeping the cheap labor in-coming to run their assembly lines?  Or, more darkly, is it retribution for those workers who revolted over the inhumanly sped-up original Ford assembly line?  Just a couple of questions to try and understand why the Ford Foundation would continue to fund an organization that is so blatantly anti-American in EVERY agenda they pursue.  Is there any other explanation for such promotion, continuous support and funding by the Ford Foundation?  It seems that profit the only motivation that ‘fits.’

LULAC’s Chapter President, Paul Martinez, La Cruces, New Mexico, funded by the corporate dollars of the Ford foundation and many, many others, has denounced the Minutemen patrols by saying:  “They are hiding under the American flag claiming to be good patriots, but they are actually promoting racial hatred.”(33)

Is that how you see the Minutemen, those true American Patriots ‘doing the job our government won’t do,’ by guarding the borders?  If they do drape themselves in the American flag, is that a negative?  Then again, be sure and take notice whenever the Minutemen are challenged by Hispanic and Latino protesters, you’ll notice that those protesters wrap themselves . . . in the Mexican flag.

United Day Laborers' March

LULAC Lobbies Against English-only in America:

In their response to the 1996 US House of Representatives English Language Empowerment Act, passed to mandate the use of the English language as the unifying, singular language of America, LULAC said:  “English-only is incredibly divisive [not unifying?] because it sends the message that the culture [language is a culture?] of language minorities [illegal aliens] is inferior and illegal.  With a dramatic increase in hate crimes and right wing terrorist attacks in the United States, the last thing we need is a frivolous bill to fuel the fires of racism.”(34)

So, LULAC thinks it’s ‘racist’ to want to have a single unifying language, our own native language, as the ‘official language.’  Think about it . . . here in America, the Hispanics are telling us we should not have such a law, that it is ‘frivolous.’  How outrageous can you get?  Americans are not entitled to mandate our national language as ‘official’ but they are free to shove their Spanish language down our throats, everywhere and everyplace?  Aren’t they trying to make our own English language ‘inferior’ and ‘illegal’ to us?!  Remember, ‘press one for English!’

Why do we need to have such a bill in the first place?  Wake up America!  Everything our legislature tries to do to keep America from turning into another Spanish speaking Hispanic dominated country . . . is racist.  LULAC’s efforts to quash such legislation is part of their Hispanic agenda to push aside and replace our English language with theirs.  Get the picture?

Illegal Alien Invaders

MALDEF (The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund):

MALDEF was created and financed by the Ford Foundation, receiving more than $25 MILLION.  In 1998 alone, MALDEF received $9 MILLION from the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation combined.(37)  It will probably make you sick, but you can read more about how corporate and foundation wealth finances mass immigration, see below at this number:  (38)

MALDEF frequently uses their funding to attack legislation like Arizona’s Prop. 200.  They often legally challenge and attack many other anti-illegal alien issues and legislation.  They operate closely with Mexico, who stays behind the scenes ‘pulling the strings.’  They also push for legislative action that will advance their racist Hispanic agendas.

MALDEF’s Agenda Is Much the Same as the ACLU’s: (37)

  1. Open Borders.
  2. Free College Tuition for Illegal Aliens.
  3. Lowered Educational Standards to Accommodate Hispanic Students.
  4. Opposes English-Only Laws.
  5. Voting Rights for Criminals.
  6. Lawsuits to Try and Stop Arizona’s Prop. 200.

Of course they want the borders to remain ‘open’ so that millions more Hispanics and Latinos can enter.  As time goes on, and the ‘migrant army’ grows ever larger, their collective voices will become louder and louder and even more stridently racist, oppressive and offensive.  Are you prepared to fight back?

Free college tuition?  Can Americans get a free college education?  The Hispanics are drunk with the power they have been granted by our courts who have ‘legislated from the bench’ to give them free K-12 education.  Why else would they think they should now be entitled to a free college education?  Don’t you see how arrogant and demanding they are now?

What will they be like when they have insinuated themselves into our legislatures, police departments, mayoralties, schools, jails, hospitals, courts, churches, local townships and advisory boards, etc. . .?  Just let your mind wrap around those thoughts!

Yes, lower those academic standards to accommodate Hispanic students who can’t keep up, while at the same time penalizing our American children by dragging them down to their level.  It’s just another example of the Hispanics shoving their agenda down our collective throats to the detriment of our children.  Let’s just dumb down the our children’s education by denying them access to quality education and devastate their future lives and prosperity so that those illegal aliens, who shouldn’t be here, can compete.  Insanity reigns!

Why give voting rights to criminals?  Because Hispanics have a disproportionate number of criminals in our jails already.  Thirty-three percent of the federal prison population are illegal aliens.

MEChA:  “For the race everything. For those outside the Race, nothing!”  And . . . of course the ‘race’ they speak of is Hispanic/Latino (which is NOT a race).(12)  Why do we Americans put up with being called ‘racist’ and ‘anti-immigrant’ by the truly racist pro-illegal alien Hispanic and Latino organizations, when we demand our immigration laws be enforced against illegal immigrants?(13)(14)(15)  Why do we let them get away with such hypocritical accusations of racism?

Author Jim Trageser got is right when he said:  “There is no possible logical, intellectual or even moral pretense for supporting illegal immigration . . .  What other ammunition do they have in their arsenal [except the charge of racism]?  There aren’t any logical, sensible arguments in favor of simply opening our borders.  Not even the most vehement supporters of illegal immigration will make that argument straight out.”

“Instead, they criticize Border Patrol sweeps, assail efforts to deny benefits to those who break the law to get here, ridicule those who would watch the border voluntarily.  And when they are called on the emptiness of their argument, when they are asked why immigration law shouldn’t be enforced in a logical even-handed manner, they resort to a burned-ground campaign of character assassination against anyone who openly advocates in favor of [the] fuller enforcement of our immigration laws.”

“The purpose of calling someone a racist isn’t to change his mind or heart, not to convince others of the veracity of your position.  The point is to distractTo intimidate!  . . .  To silence!”(39)

Unfortunately all of the above Hispanic and Latino organizations have become powerful because they have been organizing and infiltrating our society and infrastructures for decades and are heavily funded by the Ford Foundation and many others which has allowed them to “successfully and aggressively promote hatred of the history, identity, culture, language, and laws of the United States.”(40)

These racist organizations are working hard to change America into an Hispanic nation.  Their goal is to inalterably change and dominate our culture, society and language.  Think about how that will impact you, your children, and your children’s children!  Wake up America!

4.  By Using American Political Shills To Work for Them:

In August, 2005, “[a]t the offices of the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriores (Department of State of the Republic of Mexico), four USA elected officials [paid with American taxpayer dollars and supposedly representing the interests of American citizens] said that they will be asking the Bush Administration to declare “border vigilantism” against Mexicans and other immigrants along the US/Mexico border prosecutable and punishable under the federal hate crime laws.  The officials said that the violent activities by groups like the Minutemen vigilantes [a bald-faced lie, with no proof], the KKK, white supremacy militias and other similar groups are totally unacceptable.”(41)

You did, of course, notice how they lumped all the groups together in one sentence so that one would have to ‘parse’ their attack and separate one group from the other, in order to challenge them to substantiate the charges.  It was a sneak assassination of America’s Patriotic Minutemen, through implication by association, to other UNCONNECTED groups.  Pay attention to their tactics.  They use them all the time.  As for just who those Mexican shills are, read on.

County Supervisor of San Bernardino, California Josie Gonzales, the Mayor of Lynwood, California Ramon Rodriguez, [born in the town of Valparaiso, Zacatecas, Mexico] Borough President of The Bronx Adolfo Carrion, [Puerto Rican] and Delaware State Representative Joseph E. Miro [Born in Cuba] held the press conference at the offices of the SRE in Mexico City and directed most of their statements at President George W. Bush . . . [and said] “Bush should openly declare that he is against the Minuteman Project, and more aggressively criminalize their activities, which are motivated by anti-immigrant [sic, anti-illegal-immigrant] sentiments that are racist and paranoiac.”(41)  You did of course notice the word ILLEGAL is missing between anti and immigrant.  A common tactic employed by ALL the pro-illegal alien racists.

Sadly, American Churches Are Helping Mexico Win the War:

What is truly outrageous about the Mexican ‘stealth war‘ is that many churches and their ‘leaders’ in America have become the proverbial ‘fifth column’ for Mexico’s reconquista war, by ‘aiding and abetting’ the Hispanic tidal wave.  By functioning as a ‘fifth column’ they are “a group of people who act traitorously and subversively, out of a secret [or not so secret] sympathy, for the enemy of their country.”(42)  Our American churches are hard at work ‘aiding and abetting’ the overwhelming Hispanic illegal alien invasion that has trampled our laws and sovereignty, balkanized our neighborhoods, and insidiously and deviously corrupts and degrades our unifying English language, American culture, and society.

What is ‘Aiding and Abetting?’  To actively, knowingly, or intentionally assist another person [such as an illegal alien] in the commission or attempted commission of a crime.(43)  For example ‘aiding a abetting’ illegal aliens to enter, reside and work in America, involves three separate felonies.  Or, for the clergy to ask or engage their ‘flock’ or other sympathizers to join together in church sanctioned projects or events to criminally ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens, is inviting them to participate in a conspiracy, which is an additional felony.

Those churches and religious followers who ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens here in America are legion.  This article reveals only one thin slice of the ‘aid and abet’ pie.  This research reveals that churches of many denominations have deliberately violated multiple federal immigration laws in pursuit of their ambition to ‘help’ illegal aliens as part of their religious affiliations and misguided beliefs.  They have engaged in this lawbreaking . . . repeatedly, endlessly and unchecked by our government!

Why do religious institutions, like the Catholic Church, and others, defy our immigration laws?  Why do they flaunt our laws, by enabling millions upon millions of illegal aliens to enter, reside and work in America?  Do they do so in order to ‘feel good’ about what they see as their ‘Christian duty’?  Why do pious people of the Christian faith believe it is okay for them to disobey our laws, which were created to protect and defend our country and its populous?  Do they feel that they are above the law?  By their example, does that mean that it is okay the rest of us to disobey other laws, as we chose?  As you will find below, they DO believe that they are ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAW!

Churches and religious groups who choose to defy our immigration are criminals!  It does not matter what ‘higher law’ they think they are obeying.  They are the proverbial ‘Fifth Column’ who operates out of sympathy for the ‘invading army’ of illegal aliens, by traitorously and subversively facilitating the Mexican ‘migrant army’ invasion of our country.  An Hispanic/Latino invasion that WILL, by their sheer numbers, irrevocably alter our American community.  They will divide our nation into two languages, two cultures, and two societies.  The Catholic Church and Charities, their membership along with other churches and religious zealots who think only of their ‘mission’ without regard for the rest of us . . . are traitorous criminals who are betraying their country and its citizens!

Churches and religious zealots apparently believe that they should not be bound by the immigration laws of our country.  They have taken it upon themselves to defy our laws by illegally ‘aiding and abetting’ aliens to come, enter, take up residence and work here in America.  That makes them criminals!  They also conceal, harbor and shield them from detection in houses, transport them and engage in conspiracies with others to commit those same illegal acts.  In their ‘blind ambition’ the Catholic Church, Charities and many others are committing felonies in violation of our immigration laws, because of their misguided religious fervor.  They are facilitating and perpetuating the unrelenting and exorable illegal alien invasion of our country!  Their complicity and duplicity is a national tragedy and an egregious sacrilegious disgrace!

Many church organizations such as the California Council of Churches, which represents 1.5 million members of mainstream Protestant and Orthodox churches, and the Pomona-based Progressive Christians Uniting have pilloried Governor Schwarzenegger for standing up for those American Patriots called the ‘Minutemen.’  The churches and their minions sniveled:  “We are appalled that Governor Schwarzenegger, who as our state’s chief magistrate is pledged to maintain the rule of law, has chosen instead to praise a group of vigilantes who operate outside the law, saying they’ve done a terrific job in patrolling the border with Mexico.”(44)

They go on to say:  “No responsible or moral public official would encourage citizens to take the law into their own hands, particularly on an issue that is already so laden with division and hatred.”(44)

And, still more invective:  “‘Playing on people’s fears and divisions and dropping bombshells like those [praising the Minutemen] of last week represent demagoguery, not leadership’ said the letter, signed by the Rev. John Walsh, a University of Redlands chaplain, and 149 other religious leaders.”(45)

Unfortunately . . . those churches and ‘Christian’ leaders(???) have based their entire diatriabe on a LIE!  How moral is that?  It is deemed a lie, because the Patriot Minutemen have NEVER taken the law into their own hands nor has such an accusation been proven to be true . . . EVER!

What is so outrageous about all these religious institutions that are discussed here, is that they are fostering and promoting anarchy which is the:  “Absence of government; [creating] the state of society where there is no law or supreme power [except God’s law and who enforces that?]; [it is] a state of lawlessness; [and of] political confusion.”(46)  If the churches succeed is their mission . . . they will destroy the United States of America, a nation once touted as “a nation of laws!”

The Rev. Peter Laarman of Progressive Christians Uniting said:  “We want to keep the level of violence, potential disruption and confrontation as low as possible.  The religious leaders who signed this [letter to Schwartzenegger] are trying to be peacemakers.”(44)

The pro-illegal alien churches all want ‘as little confrontation as possible’ so that they can continue to undermine our laws and sovereignty by encouraging and supporting illegal aliens to enter, reside and work here.  The question they need to be asked and answer, is . . . how much ‘peace’ will there be when America has descended into chaos and anarchy?  A condition that which will surely occur if the illegal alien invasion continues unchallenged and unabated.

Girl with Flag How To Stop the Traitorous ‘Aiding and Abetting’ of Illegal Aliens:

By Enforcing These Immigration Laws:

1.  It is illegal to “encourage or induce an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.”  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv).(47)

2.  It unlawful to aid or abet the commission of such acts.  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(II).(47)

3.  It is also unlawful to conceal or attempt to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, illegal aliens, including any building or any means of transportation.  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii).(47)

4.  It is illegal to “engage in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts.”  8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I).(47)

To ‘Aid and Abet’ is to actively, knowingly, or intentionally assist another person in the commission or attempted commission of a crime.

To engage in any of the above is a felony:  A crime is considered a felony when the specified crime carries a penalty of more than one year in prison.(48)  For the crimes listed above the maximum penalties range from five to twenty years for EACH (illegal alien) violation.  Where sentences over five years indicate additional aggravating circumstances.


How The Catholic Church ‘Aids and Abets’ Illegal Aliens:

Most unfortunately, you will find that the Catholic Church and Charities and many, many of their misguided parishioners have collectively become the largest and most blatant illegal alien enablers in this country.  They are citizens of the United States who, in direct violation of our federal immigration laws, enable illegal aliens to enter, reside and work here in America!  Everything they do in the name of their ‘Christian beliefs’ is done in defiance of our immigration laws and without any concern for the harm they are causing the rest of us hard-working, honest, law-abiding, mostly Christian, Americans.  What they do, by definition, makes them traitors, guilty of treason because they betray their country, and countrymen in order to promote an agenda of aiding and abetting illegal aliens, in direct contravention of our laws.(8)

It is particularly egregious for the Catholic Church, Charities and other church denominations to ignore our immigration laws when it results in such damaging negative effects on the ‘quality of life’ for the rest of us Americans.  What a shameful example they provide for us and our children.  Any sanctimonious justifications they might give for their illegal behavior, is unacceptable!  What they do fosters anarchy and chaos, which impacts ALL Americans.  Apparently Catholics and other religious organizations who join them, believe they are ‘special people,’ when in fact they are criminals who are shamefully and erroneously justifying their behavior by sacrilegiously cloaking themselves in the mantle of Christianity and biblical mantras.(8)

1.  In May, 2005, the “U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops announced . . . that they will ‘add the voice of the Catholic Church’ to the call for a guest-worker program, and a path to citizenship for illegal aliens in the United States.”(49)  To support that goal the Catholic Church’s ‘Migration and Refugee Services‘ has launched a controversial campaign called ‘Justice for Immigrants.’  However it seems that their campaign apparently does not include obeying the immigration laws of our country!  The campaign hopes to use God’s law to replace U.S. Immigration law.”(50)

“According to the [Catholic] church, the bible says to care for the poor, the weak and unfortunate.  The church says that includes illegal immigrants.”  “The church also wants lawmakers to develop a plan to help bring their families to the U.S. as well.”(50)

Do the math!  That means if there are 18-20 million illegal aliens here now, that figure of potential influx could quadruple to 80 million if their families are brought in under the ‘family reunification’s plan that the Catholic Church espouses.  In a country where the number of current legal citizens is 296 million . . . those numbers are a demographically overwhelming!  Of course that does not include the ‘anchor babies’ they will also produce!  To understand the depravity of this Catholic dogma, read on . . .

2.  Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, the archbishop of Washington, DC, according to the Washington Times, in May of 2005, said that religious teachings justify aiding illegal aliens . . .  “We go right to the New Testament and say, him or her who is without sin cast the first stone.  How many of us have not violated some laws, whatever they might have been — either they’re traffic laws or immigration laws or tax laws, something like that.”(49)

Perhaps some have occasionally cheated and done one, or two of the above.  You did notice that you would have to ‘parse’ his statement to agree or disagree, because many have ignored speed limits and ‘forgot’ to claim something on their taxes, but violate immigration laws?  Only illegal aliens and those who help them have done that.  That lawbreaking is in a ‘class by itself’ and does NOT begin to compare to traffic or tax lawbreaking.  Aiding and abetting illegal aliens is far more serious by comparison, not to mention that it is the kind of illegality that can have a massive impact on the rest of society, in ways that breaking traffic or tax laws do not.

Does the biblical quotation cited by the archbishop of the Catholic Church justify the promotion of anarchy in America?  Does it also sanction inciting others to deliberately ignore United States immigration laws?  How outrageous can you get?  What he suggests is ILLEGAL to do and comes with a very ‘healthy’ felony penalty that includes serious jail time.

McCarrick is encouraging his ‘flock’ to break our immigration laws by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens, all with the blessings of the Catholic Church along with reassurances that the Holy Bible gives you that permission!  Is it so important to the Catholic Church that an archbishop would twist and pervert sayings from the Holy Bible to support ignoring and defying our immigration laws, placing America on the path to anarchy?

Is their program ‘Justice for [Illegal] Immigrants‘ and its unspoken counter-mandate of ‘Injustice for Honest, Hard-Working, Law-Abiding American Citizens really that important to the church?  Or, are their programs, exhortations and blatant pandering, simply a quest for ‘instant Catholics’ that will provide a major increase in their church membership?  You can decide those answers for yourself!  Read on . . .

3.  Father Michael Seifert of San Felipe de Jesus said:  Any family in economic need has a right to immigrate, that’s our posture, if a family is hungry and the family needs work, then society should provide a way for people to do that.”(51)  Translated that means . . . it doesn’t matter that is violates the sovereignty and immigration laws of America, we the priests of the Catholic Church consider ourselves ABOVE THE LAW!

4.  St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church in Raleigh, NC Held a statewide rally for hundreds of Latinos and their advocates, which included the Catholic Church, and Ecxaida Gamez of the Episcopal Ministry of Washington in Beaufort County and Javier Garcia of the Faith Action International House.(52)

After “a mariachi band played near the church alter,” the speakers called for “laws to legalize illegal aliens,” improvement of housing conditions, and “more interpreters for Spanish-speakers [read . . . jobs for English speaking Hispanics] at public health facilities” and a “tighter partnership with community colleges.” (52)

These requests seem reasonable, until you understand that they are for ILLEGAL ALIENS who have increased the Latino/Hispanic population in North Carolina by 400% in the 1990’s, and increased an additional 35%, on top of that 400%, to an estimated 517,000 from 2000-2004.(52)  And, you can count on that explosion to continue due to the illegal alien’s high birthrates and because 10,000 illegal aliens are crossing the Mexican border and invading America, EVERY DAY!(18)

5.  Father Jose Eugenio Hoyos Director of the Roman Catholic Church’s Spanish Apostolate, in the Arlington Diocese of Virginia said:  “Where all the Hispanics are coming from, I don’t know.  Sometimes I think maybe the Holy spirit is sending them too fast.”  He said this jokingly at a press briefing.  What is not a joke, is the fact that nearly ALL of these newly arrived Hispanics are illegal aliens who have broken our immigration laws to invade America.  Of course Father Hoyos must know that he is ‘aiding and abetting’ their presence here in America, which is a crime.(53)

Father Hoyos, born in Columbia, one of 12 children, said “the church frequently hosts Salvadoran bishops and conducts mission work in El Salvador.”  Of the 160,000 Latino Catholics in just this ONE Arlington, VA Catholic diocese 64,000 are Salvadoran.(53)  Don’t you wonder how that many got here legally?  Well, as you might guess . . . they didn’t!

6.  Arlington Bishop Paul Loverde said “the roots of the Roman Catholic Church in American are steeped in immigration, and it’s important now to continue welcoming immigrants [illegal aliens] of all backgrounds to the church.”(53)  However, the bishop knows full well that 90% of the 20 million illegal aliens who have invaded America are Hispanics and Latinos and therefore mostly Catholics, so his exhortations are very disingenuous.

7.  Our Lady of the Mountain Catholic Church was used by the Mexican consulate [a FOREIGN government] to issue matricula consular ID cards to illegal aliens.  “The process . . . included a ‘carousel’ of tables, connecting locals [illegal aliens] with vital information about taxes, employment, community college classes, police and driving in the United States.”  Vincente Sixtos said, speaking through a translator from the state department of Employment, ‘It’s very important, because the identification helps with police and getting credit started with a bank account.’”  Claudia Guzman speaking through an interpreter from Rogue Community College [Oh my, the college is so aptly named], “you can’t get a license without it . . . and it will definitely be accepted at Wells Fargo to open an account.”  What can you do?  Fight back . . . take your money out of the Wells Fargo Bank wherever you live.(54)

Matricula Consular Card “Getting a bank account is key to starting a credit history, as well as sending money to relatives in Mexico [twenty billion dollars will be taken out of the American economy and sent to Mexico in 2005] . . .  We are already a bicultural community [of illegal aliens].  They’re our neighbors and we need to be aware of that and accept it.”(54)

Well, do you ‘accept it?’  If so just sit back and do nothing.  If you don’t ‘accept it’, join up with the Minutemen or any of the hundreds of anti-illegal alien groups, like the United Patriots of America, who are fighting to save America from the US government sanctioned insanity that is permitting this overwhelming illegal alien invasion of our country.

8.  “Bishop Gerald Barnes, leader of the Diocese of San Bernadino, is urging federal legislators to extend disaster aid to illegal immigrants uprooted by Hurricane Katrina, and not to deport undocumented immigrants [illegal aliens] who fled the storm-ravaged Gulf Coast.”(55)  They are criminals who have violated several immigration laws, so why aren’t we deporting them?  Can you commit several felonies and continue to remain free from jail?

Bishop Barnes goes on to say:  ‘Now is the time to serve our common humanity and not discriminate against victims of the disaster because they are not U.S. citizens,’ Barnes, the chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration, said in a Tuesday letter to federal lawmakers.(55)

‘Like U.S. citizens, noncitizens have suffered from the hurricane and its aftermath, having lost their loved ones, their homes, jobs, and possessions.  The relief they need is commensurate with the relief needed by U.S. citizens affected by the disaster, but they are in danger of being overlooked,’ Barnes wrote [to federal legislators].(55)

However, you will notice how Bishop Barnes, has cleverly dichotomized the victims into two groups when in reality there are THREE groups:  (1) U.S. citizens; (2) U.S. non-citizens who are here legally; and (3) U.S. non-citizens who are here illegally.  That is how Catholic Bishops like him and others, deviously and maliciously ‘twist and pervert’ the facts in order to deceive and corrupt your thinking and understanding about the illegal immigration issue.

Why should American taxpayers dollars be spent to support people who broke our laws to enter, broke our laws to reside here and broke our laws to work here, while at the same time, due to finite funds, shortchange American citizens and legal aliens?  Isn’t there something wrong with that picture?

It’s already an insult that illegal aliens get free education, free hospital emergency care and then some, have their babies on ‘our dime,’ who then become automatic citizens, or ‘anchor babies’ who qualify for all sorts of ‘public benefits’ including Medicaid . . . and now Bishop Barnes wants even more.  When is enough, ENOUGH? Most importantly it should be noted that the Catholic hierarchy wants what is against the law to be given to illegal aliens.

The law states that:  Undocumented [illegal aliens] and nonimmigrant [those aliens here on work, school or visitor visas] workers are eligible for noncash, in-kind emergency disaster relief such as food and shelter and emergency medical care, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.  But federal rules do not allow illegal immigrants to receive other federal aid unless a member of their family, such as a child [anchor baby], is a citizen, FEMA officials said.(55)  Does that mean if they have an ‘anchor baby’ they get cash aid for the entire family?  We will never know.  It was a question the reporter should have asked but didn’t.

9.  Cardinal Roger Mahony, has urged Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign legislation that would provide undocumented [Illegal aliens] with California Driver’s licenses . For what reason has a cardinal of the Catholic Church come out in favor of such a law?  Is the car necessary to get to Church?  Where are all those ACLU types who insist on ‘separation of Church and State’ when you need them?  Most of all . . . why should we ever think of rewarding illegal aliens, who have violated AT LEAST three of our immigration laws, by giving them driving privileges?(56)  Latest bulletin . . . Schwarzenegger, an American Patriot, refused to sign the bill.

10.  Sister Mary Jo Toll of the Catholic Diocese of Toledo recently “told the Allen Country Clergy Fellowship . . . ‘that immigration law gives no authority to local law enforcement officers to investigate immigration issues unless they are already investigating a specific crime’.”(57)  First of all, illegal aliens already ARE criminals, who have committed a series of crimes by illegally entering, residing and working here in America.  By doing so, they have committed three separate criminal felonies under federal immigration law.

In fact, Sister Toll’s statement is false on its face.  There are absolutely no restrictions that would keep local police from enforcing all laws, which of course includes federal laws.  Isn’t it a fact that local police enforce other federal laws that involve kidnapping, racketeering, and murderers that cross state lines, and so on?  Why would immigration laws be any different?  As for committing another crime before Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will get involved, that is a POLICY and manpower decision made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and is not based upon law.

Sister Toll goes on to say:  “Local police or deputies are not authorized to look for undocumented immigrants unless they are wanted for a crime. . . .  The law has so many nuances, if they’re not trained in it, they’re not competent to do that.”(57)  Here again she is wrong about local law enforcement’s sworn duties and obligation.  They are required to enforce ALL laws, including federal laws.  They cannot ‘pick and choose’ which laws they will enforce.(58)

Toll also warned that “companies would open themselves up to lawsuits by breaking federal anti-discrimination laws if they investigate one group of workers more than others.”(57)  Her threat is an attempt to apply ‘pc’ (political castration) in order to the stop law enforcement from looking for the very Hispanics that represent 90% of the twenty million illegal aliens who are already here.  You know . . . let’s not be looking at that ‘elephant’ in the room!  Yes, let’s keep doing full body searches on those 85 year old White grannies in a wheel chair, when we all know that the terrorists are all . . . males of certain age ranges, ethnic and religious backgrounds.  Insanity revisited!

Perhaps it would be helpful to know that Sister Toll is the director of the ‘Immigrant and Migrant Ministry.’  Apparently she has a ‘vested interest’ in keeping a steady stream of illegal aliens coming into our country for her ‘ministry.’  It is also patently clear that she has an agenda and a mission that involves protecting that unending supply of illegal aliens.  In order to accomplish her ‘agenda,’ she has set herself up as an ‘authority’ on law enforcement and immigration law which she clearly has twisted and perverted to ‘make her case.’  Shame on you, Sister Toll.

11.  “Catholic Archbishop Joseph A. Fiorenza and [Houston, TX] City Councilmen Gordon Quan and Adrian Garcia, said a congressional program allowing workers [Bush’s guestworker program] to come here legally would eliminate the need for groups like the Minutemen to monitor illegal immigrants. . . .  The leaders at the conference [who were] organized by The Metropolitan Organization, said they do not welcome the [Minutemen] patrols.”

Councilman Adrian Garcia, “a former Houston police officer, said HPD [Houston Police Department] would monitor the Minutemen ‘as they would the KKK, as they would the Black Panthers.’”(59)  Are you outraged yet?  Imagine . . . American patriots who want our country’s immigration laws enforced, are branded by well-funded Latino and Hispanic groups and Hispanic ex-police officers, as promoting ‘racial hatred!’  Is that how you see it?

12.  Rev. Oscar Cantu, of Holy Name Catholic Church said the following at the conference, “let’s stand up for family values” by calling for reuniting families divided by immigration.  Translation . . . he means, bring all the women and children they left behind in Mexico, etc., here to America so that they can join their illegal alien husbands.  They also arrogantly declared that “they [the conference members] represent the views of most Houstonians in calling for humane treatment of illegal immigrants.”  However, polls show that Houstonians are ‘ambivalent’ about illegal immigration.(59)

It is suggested, that their ‘ambivalence’ exists because many are afraid to speak out against illegal immigration.  Like the rest of our citizenry they have been ‘brainwashed’ by the cult of diversity and have been ‘neutered’ by pc (political castration).  Also, since many are Hispanic, they can and do face retaliation from friends, neighbors and family members who are ‘card carrying member’s of the ‘fifth column’ who support the rabid reconquistas.  They also face being racially condemned for their ‘ambivalence’ with the label of ‘coconut’ . . . brown on the outside but white on the inside.

13.  Fr. Kevin Collins, of the Immaculate Conception Church, in the predominantly Mexican east end of Houston has said:  “Its [day labors centers have] been well received — a win-win situation . . .  As a member of the executive committee of the Metropolitan Organization of the Industrial Areas Foundation, Collins helped to get private and public funding [that’s your tax dollars] to build the East End Worker Center in March [of 2005].”(60)

Fr. Collins explained that:  “First of all, if people are getting paid for their work, that’s good for the community.  It’s helped in providing a place where you don’t have a bunch of men standing on the corner, where you have little old ladies or a child threatened a bit by walking by these guys.”(60)

Reflecting on Fr. Collins comments, you must have noticed two things . . . one is that he and his group are breaking the law to ‘aid and abet’ finding work for illegal aliens.  Two . . . didn’t you wonder why ‘little old ladies’ and a ‘child’ could be ‘threatened a bit’ just ‘walking by these guys?’  Everyone knows that it is not just the old and the young passers-by that feel ‘threatened’ . . . it is everybody that passes by, school age children and women of all ages feel threatened.  It is a well-documented phenomenon.  What kind of behavior are these men exhibiting?  Guess!  These are men who shouldn’t even be here in our country.  Why should our citizenry be exposed to such behavior in the first place?

What it all boils down to is that our ‘quality of life’ is being harmed by these illegal aliens.  It needs to be stopped by enforcing our immigration laws.  American citizens should not fear walking down the streets of their hometowns by people who should be deported or sent to jail.  Lastly, Fr. Collins is participating in a criminal act by aiding and abetting illegal aliens.  Isn’t that a wonderful example, for all to see and know, that a member of the Catholic Church is a criminal who condones and supports the flaunting of our immigrations laws?

Other Churches Who ‘Aid and Abet’ Illegal Aliens:

1.  The Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), has apparently joined hands with the Catholic Church in agreement with Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick’s mantra that religious teachings justify aiding illegal aliens . . .  “We go right to the New Testament and say, him or her who is without sin cast the first stone.  How many of us have not violated some laws, whatever they might have been — either they’re traffic laws or immigration laws or tax laws, something like that.”(61)

By a vote of 900-50 taken at their annual conference in Orlando, August 2005, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, has called upon its 10,000 congregations of 5 million members to support the goal of the Catholic Church’s ‘Migration and Refugee Services‘ controversial campaign called ‘Justice for Immigrants.’(61)(62)  A campaign that apparently does not include obeying the immigration laws of our country!  And, according to KFOX TV, The campaign hopes to use God’s law to replace U.S. Immigration law.”(50)

“In practical terms, the Protestant denomination [ELCA] asked each of its 65 bishops to establish a task force to advocate for and serve immigrants in their regions.”(62)  What this means is that they have essentially asked 65 bishops to participate in a ‘conspiracy’ to ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens, which is of course a criminal violation of our immigration laws.  To understand how they plan to accomplish their work read on . . .

According to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), who is “Living in God’s Amazing Grace” (their motto) the:  Newcomers without legal documents [illegal aliens] also are among the most vulnerable.  Congregations are called to welcome all people, regardless of their legal status.  Persons who once were or now are without documents are members of our congregations, and we want them to feel and know that in the Church they are part of a safe and caring community.  We encourage bishops and synods to show their support for congregations composed of or working with immigrants who may or may not have documents.(63)

So we find another church who wants to use “God’s law to replace U.S. immigration law” and “welcome all people, regardless of their legal status”‘.  It seems that the entrenched, monolithic, established religions are all advocating anarchy.  They advocate providing treasonous help to Mexico as a ‘5th column’ by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens to come, reside and work illegally in America making them feel that “they are part of a safe and caring community” by defying our immigration laws.  How sick and pathetic is that?

2.  The Baptist Church Weighs In:

According to Marv Knox, editor of the Baptist Standard an “Hispanic Baptist pastor prompted the Baptist General Convention of Texas [BGCT] to form an immigration task force.  Out of that group’s work, both the BGCT and the Hispanic Baptist Convencion of Texas have passed resolutions urging ministry to, and justice for immigrants.”(64)  Well, there it is again . . . “Justice for [illegal] Immigrants” or ‘Injustice for Honest, Law-Abiding American Citizens!’

So now we know that the Hispanic pastors originated the quest for ‘justice for immigrants’ and the naive, gullible and ‘bleeding heart’ Baptists took up the ‘mantle’ of ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens for them.  Could it be that those ‘Hispanic pastors’ had an agenda?  And, just what could that be?  Do you suppose it had something to do with the clearly stated Mexican Manifesto and their ‘migrant army’?

As for the Baptists:  Both conventions stress, “The Bible teaches and the ministry of Jesus instructs that believers are to minister to the ‘alien’ [Gee, even the bible used the term ‘alien’] and the ‘stranger’ in the land.”  They also note churches do not violate any laws when they meet the basic needs of undocumented [illegal] immigrants.  They both call for ministry to immigrants “through prayer and action.”(64)

Apparently Mr. Knox is unaware that praying for illegal aliens is okay, but it’s the ‘action’ part that will get Baptists in legal trouble.  He also does not understand that ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens, in any way, IS illegal and punishable by up to five years in jail.  Not very good advice from Marv Knox, editor of the Baptist Standard.(64)

3.  The (New Life Presbyterian Church) or Cumunidade Presbiteriana Nova Vida as it is called in Framingham, where Pastor Manoel Oliveira claims:  “We’re here to fight a particular idea that is being impregnated [He means ‘gaining traction’] in Framingham, the idea of hatred [actually anger] against one particular group [illegal aliens].”(65)  That ‘particular group’ is the ‘visible minority’ of Brazilians.  Lost in the rhetoric is that the townspeople are ‘mad as hell’ that the Brazilians, who are nearly all illegal aliens, are degrading their ‘quality of life’ and ruining their town.

In the typical support given to illegal alien groups, the church has said:  “Today they’re against the Brazilians, tomorrow it will [be] against someone else . . .  This is not a group to defend Brazilians, but to defend the right of people to belong to the community [even it they are there illegally].  People have the right to express their opinions, but that doesn’t give them the right to threaten people or to say things that are not appropriate or untruthful.”(65)

You’ll notice no specific quotes about what those threats or untruths are, only innuendo.  It is surprising that they didn’t explicitly use the ‘N’ word . . . Nazis!  It’s just another example of attempts to silence the debate by calling the opposition racist, xenophobes, etc. and not allowing them the opportunity to rebut the accusations or accusers.

Of course, as usual, completely left out of the conversation is the fact the that the town of Framingham, MA has been inundated with Brazilian illegal aliens.  Anyone of minimal intellectual capacity, knows that the numbers of Brazilians in the town could not possibly have come there legally.  The Brazilians have completely overrun the town.  It was a physical impossibility for so many of them to arrive, in the time frame they did, and be there legally.  Everyone knows that, but no one from officialdom is doing anything about it.  In the meantime the quality of life for the residents of Framingham is rapidly disintegrating, and the anger about it roils.

So what do the town officials do?  They bend over backwards to invite “representatives from all ethnic groups [will that include the White ethnic group?] in the community to be part of a group of town officials, civic leaders, church pastors and representatives from the MetroWest Chamber of Commerce” to figure out how to pander to the illegal Brazilians.  Not how to respond to the demand by the legal citizens that the illegal aliens be denied taxpayer services, but to pander to the illegal alien Brazilians.(65)

Wake up Americans.  Being an American can no longer be a spectator sport.  Fight back!  Whine, snivel and complain in every way possible.  If you don’t know how to do that, just emulate the Hispanics, they’re very good at it.  Pay attention, and vote in the politicians who will insist that our immigration laws be enforced!!!

4.  “The meeting at Foundry United Methodist Church near Logan Circle [DC] marked an effort to address an issue that has roiled the region:  the crowds of day laborers, many of them here illegally, who flock to street corners seeking work. . . .  ‘Please help us,’ begged Claudio Delgado, 35, a Nicaraguan who seeks work each morning with a crowd of immigrants at 15th and P streets NW.  ‘We suffer every day.  Imagine how difficult it is to change bosses every day’ . . .  ‘We are afraid to call the police, because we are illegal,’ said Anacleto, a 34-year-old laborer, whose last name is being withheld because of deportation concerns.”(66)

To Claudio . . . go home and you won’t have those ‘problems.’  And, does the church know that the immigration law states that their building is ‘harboring’ illegal aliens and is subject to legal penalties for doing so?

Another sad story . . . it seems that due to recent ‘gentrification’ of the area, those poor illegal aliens are losing their staging area for soliciting day laborers.  Community organizations are working to get them “a permanent staging area for the District’s day laborers.  Several Washington suburbs have set up such sites, often supported by public funds, to provide clean, organized places for workers to seek jobs.”

Oh, isn’t that nice.  At taxpayer expense the ILLEGAL ALIENS will have a “clean organized place” for them to seek work.  A warning to the town . . . providing day labor centers is a criminal violation of immigration law and theft of taxpayer dollars.

Francisco Pacheco, a regional day-labor organizer, gave a presentation on how the workers could set up a center — from writing up a mission statement to creating short-term work contracts that employers would fill out.  Immigrant advocates offered to help the workers get started and raise funds.”(66)

You did notice that they are ‘immigrant advocates’ not ‘illegal immigrant advocates’ as they in fact are!  You should also know that there is a national network of day labor centers for illegal aliens.  They even have their own web site here:  http://ndlon.org/memberorgs.htm.

Abel Valenzuels, director of the UCLA center for the Study of Urban Poverty “speculated that about three-fourths of all day laborers are undocumented [illegal aliens].”(60)

Silvia Nava, supervisor for the CASA of Maryland Employee Rights Project said that her “center is part of a network of 125 facilities that helps day laborers find work across the country . . .  They [illegal aliens] are people who have a right to find a job.  They come here because the economy in their countries aren’t working.”  CASA “makes it a point not to ask whether the worker is legal.  ‘That’s the responsibility of the employer to ask.’”(60)

Isn’t it outrageous that these people who are illegally aiding and abetting aliens can say that they have a RIGHT to find a job.  THEY HAVE NO SUCH RIGHT!  They are here illegally.  They are guilty of criminal felonies.  So is Nava, the center director.  And, again we see that it is somebody else’s responsibility to ask about their legal status.  Just like you constantly hear that it is “the federal government’s responsibility to enforce immigration laws.”  We are a country of laws but nobody enforces or obeys those laws.  With those values and attitudes we are slip-sliding towards anarchy.

“Advocates say the centers can resolve residents’ complaints about the proliferating outdoor sites, where day laborers sometimes urinate in public, leave trash or pester passing women.  The centers have been controversial, however, with residents of some suburbs strongly opposed to using tax dollars to help people who might be in the country illegally.”  Wouldn’t the better solution be that they are rounded up and returned to their country of origin since they are here illegally?  Wouldn’t that solve the problem immediately and save the taxpayers money to boot?(66)

What the advocates have failed to understand is that ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens in their pursuit of work here in America is a criminal violation of our immigration laws that will garner them up to five years in prison for EACH offense.  Not to mention the theft of taxpayer dollars that will be spent harboring them in a building and enabling them to find work, an egregious affront to every hard-working American.

5.  At the Christ Fellowship of Atlanta church, “The Rev. Julian Herrera, of Norcross [GA] says Jesus would not harshly judge immigrant [illegal aliens] that cross the U.S.-Mexican border looking for work.  The way people can glorify God is to lend these people a hand instead of persecuting them.”(67)

“Herrera, a native of Mexico, became a Christian in Atlanta 15 years ago.  He later returned to Mexico and studied at an Assembly of God seminary.  He became a pastor and returned to the United States in 1999 at the invitation of a church in Marietta.”(67)  The Rev. Charles Strong rents space at Christ Fellowship of Atlanta to Herrera for his Spanish-speaking congregation.  Does the reverend know he is breaking immigration laws by providing a building that harbors illegal aliens?

“Earlier this year [2005] Herrera went to Washington with other Hispanic pastors organized by a group called CONLAMIC — the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders — to lobby for immigration reform and driver’s licenses for those without immigration documents [illegal aliens].”(67)  What ever happened to the separation of church and state?  Aren’t you outraged that Hispanic and Latino clergy are advocating for illegal aliens.  Fight back!

Manuel Mendo, [a] Baptist pastor from El Salvador, [at the same forum] said the laws of God are greater than the laws of man.  Mercy is one of the most important acts a Christian can show.”(67)

David Jenkins, who teaches at the Chandler School of Theology at Emory University, [who] has worked with refugees and says helping the stranger is central to Jesus’ message . . .  Jesus was constantly breaking a lot of the cultural norms of his tradition.”(67)  Ah, but does that include committing the criminal act of ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens and disobeying our immigration laws?  Does David Jenkins believe it is okay to break the law?  Is that what he teaches at Emory University?

Gregory Howard, chairman of the Gwinnett County Republican Party, listened to Herrera [and said] . . . ‘What he’s saying is we’re not children of God and we’re not Christians if we don’t allow this [massive invasion of illegal aliens], I’m deeply offended by this.’”(67)  It seems that at least one person in the audience got it right!

6.  The Rev. Julio Barquero, of the Centro Cristiano Fellowship in Sherwood, AK has said:  “Little Rock is the border between Mexico and the U.S., . . . [n]ot Texas anymore — Arkansas.  Texas has been conquered by Hispanics.”(68)  Has their arrogance ‘got your goat’ yet?  Are you mad enough to fight back?  Are you going to sit back and let the Hispanics take over America?

“Barquero explained that Latinos in Texas have networks and institutions to help them navigate in society, whereas the Latino population in Arkansas is struggling because it is so new.”(68)  What he means is that Arkansas has been newly occupied by the illegal alien hordes invading our country and now they want to ‘reconquista’ more than the mythical territory of Aztlan.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, “Forty to forty-nine percent of all immigrants in Arkansas are undocumented [illegal aliens].”(68)  Take Note:  That means that figuratively, every other person of the ‘visible minority’ you see in the towns of Arkansas is an illegal alien!  Wake up America, look around your communities.  Pay attention to what is happening today in America.  We are being overrun by a ‘migrant army’ of Hispanics who WILL, by their sheer numbers, divide America into two cultures, languages and societies.

The Rev. Barquero also “started a program that issues identification cards to undocumented [illegal alien] Latinos in conjunction with the Sherwood Police Department.  With the IDs issued at the church, miracles have happened.  He says the cards enable Latinos to purchase cars, obtain insurance, and even eventually quality for state drivers licenses.  Church officials will issue a card to anyone who can produce a birth certificate or other form of identification from his or her native country, and Barquero says they have distributed 4,500 IDs, all of which bear the seal of the Sherwood Police Department.”(68)

Well now, there’s a perfect case that requires local American citizens to step forward and demand that the local police stop breaking the law by ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens.  Demand that they end such a travesty of illegal behavior.  Tell them to stop sanctioning illegal behavior and facilitating criminals!  If necessary, band together and hire a law firm to sue them.  Several firms come to mind:  Judicial Watch, FILE (Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement), the Washington (DC) Legal Foundation (WLF), and the Mountain States Legal Foundation.

Carlos Cervantes, the state director of LULAC said:  “The reason that they [Latinos] enjoy Arkansas is that they enjoy the small towns.  They just feel real comfortable here.”(68)  I just bet they do!  The Mexican ‘migrant army’ has already penetrated even deep into America.  Remember that Cervantes considers the border of Arkansas to be the border to Mexico because Texas has already been conquered!  Are you angry yet?  Get involved in your towns.  Fight back!

Even more troubling for Arkansans is that, according to Cervantes“Arkansas has the second-fastest-growing Hispanic population in the country, which puts it on the crest of the next wave of Latino migration [illegal alien occupation by the ‘migrant army’] that is following initial settlements in Texas, California, and other states.  As a result, the Mexican government has closed its consulate in New Orleans and is opening one in Little Rock.”(68)

Cesar Compadre, a professor at the UAMS colleges of pharmacy and public health founded La Casa, a non-profit organization that “serves as a bridge between Latinos and Arkansas institutions that want to interact with Latinos.  It helps Latinos with everything from simple orientation services, such as getting their electricity connected, to more complicated situations, such as how to obtain a kidney transplant.”(68)

The Catholic Diocese of Little Rock also provides services such a “free bilingual medical clinic and offers to help with the immigration process.  Sheila Gomez, who handles Latino outreach for the Catholic Diocese, says that most people are misinformed about the realities of life as an undocumented [illegal alien] immigrant.”(68)

The Mosaic Church of Little Rock, a self-described multi-ethnic, economically diverse church to which Elisabeth Ortega is a member says:  “They don’t have driver’s licenses because they are undocumented [illegal aliens].  Their kids can’t go to college because they don’t have social security numbers [untrue] and can’t get loans [also untrue].  Even with [free] medical care, it is amazing how far behind Little Rock is in providing translators.  I had to take a person to the doctor and translate for them.”(68)

Gee, isn’t that they way non-English speaking persons were helped before the government required taxpayer-financed multi-lingual help everywhere and everyplace in America?  Churches, family, friends, neighbors or children used to step in and do those things.  Now the ‘nanny state’ does it for them even when they are here illegally.

Ms. Ortega goes on to say that “the goal of Mosaic is to integrate the Latinos with the greater community by providing a place for them to feel comfortable and accepted.”(68)  That goal is the antithesis of what it should be, which is to obey the law and not ‘aid and abet’ illegal aliens who have invaded our country and are able stay here because they are facilitated and protected by churches like Mosaic.

What on earth is happening in Little Rock?  The Hispanics shills in Little Rock, along with their facilitators are busy pushing their wants and needs with no respect or allegiance to American laws, values, culture, language or society.  All they care about is their racist agenda of Hispanic and Latino political and economic dominance, which they intend to achieve by any means necessary!  Sadly, and most unfortunately, with the help of a ‘fifth column’ that includes many, many religious institutions and leaders as well as unsuspecting, naive, non-Hispanic American citizens.

These Religious Institutions and Their Members are Fostering Chaos and Anarchy:

Clearly the government of these United States, has abdicated all responsibility and efforts to stop Mexico’s ‘migrant army’ from invading our country.  Working in tandem with our ‘do-nothing’ government, religious institutions are working vigorously as a ‘fifth column’ to foster and promote a state of lawlessness.

Mexico’s ‘migrant army’ is an overwhelming Hispanic invasion that is defying our laws and sovereignty, balkanizing our country, degrading our schools, hospitals and jails, corrupting our culture, society and national language, as it metastasizes throughout the United States.

Doesn’t it strike you as outrageous that the one institution in our society that most Americans rely upon to provide moral stability and integrity, turns out to be the ‘prime mover’ towards anarchy?

What can be done to remedy the problem?  Speak out loudly and clearly about what you know to be corrupt calls for lawlessness by your churches, its hierarchy, ministry and especially among your fellow parishioners.  Only then can the brakes be applied to stop this spiral towards chaos and lawless disorder.

All the above religious entities exhibit a misguided naiveté that is frightening, inappropriate and beyond all rational reasoning or understanding.  For churches to proselytize ‘aiding and abetting’ illegal aliens is simply ‘beyond the pale’ as well as criminal behavior.  However, above all else, their lack of concern for law-abiding Americans, most of whom are also Christians, is unforgivable.  Their collective unconscionable actions are at best . . . grievous, repugnant and amoral!


Note 1:  All bracketed [ ] notations within quotes, are added for clarification.
Note 2:  All underlining and italics, within the quotes and elsewhere, are done for emphasis.
Note 3:  For an excellent source on The National Council of La Raza (The Race), LULAC, MALDEF, MEChA, and the ACLU, et al go to:  http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/viewGroups.asp?catId=6.


 

References

  1. Robert Justich and Betty Ng, CFA, The Underground Labor Force Is Rising To The Surface, steinreport.com, January 23, 2005, http://www.steinreport.com/BearStearnsStudy.pdf.
  2. Jim McTague, Going Underground:  The shadow economy is about to top $1 trillion – at a great cost to many, barron’sonline.com, January 3, 2005, http://www.nbpc1613.org/news/010105_BARRONS_Underground%20Economy.htm.
  3. Jeffrey S. Passel, Estimates of the Size and Characteristics of the Undocumented Population, The Pew Hispanic Center, March 21, 2005, http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/44.pdf.
  4. Fred Ebel, Illegal immigration invasion numbers, May 30, 2005, Desert Invasion – U.S., http://www.desertinvasion.us/data/invasion_numbers.html.
  5. Fred Ebel, How many illegal aliens are in the U.S.?, January 3, 2005, theamericanresistance, http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/illegal_alien_numbers.html.
  6. Lawrence E. Harrison, The silence about immigrants, September 29, 2004, The Boston Globe, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/09/29/the_silence_about_immigrants/.
  7. NewsMax.com, Feds Undercount Illegal Aliens, March 16, 2001, theamericanresistance.com, http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/3/15/202322.shtml.
  8. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Catholic Church & Charities Illegally ‘Aid and Abet’ Aliens, August 17, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/CatholicChurch.html.
  9. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Hospitals ‘Mugged’ by Illegal Aliens, July 12, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Mugged.html.
  10. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Hispanic Racism Rears its Ugly Head in US Congress, September 22, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Baca.html.
  11. American Patrol, The Scourge of MEChA, Accessed October 4, 2005, americanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/MEChAindex.html.
  12. Stanford University Editorial Board, MEChA:  Social Justice Group or KKK?, October 24, 2003, stanfordreview.org, http://www.stanfordreview.org/Archive/Volume_XXXI/Issue_2/Editorial/editorial1.shtml.
  13. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 1), April 22, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism1.html.
  14. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 2), May 2, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism2.html.
  15. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., Blatant Racism by the Pro-illegal Alien Crowd (Part 3), June 21, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/Racism3.html.
  16. Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), Arizona Law Denying Benefits To Illegal Aliens Upheld, August 9, 2005, MSLF, http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/press_releases.cfm?pressreleaseid=477.
  17. Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), Court Dismisses Challenge To Arizona Law Denying Welfare For Illegal Aliens (Friendly House v. Napolitano), August 11, 2005, WLF, http://www.wlf.org/upload/081105LURS.pdf.
  18. Letter from Senator John McCain, (4 Million divided by 365 equals 10,000+ per day), dtd. February 10, 2004, http://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/letter_mccain_2004feb10.html.
  19. Travis Loller, Mexican Consulate to offer ID cards during annual visit, The Island Packer, June 25, 2005, http://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/story/4973488p-4545103c.html.
  20. Megan Hawkins, Mexican officials to issue ID cards, passport in D.M., September 25, 2005, The Des Moines Register, http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050925/NEWS08/509250338/1001/RSS01.
  21. Gabriela Rico, Waiting for documentation:  Almost 2,000 people line up at a mobile Mexican Consulate in Salem [OR], March 6, 2005, The Statesman Journal, http://159.54.226.83/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050306/NEWS/503060325.
  22. Jennifer Delson and Anna Gorman, Mexico’s ID Makes Major Gains in U.S.:  Use of the matricula consular is helping many to assimilate, which is one reason those against illegal immigration oppose the card’s use, September 27, 2005, Los Angeles Times, http://www.americas.org/item_22206.
  23. Andorra Bruno and K. Larry Storrs, Consular Identification Cards:  Domestic and Foreign Policy Implications, the Mexican Case, and Related Legislation, March 31, 2005, Congressional Research Service, http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/news/2005,0406-crs.pdf.
  24. Eduardo Porter and Elisabeth Malkin, Way North of the Border, September 30, 2005, New York Times, http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~border/list_articles/REQ_Sept30_WayNorthoftheBorder.html.
  25. Carlos Loret de Mola, The Great Invasion:  Mexico Recovers Its Own, July 20, 1982, americanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/RECONQUISTA/GreatMexInvasDeMola820720.html.
  26. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, azteca.net, http://www.azteca.net/aztec/guadhida.html.
  27. Monterey County Historical Society, Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, mchsmuseum.com, http://www.mchsmuseum.com/treaty.html.
  28. Map of the Territory of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Accessed June 15, 2005, loc.gov, http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/ghtreaty/ghmap.jpg.
  29. KFOXTV.com, LULAC opposes NM Minutemen, June 11, 2005, kfoxtv.com, http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/4598324/detail.html?rss=elp&psp=news.
  30. John Kirsch, Hispanic voters gaining political clout, October 3, 2005, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX), http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/12804653.htm.
  31. Katherine Rosenberg, Home Depot picketed over illegal immigrant allegations, June 12, 2005, desertdispatch.com, http://www.desertdispatch.com/2005/111859538421537.html.
  32. National Council of La Raza, Funders, Accessed September 18, 2005, nclr.org, http://www.nclr.org/section/about/funding/.
  33. KVOA News, Some Hispanics decry group’s border patrols, June 12, 2005, KVOA.com, http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=3464545.
  34. Discover the Network, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), April 15, 2005, http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6189.
  35. Amy Waters Yarsinske, All for One and One for All:  A Celebration of 75 years of the League of United Latin American Citizen (LULAC), June 9, 2004, lulac.org, http://www.lulac.org/about/history.pdf, (See page 85 or .pdf page 87).
  36. League of United Latin American Citizens, LULAC Corporate Alliance, Accessed September 21, 2005, lulac.org, http://www.lulac.org/links.html#anchor551841.
  37. Discover The Network, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), April 15, 2005, http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6156.
  38. The American Patrol, Contributors to MALDEF – 2002-2003, theamericanpatrol.com, http://www.americanpatrol.com/MALDEF/Contributors-2002-2003.html.
  39. Jim Trageser, Charging ‘racism’ easier than facing issues, September 1, 2005, North County Times (CA), http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/09/01/news/columnists/trageser/19_52_248_31_05.txt.
  40. Joseph Fallon, Funding Hate:  foundations and the radical ‘Hispanic’ lobby, Fall 2000, The Social Contract, http://www.thesocialcontract.com/cgi-bin/showarticle.pl?articleID=910&terms.
  41. Hector Carreon, USA officials seek to declare “border vigilantism” a federal hate crime, August 15, 2005, La Voz de Aztlan (Please be advised that this is a reconquista anti-White, anti-American, Mexican racist, hate-filled website), http://www.aztlan.net/hate_at_the_border.htm.
  42. Fifth Column, Accessed October 3, 2005, infoplease.com, http://www.infoplease.com/dictionary/fifth+column.
  43. The Concise Law Encyclopedia, Aid and Abet, Accessed September 11, 2005, thelawencyclopedia.com, http://www.thelawencyclopedia.com/term/aid_and_abet.
  44. Brad A. Greenberg, Christians chide governor, May 9, 2005, The San Bernadio (CA) Sun, http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0%2C1413%2C208~12588~2860855%2C00.html.
  45. Sharon McNary, Churches target governor — Immigration:  A state group wants him to end his support of the Minutemen Project, May 11, 2005, The Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA), http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_D_churches12.f29a.html.
  46. Brainy Dictionary, definition of anarchy, Accessed September 13, 2005, Brainy Dictionary, http://www.brainydictionary.com/words/an/anarchy130036.html.
  47. United States Code, Title 8 – Aliens and Nationality, Chapter 12 – Immigration and Nationality, Subchapter II – Immigration, Part VIII – General Penalty Provisions, Section 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens, As of January 6, 2003, findlaw.com, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/8/chapters/12/subchapters/ii/parts/viii/sections/section_1324.html.
  48. The Concise Law Encyclopedia, felony, Accessed September 11, 2005, thelawencyclopedia.com, http://www.thelawencyclopedia.com/term/felony.
  49. Stephen Dinan, Bishops back aid to immigrants, May 11, 2005, The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050510-113801-4424r.htm.
  50. KFOXTV, Catholics Back Illegal Immigrants?, 2005, kfoxtv.com, KFOXTV, Catholics Back Illegal Immigrants?, 2005, kfoxtv.com, http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/4693373/detail.html?rss=elp&psp=news.
  51. Sara Ines Calderon, Church organizing anti-Minuteman campaign:  Majority of City Commission would support resolution against border militia group, September 5, 2005, The Brownsville (TX) Herald, http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/ts_more.php?id=66899_0_10_0_M.
  52. Michael Easterbrook, Latinos rally for change:  As population soars, Hispanics call for better quality of life, August 15, 2005, The News and Observer, http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/2723184p-9160955c.html.
  53. Matthew Barakat, Hispanics flock to Virginia diocese, August 13, 2005, The Washington Times, http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050812-101702-9976r.htm.
  54. John Darling, Mexican residents gain ID benefits:  Consular recognition aids citizenship effort, May 1, 2005, Mail Tribune, http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2005/0501/local/stories/16local.htm.
  55. Michael Fisher, Disaster aid urged for illegal migrants –PLEA:  The leader of the Inland Catholic diocese decries limits on help for noncitizens [illegal aliens] in need, September 22, 2005, The Press Enterprise (Riverside, CA), http://www.pe.com/breakingnews/local/stories/PE_News_Local_D_barnes23.1d9a1c58.html.
  56. Cardinal urges governor to sign SB 60, September 30, 2005, The Tiding (CA), http://www.the-tidings.com/2005/0930/drivers.htm.
  57. Heather Rutz, Nun takes issue with Beck’s illegal immigration plans, October 5, 2005, The Lime News (OH), http://www.limaohio.com/story.php?IDnum=18320.
  58. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., NJ AG gets Illegal Alien Law Enforcement RIGHT!, September, 28, 2005, StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com, http://www.StopTheNorthAmericanUnion.com/NJ-AG.html.
  59. Edward Hegstrom, Minutemen critics urge immigration reform:  Religious and political leaders say changes would end the appeal of border watchers, July 13, 2005, The Houston Chronicle, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1441724/posts.
  60. Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Day Labor Centers Stir Controversy Throughout Country, August 30, 2005, FOX News, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167641,00.html.
  61. Stephen Dinan, Church eyes immigration reform, August 10, 2005, The Washington Times, http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050809-105557-9543r.htm.
  62. The Orlando Sentinel, Lutherans support immigrants, August 16, 2005, orlandosentienl.com, http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-cfbriefs16_605aug16,0,7337964.story.
  63. Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), Immigration, Accessed October 6, 2005, elca.org, http://www.elca.org/socialstatements/immigration/.
  64. Marv Knox, We can’t wait for immigration reform, January 21, 2005, Baptist Standard, http://www.baptiststandard.com/postnuke/index.php?module=htmlpages&func=display&pid=2877&print=1.
  65. Liz Mineo, Group forming in support of immigration, May 5, 2005, The MetroWest Daily News, http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=97758.
  66. Mary Beth Sheridan, Workers, Neighbors begin Dialogue:  Community Weighs Day-Labor Center, September 22, 2005, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/21/AR2005092100893.html.
  67. Mary Lou Pickel, Illegal immigration polarizes Christians, August 10, 2005, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, http://www.ajc.com/search/content/auto/epaper/editions/wednesday/atlanta_world_249f3477845e900f00ff.html.
  68. Warwick Sabin, Border state:  The support network struggles to catch up with Arkansas’s status as a prime destination for Latino immigrants, June 23, 2005, Arkansas Times, http://www.arktimes.com/Articles/ArticleViewer.aspx?ArticleID=9d1b5464-9e3e-45a1-9b9d-6317983ac984

Copyright © Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D., 2009, All Rights Reserved

http://www.alipac.us/f12/our-government-aiding-abetting-illegal-aliens-104323/

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/category/obama-the-enemy-of-america/

Government Proves Hillary’s Crimes but Not One Mainstream Media Outlet Reports It!


By / 10 November 2015

The biggest political scandal discovered on Friday was not the now discredited Politico Ben Carson/West Point story it was a startling scoop in the Washington Free Beacon by Lachlan Markay that Hillary Clinton did sign a non-disclosure agreement which outline that she could be criminally libel for negligent handling of classified information (see below). People have assumed that she signed such a document but Markay found and produced the signed document which was obviously ignored. Since the Free Beacon scoop, not one newspaper or wire service picked up the story–not one.

The basics of the Free Beacon scoop include:

As the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.

 A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.

Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA.

“I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation,” the agreement states.

 On Sunday morning, I ran the following Lexis/Nexis searches to see if Markay’s big story receive any media coverage, to make sure nothing was missed the search was run from the day before the Free Beacon story through Sunday morning.

  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hillary Clinton Signed
  • Hillary Clinton Non-Disclosure

The above three terms were searched for the following media they represent a few hundred pages, however if anybody wishes to see the articles searched send me an email and I will email them to you:

  • All newspapers and newswires
  • CNN
  • ABC, CBS, NBC news

Not one of the above revealed coverage of the huge Free Beacon story.  Lexis/Nexis does sometimes miss things, but even if one or two items were missed– if the story received the widespread coverage it deserved more than a few examples would show up.

Two days after the discredited Carson story, his claim of a West Point scholarship offer is still major news in the mainstream media.  Two days after the huge Washington Free Beacon story there is still media silence. In the end this proves Dr. Carson’s point that the media treats Republican candidates differently than it treats Hillary Clinton.

Hrc Sci Nda1

hill in orange funny face prison

<p style=” margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;”> <a title=”View Hrc Sci Nda1 on Scribd” href=”http://www.scribd.com/doc/288942974&#8243; style=”text-decoration: underline;” >Hrc Sci Nda1</a></p>https://www.scribd.com/embeds/288942974/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

http://eaglerising.com/26097/government-proves-hillarys-crimes-but-not-one-mainstream-media-outlet-reports-it/

66,000 Illegal Aliens With Criminal Histories Released Into The Streets Of America While Texas Patriot KC Massey Rots In Jail For Defending The Texas Border


ICE Document Details 36,000 Criminal Alien Releases in 2013

In 2013, ICE freed 36,007 convicted criminal aliens from detention who were awaiting the outcome of deportation proceedings, according to a document obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies.
By Jessica Vaughan May 2014

Download a PDF of this Backgrounder


Jessica M. Vaughan is the Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies.


Summary

In 2013, ICE freed 36,007 convicted criminal aliens from detention who were awaiting the outcome of deportation proceedings, according to a document obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies. This group included aliens convicted of hundreds of violent and serious crimes, including homicide, sexual assault, kidnapping, and aggravated assault. The list of crimes also includes more than 16,000 drunk or drugged driving convictions. The vast majority of these releases from ICE custody were discretionary, not required by law (in fact, in some instances, apparently contrary to law), nor the result of local sanctuary policies.

The document reveals that the 36,007 convicted criminal aliens freed from ICE custody in many instances had multiple convictions. Among them, the 36,007 had nearly 88,000 convictions, including:

  • 193 homicide convictions (including one willful killing of a public official with gun)
  • 426 sexual assault convictions
  • 303 kidnapping convictions
  • 1,075 aggravated assault convictions
  • 1,160 stolen vehicle convictions
  • 9,187 dangerous drug convictions
  • 16,070 drunk or drugged driving convictions
  • 303 flight escape convictions

Background

This enumeration of FY 2013 criminal aliens freed and the criminal convictions tied to these individuals was prepared by ICE in response to congressional inquiries following a report published by the Center for Immigration Studies. That report, “Catch and Release”, showed that ICE officers declined to bring immigration charges in 68,000 cases of criminal aliens they encountered in 2013.

It is important to recognize that the 36,007 criminal aliens counted in this document are a different set of cases from the 68,000 releases reported earlier. The 36,007 criminal aliens counted here are aliens who were being processed for deportation and were freed while awaiting the final disposition of their cases, or afterwards. The 68,000 releases were cases of alien criminals encountered by ICE officers, usually in jails, but who were let go in lieu of processing them for immigration removal charges in that year.

The 36,007 criminal aliens itemized in this document were released by means of bond; order of recognizance (unsupervised); order of supervision (which can consist of nothing more than a periodic telephone call to a designated ICE telephone number); an alternative to detention (such as an electronic ankle bracelet, or other form of tracking device); or parole (a form of legal status). The ICE document does not specify the number or type of criminal aliens released according to the form of release.

Separate information obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies reveals that the vast majority of these releases were discretionary, or even contrary to the requirements of various provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Only a small share of these criminal aliens (fewer than 3,000) were released in accordance with a 2001 Supreme Court decision, Zadvydas v. Davis, which prevents ICE from indefinitely detaining certain aliens whose countries will not accept them back. (See “Reining in Zadvydas v. Davis”.) Another small number may have been offered parole or legal status, either in exchange for their cooperation with ICE or another law enforcement agency in connection with a criminal prosecution, or because of another compelling public interest.

Analysis

This document raises questions about the Obama administration’s management of enforcement resources, as well as its enforcement plans and priorities. For instance, a series of directives to ICE agents and officers known as “prosecutorial discretion”, and the implementation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, have made certain broad categories of illegal aliens off-limits for enforcement. These policies have forced ICE officers in the field to avoid or cease deportation action in thousands of cases, even in cases of aliens charged with or convicted of crimes. ICE officers have testified in federal court that some arrested aliens have claimed to be eligible for DACA knowing that they likely will be released from custody and from immigration charges without verification of their claims. ICE should be asked to disclose how many and which of the 36,007 criminal alien releases occurred due to these recent policy changes.

In addition, over the last year certain advocacy groups have called for the Obama administration to scale back the number of deportations or halt them altogether. A number of criminal aliens in detention while awaiting completion of deportation proceedings have been the subject of petition campaigns, prayer vigils, demonstrations, and other forms of protest against enforcement. Typically these protests occur on behalf of a criminal alien who has family members in the United States. ICE should be asked to disclose how many of these releases came after such appeals were made on behalf of criminal aliens.

These figures call into question President Obama’s request to Congress for permission to reduce immigration detention capacity by 10 percent in favor of permission to make wider use of experimental alternatives to detention. These alternatives already are subject to serious questions about their efficacy and cost, and ICE’s methodology for evaluating the results needs to be carefully scrutinized. The reduced detention bed-space request, submitted as part of the executive branch’s budget plan, comes at a time in which ICE’s detention space needs are expanding due to rapidly increasing illegal arrivals along parts of the southwest border and continued high numbers of criminal aliens encountered by agents in the interior. The news that ICE released so many criminal aliens convicted of so many serious and violent crimes suggests that ICE could use more detention capacity, not less, in order to prevent further harm to the public from these individuals. ICE should be asked to track and disclose what additional crimes may have been committed by these individuals after their release.

ICE devotes very few resources to victim assistance and notification programs, and these meager efforts are focused primarily on helping victims of human trafficking rather than those who have been harmed by alien criminals. In fact, the only “ombudsman” type of position ICE has established — and maintained even in the face of specific congressional de-funding of the position — focuses on aiding illegal aliens, not their victims. ICE should establish a notification system, modeled on the most successful federal, state, or local victim-witness assistance programs, to alert the victims of alien criminals, local law enforcement agencies, and the public when violent or dangerous criminal aliens are released from its custody.

The criminal aliens released in 2013 had more than 300 convictions for “flight escape,” indicating that they had a prior history of fleeing from authorities. Experience (and common sense) suggests that such individuals would be poor candidates for release while awaiting possible deportation. Studies have shown that fewer than a quarter of deportable aliens who are released from custody while awaiting the outcome of immigration proceedings will show up for immigration court to finish their case. The departments of Homeland Security and Justice should be asked to disclose how many of these criminal aliens became fugitives after their release from ICE custody.

Conclusion

The revelation that 36,007 criminal aliens were released from ICE custody in 2013, an average of nearly 100 per day, is shocking, and could further shake public faith in the effectiveness of current immigration enforcement policies. This information is sure to raise concerns that, despite professions of a focus on removal of criminal aliens, Obama administration policies frequently have allowed political considerations to trump public safety factors and, as a result, aliens with serious criminal convictions have been allowed to return to the streets instead of being removed to their home countries.

DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson is on the verge of announcing the results of a review of deportation policies, ordered by the president in response to immigrant advocacy group protests. Most observers believe this review will result in policy changes to further expand the number and categories of illegal aliens who effectively are exempt from immigration enforcement and, if experience is a guide, will further increase the number of criminal aliens who are released instead of deported. Lawmakers and the public must insist that DHS fully disclose and be held accountable for the public safety impact of any additional deportation policy changes.

DHS released another 30,000 criminal aliens onto streets

– The Washington Times – Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Federal immigration officers released another 30,000 immigrants with criminal records last year, following the 36,000 it released in 2013, the government announced Wednesday — though it promised to take steps to cut down on the problem.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that handles detention and removal of illegal immigrants, said it will no longer allow overcrowding to be the main reason a dangerous illegal immigrant is released, and will require a top supervisor to approve the cases of any serious criminals that officers want to release.

Overall, ICE released 30,558 criminal aliens in fiscal year 2014, which is down from the 36,007 criminals released a year before.

The 2013 releases prompted an outcry, and the latest news that the releases continue is likely to renew the calls for ICE to get a handle on its actions.

New ICE Director Sarah R. Saldana said the number “still concerns me.”

“I am determined to continue to take every possible measure to ensure the public’s safety and the removal of dangerous criminals,” she said in announcing the new steps.

ICE said it had little discretion over most of the criminals it released. The agency said that under a previous court decision, immigrants whose home countries won’t take them back cannot be held indefinitely, so they have to be released after a period of time.

Republicans in Congress have proposed rewriting the law to allow for longer detention of serious criminals, and they have called on the Obama administration to use existing powers to deny visas to leaders of countries that refuse to take their citizens back.

But the administration has declined to take those steps.

Those released from custody are generally supposed to be monitored, and Ms. Saldana vowed to stiffen those procedures to try to ensure those that are released are not able to commit new crimes.

ICE didn’t release a breakdown of criminal offenses of the new 30,000 on Wednesday, but among the 36,000 released in 2013 were 193 homicide convictions, 426 sexual assault convictions, 303 kidnapping convictions and 16,070 convictions for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

ICE said that most of the homicide convictions were court-ordered.

Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which exposed the first batch of 36,000 releases, said Wednesday that giving supervisors more review of each case isn’t a solution, it’s the root of the problem.

“In fact, it’s the supervisors who are ordering the releases, and the intent of the supervision is to make sure that officers in the field are not detaining people — not the other way around,” she said. “The problem is most definitely the policies, not the officers. Creating more levels of review and red tape is not going to solve that problem.”

She said having more supervision of those released is a good step, but said it’s even more cost-effective to use expedited removal to kick criminals out of the country faster. She said ICE’s own analysis has found that using alternatives to detention, such as electronic monitoring or a phone-in system, turns out to be expensive because it results in drawn-out cases and more fugitives who abscond.

Ms. Vaughan said one reason for the drop from 36,000 to about 30,000 is because immigration agents are arresting and detaining fewer aliens in the first place, thanks to President Obama’s new immigration plans.

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson late last year acknowledged the high number of releases for a second year in a row.

“I believe it should be lower,” he said.

Mr. Johnson said money should never be a reason for releasing someone with a serious criminal record back onto the streets.

When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth.


The Bankers Manifesto of 1892
Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens.

fed goat and debt slaves

“We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.
At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination ( conspiracy) and legislation.

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished.”

AMERICA HOW TO DESTROY A NATION

Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.

THE BANKERS’ MANIFESTO OF 1934
Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an IMPERIALISM of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished.

The Complete List (Well, Almost) of Obama’s Scandals, Misdeeds, Crimes and Blunders…


John MacHaffie InvestmentWatchBlog

• $6 trillion in new national debt under Obama…after he promised to decrease the deficit.

• Obamacare — A massive and incredibly convoluted bill which exponentially increases the federal government’s control over our personal lives…which neither Obama nor a single Democrat even read before passing, and which will likely bankrupt the nation.

• In both the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, the Obama campaign purposely disabled the credit card verification system for its Web site donations, allowing anyone from any foreign country to donate with no limit and no proof of identity; in both elections it was demonstrated that people overseas and people with obviously false identities were able to donate to Obama campaign, in direct violation of several laws. To this day it is not known what percentage of Obama’s campaign funds are illegally obtained, since there is no documentation.

• Billions of taxpayer dollars gambled on “green” companies like Solyndra, NextEra, Ener1, Solar Trust and many others — all of which went bankrupt.

• An intentional refusal to enforce federal immigration laws.

• Unemployment at or above 8% for almost his entire term in office (which was actually closer to 15% actual unemployment).

• Operation Fast & Furious — a government-sponsored illegal gun-running scheme designed to purposely go awry so as to induce public outcry for gun control.

OLD FASHIONED TIP HOTLINE O AND HOLDER SELLING GUNS

• Spent 20 years listening to a racist anti-American pastor (Rev. Jeremiah Wright), whom Obama described as a mentor. On March 18, 2008, Obama gave a speech in which he said “I could no more disown Jeremiah Wright than I could disown my own grandmother” and “[Wright’s church, Trinity United] embodies the black community in its entirety.” Now Obama tries to pretend that Jeremiah Wright doesn’t exist, and that his extremist anti-white philosophy didn’t influence Obama’s worldview.

• Increased the percentage of Americans dependent on food stamps to unprecedented levels (now over 15% of the nation’s population).

• Militarily intervened in Libya in 2011 without the Congressional approval required by the War Powers Act — technically an impeachable offense.

• Before he entered politics, Obama worked as a lawyer suing banks in landmark cases, forcing them to give home loans to unqualified minority borrowers — a practice now understood as one of the primary initial causes of the eventual housing bubble and market collapse.

• Handed out over 1,200 waivers to politically connected donors exempting them from the onerous requirements of Obamacare.

• Greatly expanding the number of unaccountable “czars,” which essentially amounts to unilaterally adding new federal departments with no congressional oversight — leading to a true “bureaucracy” in the original sense (rule by unelected bureaucrats).

Sen. Mike Lee Uses One Simple Photo to Argue That We’ve Become a Nation of Regulations  “Behold my display of the 2013 Federal Register,” Lee wrote in the Facebook description. “It contains over 80,000 pages of new rules, regulations, and notices all written and passed by unelected bureaucrats.” But here’s the part where you really need to pay attention: “The small stack of papers on top of the display are the laws passed by elected members of Congress and signed into law by the president [emphasis added].”
Sen. Mike Lee Uses One Simple Photo to Argue That We’ve Become a Nation of Regulations
“Behold my display of the 2013 Federal Register,” Lee wrote in the Facebook description. “It contains over 80,000 pages of new rules, regulations, and notices all written and passed by unelected bureaucrats.”
But here’s the part where you really need to pay attention: “The small stack of papers on top of the display are the laws passed by elected members of Congress and signed into law by the president [emphasis added].”
• Using taxpayer dollars to bail out the private pension funds of autoworkers’ unions at GM & Chrysler.• Illegally ending the welfare-to-work requirements passed by Congress.

• Doling out $800 billion in stimulus cash for “shovel-ready” jobs that didn’t exist — the money just evaporated with no measurable economic benefit.

• Alienating and isolating Israel, our strongest ally in the Middle East.

• Apologizing to Islamists and terrorists for offending them.

• Under Obama’s watch, for the first time in history America’s credit rating was downgraded, due to his poor economic policies.

• Stopped American oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, allowing other nations with worse environmental records to drill instead — thereby managing to both weaken our economy and damage the environment simultaneously.

• Proposed in 2008 to intentionally bankrupt the coal industry — and now lies to voters and workers in coal-producing regions about his true intent.

coal o burning money green

• Pretends to be concerned about skyrocketing energy prices, when in fact he vowed to increase them on purpose (so as to make alternative energy schemes more competitive.)

• In a primary debate against Hillary Clinton in 2008, Obama said he would never force people to buy health insurance, since those without it couldn’t afford to buy it. Less than two years later, he rammed through Obamacare, which does indeed force people to buy health insurance.

• During the 2008 campaign, Obama repeatedly promised that if he was elected “No family making less than $250,000 will see any form of tax increase.” This promise was broken over and over again once he was elected.

• In 2008 Obama vowed if elected to increase security along the U.S.-Mexican border — and then in 2010 stopped construction of a “virtual fence” on the border and re-routed money earmarked for border security to other projects.

• Cash for Clunkers, which doled out taxpayer money to anyone who wanted to replace their old cars, but which mostly only ended up subsidizing the puchase of foreign-made cars by people who could have afforded them on their own anyway; meanwhile, the traded-in cars were all destroyed, creating a shortage and thereby increasing the cost of used cars, hurting the pocketbooks of poor people.

• Violated the U.S. Constitution by authorizing assassinations and drone strikes to kill American citizens abroad — without due process.

mooch my about drones killing 'our kids'

• Was caught on a “hot mike” promising the President of Russia that he would cave in to their demands for a weaker missile shield — after he was re-elected and no longer had to keep up the pretense that he sought to defend America.

• Appointed Van Jones, a former avowed communist who supported a “9/11 Truth” petition, to be “Green Jobs Czar.”

• Appointed Anita Dunn, who said Chairman Mao was her “favorite philosopher,” to be White House Communications Director.

• Appointed John Holdren, who perviously entertained the notion of forced mass sterilzation to stop overpopulation, to be Science Czar.

• Appointed Steven Chu, who openly advocated an artificial increase in gasoline prices to $10/gallon (and similar increases in other energy prices) to be Secretary of Energy.

• Appointed Kevin Jennings, who led a group that promoted X-rated “sex-positive” textbooks for 13-year-olds, instructed teenagers at a conference how to perform “fisting” (anal penetration by fists), who refused to report instances of statutory rape, and who expressed admiration for a member of NAMBLA, to be America’s “Safe School’s Czar.”

• When states voted to enforce the federal immigration laws which the federal government refused to enforced, Obama sued to stop them.

• Blocked continued construction of the Keystone Pipeline, thereby intentionally reducing energy resources for the US and forcing Canada to sell more of its oil to China.

• Repeatedly changed his position on gay marriage over the years, depending on what was politically expedient at the moment and which intended audience he was addressing.

• Before he was president, Obama staunchly opposed raising the national debt limit — but once elected, he insisted that it be raised.

• When giving a 2009 speech in France that he must have assumed Americans would never hear, he described the United States as “arrogant” and “dismissive” (while also criticizing Europe elsewhere in the speech).

• When states tried to stop election fraud with voter ID laws, Obama sued to prevent them from doing so.

• Instructed Attorney General Eric Holder to stonewall any investigation into the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panthers.

• Promised in 2008 that once elected he would officially recognize the Armenian Genocide; but to this date he has still failed to do so, caving in to threats and pressure from Turkey.

• Vowed to end the influence of lobbyists in Washington, but under Obama’s watch their influence has only increased.

• When he was first running for President, Obama promised, “I will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.” Needless to say, he has broken that promise with almost every bill he has signed since.

• Aided and abetted the “Arab Spring” which deposed existing secular governments across North Africa, leading to a regional power vacuum which was filled by Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other hardline Islamists.

• Refused to provide assistance or support the the earlier secular Iranian democracy uprising, allowing them to be crushed by the Islamic fundamentalist Iranian regime.

• In his first months in office, Obama bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia, the president of China, the Emperor of Japan, and President of Mexico, among others.

• Ordered NASA to make one of its top priorities not space exploration or scientific research but “Muslim outreach.”

• Used Obamacare as a pretext to greatly increase the size and power of the IRS (which was given 16,000 new agents and additional mandates to penalize taxpayers for noncompliance).

• Used the IRS to harass conservative businesses.

irs ss teabagger being interrogated

• In the GM bailout, he illegally shortchanged investors who according to bankruptcy laws were first in line to be recompensed; instead, he gave their share to the unions.

• Shut down oil drilling in the US, but then turned around and lent $2 billion to Brazil to support their government-controlled oil-drilling effort — and then promised the US would become one of Brazil’s biggest oil customers.

• Sued Boeing in an effort to control where businesses could locate, kowtow to the unions, and block the creation of 1,000 jobs in South Carolina, a right-to-work (i.e. no forced unionization) state.

• Adopted a longstanding Socialist political slogan, “Forward!”, as his 2012 campaign motto.

• Sent insulting form letters to the familes of dead SEALs.

• Neither disavowed nor distanced himself from anti-Romney campaign ads which threatened or implied violence against Republicans.

• Shortly after the recent eruption of anti-American violence in North Africa, Obama went to Las Vegas to do his debate preparation in a hotel…with a romanticized North Africa theme.

• Said in an interview that the Muslim call to prayer was “one of the prettiest sounds on earth at sunset.”

• Union boss and far-left activist Andy Stern has visitied Obama in the White House at least 53 times, at last count — greater access than any other private citizen.

• Hosted at the White House many Islamist members of groups associated with Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc.

EGYPT OUTLAED MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. WE SHOULD TOO

• Sponsored performances by and attended fundraisers with radical rappers like Michael Franti and Common, both of whose lyrics have in some cases been anti-police, anti-white, and anti-America.

• Hired Timothy Geithner, who is documented as cheating on his own personal taxes, to be Secretary of the Treasury.

• Told Joe “the Plumber” Wurzelbacher that it was good to “spread the wealth around.”

• Told small business owners nationwide in a 2012 speech that “you didn’t build that” — implying that they should not claim credit for their own success, since taxpayers (i.e. themselves and other business owners) had funded the national infrastructure.

• Insulted the British people by rudely returning to them a bust of Churchill which previously had been a ceremonial gift on display at the White House; when later confronted on this inexplicable action, he lied about it.

winston churchhill on islam

• Canceled plans to complete a missile defense shield in Poland, a move which was highly praised by Russia — the very nation whose missile threat would have been neutralized if the shield had been completed.

• By loudly publicizing (for personal political gain) the identity of exact SEAL teams who had killed Osama bin Laden, Obama made them a target for reprisals by Islamists; a short time later 22 SEALS were shot down and killed in Afghanistan, their worst loss of life ever.

• Established an extra-Constitutional top secret “kill list” of people (including Americans) Obama claims the right to kill on sight, and then bragged about it publicly.

Set up a special email account, “Flag@Whitehouse.gov,” to which Americans were supposed to inform the government of anyone they heard spreading “disinformation” about Obama’s health care overhaul. (This was the first of three different “spy on your friends and neighbors” programs.)

“Attack Watch” was Obama’s second Big Brother attempt, a Web site on which you would report “attacks” on Obama’s proposals and ideology; it was quickly shut down due to outrage and mockery.

Finally, Obama set up the “Truth Team” program which encouraged citizens to report to the government any friends or relatives they hear repeating “lies” about Obama. The Truth Team site still exists.

• Twisted the arms of defense contractors to not issue layoff notices in early November, so as to avoid causing bad news for Obama right before the election — even though federal law (the “WARN Act”) requires such notices.

• After the attacks on American interests in North Africa on September 11, 2012, Obama gave a speech to the U.N. and declared “The future must not belong to those who slander The Prophet of Islam” — transferring the blame from the attackers onto the makers of a film trailer that supposedly “offended” the Islamists.

gunny giving bho hell

• Repeatedly snubbed and got into public tiffs with Benjamin Netanyahu, who as the leader of Israel is supposed to be Obama’s closest colleague in international affairs.

• On May 19, 2011, Obama told Israel they must return to the 1967 borders as a pre-condition for continuing talks with the Palestinians — even though the status of the borders was the main issue the talks were supposed to address.

• Encouraged politically biased hiring practices in the Justice Department.

• Soon after taking office, Obama rescinded the “Mexico City Policy,” which previously had banned NGOs which are supported by American taxpayer funds from using those funds to perform abortions in foreign countries.

• Attempted to force returning veterans to pay huge increases for their health coverage…as a way to generate more funding for his Obamacare provisions.

• In June of 2011, he anointed his own underage daughters as “senior staff members” so that their vacation to Africa would be paid for with taxpayer money.

• Interviews with high school classmates revealed that Obama was a heavy and frequent user of marijuana in his teenage years (not to mention his self-admitted cocaine use in college).

o stoned MAN DATS SOME GOOD SHIT

• Played over 100 rounds of golf during his first three years in office, meaning that he was on the links close to 10% of the days he has been president.

KING PUTT

• Voted to allow post-birth abortions (i.e. facilitating the deaths of babies who survive late-term abortions) not just once but three times in a row as an Illinois state senator.

abortion libs h2o board and punctured skull of unborn

• The pastor whom Obama selected to give the national benediction at his 2009 inauguration recently declared that “all white people are going to Hell.”

• Sided with Hugo Chavez and the Castro regime regarding the Honduran Constitutional Crisis of 2009, the first time ever that the U.S. formed a political alliance with socialist governments in Latin America.

• Obama Administration OKed the nomination of Chas Freeman to chair the National Intelligence Council (which coordinates intelligence reports from all government agencies), despite the fact that he was openly hostile to Israel and strongly favored Arabist goals. (He later withdrew under pressure.)

• Chinese pianist Lang Lang played an offensively anti-American song at a 2011 White House dinner where Obama hosted Chinese president Hu Jintao, to the delight and amazement of the communist Chinese visitors, while Obama just sat there and smiled (the song’s Chinese lyrics describe Americans as “warmongering jackals”).

• There was a great deal of (still unverified) suspicion that the company LightSquared received favorable treatment from the Obama administration for approval of its broadband technology which interfered with the GPS system; an Air Force general claimed he was pressured by the Obama administration to downplay his criticism of LightSquared’s technology in sworn testimony.

• Obama’s Department of Energy awarded $529 million to Fisker Automotive to build their Karma hybrid electric cars — even though they are manufactured in Finland, cost over $100,000 each, and tend to explode.

• When Inspector General Gerald Walpin discovered during a 2009 investigation that one of Obama’s political allies (the mayor of Sacramento) was misusing government funds for personal gain, Obama unceremoniously fired Walpin — even though rooting out fraud was the job description of the Inspector General.

• More than once Obama made so-called “recess appointments” when the Senate was not actually in recess, which directly violates Constitutional rules about how appointments must be made; in each case it was his way of getting his political allies into certain key positions without them being vetted or approved by the Senate, as required.
O 1 HAS RESTRUCTURED TO ATTACK AMERICANS• After Nidal Malik Hasan massacred 13 people at Fort Hood while shouting “Allahu Akbar” so as to become a martyr for Islam, the Obama administration refused to classify his action as “terrorism” and instead deemed it merely “workplace violence.”

• Despite the fact that the Falkland Islands have been part of Great Britain since 1833 and that Great Britain is supposed to be our strongest ally, Obama essentially sided with Argentina in its new claim on the Falklands, not only by adopting the Argentine position that their status is open to negotiation, but even by (attempting to) refer to the islands by their Spanish name (Malvinas).

• Convened the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (a.k.a. the Simpson-Bowles commission) in order to address a major economic crisis…and then summarily dismissed and ignored their recommendations.

• Criticized the Supreme Court’s legal reasoning (about the Citizen’s United decision) during a State of the Union address, which many considered a dangerous precedent as it appeared to place political pressure on the court, violating the Constitution’s separation of powers; but his bullying seems to have later paid off, when the Supreme Court apparently altered its Obamacare decision so as to not ruffle any political feathers.

• On April 27, 2009, Obama’s staff (possibly at his direction) ordered Air Force One to make an unnecessary very low flight over part of Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty, which many residents mistakenly assumed must be a second 9/11 attack in progress; turned out that it was just a stunt to get a photo op of Obama’s plane next to the Statue of Liberty.

• Obama somehow managed to insert mentions of himself into the official biographies of earlier presidents on the White House Web site — even presidents from the 19th century. After public outcry, the narcissistic Obama mentions were quietly removed without comment.

• Intentionally misquotes the Declaration of Independence in speeches, often leaving out the words “by their Creator” in the famous passage “…are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,” which Obama instead has recited as “…are endowed with certain unalienable rights.”

• In June of 2009, Obama’s Solicitor General (and now Supreme Court Justice) Elena Kagan filed a legal brief to prevent the families of 9/11 victims from appealing their lawsuits against the Saudi royal family for financing the 9/11 attacks.

• The 2009 National Christmas Tree in the White House was decorated with ornaments depicting Chairman Mao, a drag queen, and a picture of Mount Rushmore that included Obama’s own head next to George Washington’s.

• Compelled Catholic and other religious organizations to provide health plans with free contraception, even though such requirements violate their rights of religious freedom and conscience.

• It was revealed only after Obama became president that during the 1990s he was a leading member of the “New Party,” a socialist-aligned far-left radical group in Chicago.

• Lied about his close associations with former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers; pretended the two barely knew each other, when multiple sources document they were friends and close colleagues for years.

• When Obama was inaugurated as President on January 20, 2009, he at first flubbed the oath of office, so he had to re-take it behind closed doors for his inauguration to be valid. He did so, but during this second, true inauguration in private, he purposely failed to place his hand on a Bible, as is traditional — the first president ever to not swear the oath of office on the Bible.

• Obama’s own author bio in his literary agent’s catalog and on their Web site stated for 17 consecutive years that he was born in Kenya; this claim remained intact despite other portions of the bio being altered and updated repeatedly. It was only in 2007 after he decided to run for the presidency that the “born in Kenya” claim was taken down. The original info must necessarily have come from Obama himself; some theorize he likely falsely claimed foreign birth in order to gain admission or scholarships in college, and never bothered to fix his lie.

AFRICAN LION LYIN AFRICAN

• After winning the 2008 election but before being sworn in, Obama bombastically concocted the official-seeming “Office of the President-Elect” as if it was some kind of real government department; in fact, it was just a self-congratulatory title he made up to look important before he actually became president.

• Obama administration came up with the bizarre euphemism “man-caused disasters” to describe acts of terrorism — because he wants to downplay terrorism as a significant political issue.

• For three years in a row his official budget proposals to Congress received exactly zero votes — not even a single vote from Democrats.

• Relied on an Islamic fundamentalist militia group called “The Martyrs of the February the 17th Revolution Brigade” to provide security at the American mission in Benghazi — and they not only failed to prevent the attack but perhaps even joined in on it.

13x ambassador stevens asked for help

• During the debate over Obamacare in 2009, Obama bluntly stated that doctors like to perform amputations rather than practice preventive medicine for no other reason than that they make a greater profit from amputations. The American College of Surgeons demanded an apology, which never arrived.

• Since 2008 the Los Angeles Times has been in possession of a videotape showing Obama honoring and praising anti-Western anti-Israel academic Edward Said, but they have steadfastly refused to release it to this day, for no discernible reason other than their belief it would damage Obama’s reputation.

• When the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe recently held a conference on human rights, Obama sent an American representative — Salam al-Marayati, a Truther who blamed Israel for the 9/11 attacks and who also praises Hezbollah and Hamas. To the nations of Europe, al-Marayati spoke for all Americans on the topic of human rights.

• Obama’s Department of Homeland Security specifically warned that Americans who are “dedicated to a
single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration” are potential terrorists, as are libertarian-minded voters who “favor of state or local authority” over centralized power. These “rightwing extremists” (who hold political beliefs shared by a majority of Americans) are deemed a greater threat to the nation than actual revolutionaries or jihadists.

• While campaigning in 2008 Obama declared that it was “unpatriotic” that Bush had increased the national debt at a rate of half a trillion dollars per year; but under Obama the rate of national debt increase has accelerated to almost three times the Bush rate ($6 trillion in new debt in under four years) — yet Obama has never apologized nor declared himself unpatriotic.

• For decades, every president has attended a “daily intelligence briefing” which updates him on critical world events each morning. Obama has skipped 60% of his daily intelligence briefings, including the ones leading up to the attack in Benghazi.

For more deep research go to Investmentwatchblog.com.

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/a-long-long-list-of-obamas-crimes-and-scandals

25 Violations of Law By President Obama and His Administration According To Federal Law, Many Of Our Politicians Should Be In Prison For Aiding And Abetting Illegal Immigration


25 Violations of Law By President Obama and His Administration

this person wants to know how many times does obama get to break the law until

  1. Obama Administration uses IRS to target conservative, Christian and pro-Israel organizations, donors, and citizens.
  2. In an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment, the Obama Justice Department ordered criminal investigations of FOX News reporters for doing their jobs during the 2012 election year.
  3. President Obama, throughout his Presidency, has refused to enforce long-established U.S. immigration laws. For example . . .
    • More than 300,000 captured illegal aliens had been processed and were awaiting deportation. But, incredibly, Obama stopped these deportations and ordered the U.S. border patrol to release many of these illegal aliens in violation of law and without explanation.
    • Congress rejected Obama’s so called DREAM ACT – which would have granted permanent residency to many illegal aliens. So Obama enacted his own version of the DREAM ACT by Executive Order, thus directly defying Congress. According to Obama’s Executive Order, illegal aliens can stay in America if they are under the age of 30, have been in America for at least five years, are enrolled in school or have graduated from high school, and have committed no felonies.
  4. Obama has refused to build a double-barrier security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border in direct violation of the 2006 Secure Fence Act. This law requires that “at least two layers of reinforced fencing” be built along America’s 650-mile border with Mexico. So far, just 40 miles of this fence have been built – most of it during the Bush Administration.
  5. Obama’s unconstitutional assault on your Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms.President Obama issued, in one day, 21 separate Executive Orders that attack and undermine your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.Especially egregious is President Obama’s Executive Orders amending the ObamaCare law to allow doctors and hospitals to investigate which patients own a gun. This outrageous Executive Order could allow the federal government to track and monitor law-abiding gun owners simply because they sought medical care.
  6. Obama’s assault on Christians and religious freedom.Obama’s Health and Human Services Department has, on its own (without Congressional approval), issued a mandate that all health insurance plans must include coverage for abortion-inducing drugs. As a result, pro-life employers and taxpayers are now effectively required by law to pay for abortions.This mandate is an unconstitutional attack on the protections for freedom of religion and freedom of conscience in the First Amendment and the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act. This mandate also directly violates the ObamaCare law enacted by Congress, which prohibits any and all taxpayer funds from being used to pay for abortions.
  7. Obama forced ObamaCare on an unwilling public through bribery and lying about its cost.Obama managed to secure passage of ObamaCare by one vote in the Senate by bribing senators. He bribed Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska with the notorious “Cornhusker Kickback.” He bribed Senator Mary Landrieu with the infamous $300 million “Louisiana Purchase.”In addition, Obama knowingly and blatantly lied to America and to Congress about how much ObamaCare would really cost. The cost of ObamaCare to the American people over the next 10 years will not be less than $1 TRILLION, as Obama promised in his nationally televised speech to the nation. Instead, the real cost of ObamaCare to the Federal Treasury is $2.4 TRILLION, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

    But the true cost of ObamaCare is more like $10 TRILLION when you factor in the cost to the states, the cost to individual Americans who are now required to purchase Obama-approved health plans (the “Individual Mandate”), the cost of exploding health insurance premiums, the $716 billion ObamaCare steals from Medicare, and the increased cost to businesses of complying with ObamaCare mandates.

  8. Operation Fast & Furious.”Operation Fast & Furious” was the Obama Administration’s gun-running scheme that put thousands of American-made semi-automatic weapons in the hands of Mexican drug cartels and resulted in the death of at least one U.S. Border Patrol Agent, Brian Terry. Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress and the public, claiming he didn’t know about his Justice Department’s Fast & Furious operation.Congress has now held Holder in contempt for defying congressional subpoenas and refusing to turn over thousands of Justice Department documents on Fast & Furious. President Obama asserted Executive Privilege to try to protect Holder. But for Executive Privilege to apply, Obama would have had to have known about Fast & Furious, making the President as culpable as Holder.

    Investigators suspect that Fast & Furious was an effort by the Obama Administration to discredit lawful gun ownership in America by purposefully creating gun crimes, thus inducing public outcry for gun control. When it put thousands of semi-automatic weapons in the hands of Mexican drug cartels, the Obama Justice Department knew these guns would be used to commit crimes, perhaps even kill some Americans. Then Obama could say: “See how dangerous these guns are. We must ban them.”

  9. “Federal Communications Commission (FCC): Regulated the Internet despite a court order from the Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington, D.C. stating that the FCC does not have the power to regulate the Internet.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  10. “Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Imposed Cross-State Air Pollution Rules on the state of Texas at the last minute and without an opportunity for Texas to respond to the proposed regulation. EPA overreach was based on a dubious claim that air pollution from Texas affected a single air-quality monitor in Granite City, Illinois more than 500 miles and three states away from Texas.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  11. “Department of Justice (DOJ): Rejected state voter ID statutes that are similar to those already approved by the Supreme Court of the United States. DOJ ignored section 8 of the Voting Rights Act which calls for protections against voter fraud, and used section 5 to administratively block measures to protect the integrity of elections passed by state legislatures.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  12. “DOJ: In violation of 10th Amendment, sued to prevent Arizona from using reasonable measures to discourage illegal immigration within its borders. Arizona has a large number of illegal immigrants, compared to other states, and needs to be able to act to reduce the number.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  13. “DOJ: Went to court to stop enforcement of Alabama’s immigration reform laws, which require collection of the immigration status of public school students, require businesses to use E-Verify, and prohibit illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  14. “White House: Made “recess appointments” to the National Labor Relations Board and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau when Congress was NOT in recess. The Obama Administration has ignored the ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that the appointments are unconstitutional.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  15. “Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC): Interfered with a Michigan church’s selection of its own ministers by trying to force the church to reinstate a minister who was discharged for her disagreement with the religious doctrine of the church.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  16. “Department of Energy (DOE): In 2009, the Obama Administration arbitrarily broke federal law, violated various contracts, and derailed the most studied energy project in American history at Yucca Mountain by denying it a license, thus costing the American people more than $31 billion.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  17. Department of the Interior (DOI): Forced Glendale, a family-oriented town in Arizona, to become another Las Vegas against its will by granting “reservation status” to a 54-acre plot in the town, where the Tohono O’odham Indian Nation plans to build a resort and casino.” (SOURCE: Report from Nine State Attorneys General)
  18. Without Congressional approval, Obama gutted the work requirement for welfare recipients passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
  19. In the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler, Obama illegally shortchanged bond holders in favor of Labor Unions, despite U.S. bankruptcy laws that specify that bond holders be first in line to be paid back.
  20. Eager to use the killing of Osama bin Laden for political gain, Obama exposed the identity and method of operation of the Navy SEALs team that conducted the operation in Pakistan, thus exposing its members to a lifetime of risk because they have been targeted for assassination by Islamists. A short time after Obama exposed the Navy SEALs’ method of operation, 22 SEALs were shot down and killed in Afghanistan. It is a violation of law for the President or any American to reveal classified military secrets.
  21. President Obama established an extra-constitutional top secret “kill list” of people (including Americans) who can be summarily killed on sight – presumably by drones — without due process. Once on Obama’s kill list, an American citizen can be targeted and executed on the opinion of a single government bureaucrat. That’s not how our legal system is supposed to work.
  22. Obama Administration officials twisted the arms of defense contractors to not issue layoff notices in October of 2012 so as to avoid causing bad news for Obama right before the election — even though federal law (the “WARN Act”) requires such notices. ; Not only is this a violation of the WARN Act, it’s also an unlawful use of federal officials for campaign purposes.
  23. President Obama intervened militarily in Libya in 2011 without the Congressional approval required by the War Powers Act.
  24. Obama knowingly lied to Congress and the American people about the killing of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya. The President and his representatives repeatedly said an anti-Islamic video sparked a spontaneous uprising in Libya that resulted in the killings even though Obama knew that the attack was a well-planned military-style assault by al Qaeda on the anniversary of September 11.
  25. Michelle Obama’s family trip to Africa in June of 2011, including a private safari at a South African game reserve, cost American taxpayers $424,000 for air travel alone. Mrs. Obama brought along both her makeup artist and hairstylist, as well as her mother, a niece and nephew, and her daughters, who were listed as “senior staff members.”

https://www.committeeforjustice.org/content/25-violations-law-president-obama-and-his-administration

 




According To Federal Law, Many Of Our Politicians Should Be In Prison For Aiding And Abetting Illegal Immigration

CRIMINAL RAP SHEET

https://kellidgordonlibertyblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/according-to-federal-law-many-of-our-politicians-should-be-in-prison-for-aiding-and-abetting-illegal-immigration-july-4-2014/


Constitutional Violations

Unconstitutional acts have been perpetrated on the American people by our representatives’ actions and inactions. Constitutional Defenders of Texas has outlined 35 recent violations.  Listed below are our current top five grievances:

  1. NDAA (National Defense and Authorization Act):  Authorizing the capture and indefinite detention of a person who engages in “hostilities against the US”, without due process. Explanation of NDAA violations

  2. Patriot Act:  Gives law enforcement and intelligence agencies the power of sweeping search and surveillance authority.  Explanation of Patriot Act violations

  3. FAA Bill (Federal Aviation Administration Act):  Authorizes a comprehensive plan for drone use in our national airspace with the technology to spy on citizens and their property. Explanation of the FAA Bill violations

  4. Eligibility for the President of the United States: Congress failed in their requirement to vet presidential candidates prior to the election.  Explanation of the Eligibility violations

  5. ObamaCare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act): Congress failed to challenge requirements of a tax and the Supreme Court decision on the individual mandate.  Explanation of the ObamaCare violations

View our entire list

Actions by Your Senators and Congressmen

Our elected officials swore to Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States, yet their voting records indicate otherwise*. Listed below are the recorded votes by North Texas elected Senators and Representatives:

http://constitutionaldefendersoftexas.org/ContactUs.html

http://constitutionaldefendersoftexas.org/

http://constitutionaldefendersoftexas.org/ConstitutionalViolations.html

domestic terroists the whole administration photo

Operation PATCON & The Strategy of Tensions (FBI Anti-Patriot False Flag Terrorism) Eric Holder Manipulating The American Mind


waco just doing their jobs

 

==============================================================

PATCON (FBI Anti-Patriot False Flag Terrorism) Research Pack, v1

(Download ZIP package by clicking below.)

https://ia700508.us.archive.org/33/items/PatconfbiAnti-patriotFalseFlagTerrorismResearchPackV1/PatconfbiAnti-patriotFalseFlagTerrorismResearchPackV1.zip

https://ia700508.us.archive.org/33/items/PatconfbiAnti-patriotFalseFlagTerrorismResearchPackV1/PatconfbiAnti-patriotFalseFlagTerrorismResearchPackV1_meta.xml

In order to discredit and implicate “right-wing terror groups”, the FBI evidently instituted a “sting” program to help create such groups, supply them with weapons and explosives, and then move them on to violent acts. The purpose? Ultimately to enact otherwise impossible anti-constitutional legislation, to futher erode protections of privacy, and to further limit the right of US citizens to posess firearms.

A long legacy of violent acts seems thereby to have been artficially created: the Stockton Schoolyard Massacre, the 1993 Twin Towers bombing (proven to be FBI created), and the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing. In 1999, FBI “Project Meggido” officially declared certain conservative Christian groups as ‘terrorists’.

oklahoma_city_bombing

All this appeared to the public to give some credence to Bill Clinton’s strange announcement of a “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy” – a ‘conspiracy’ he evidently had a hand in creating himself.

bill clinton

PATCON seems to have morphed for some time (ca 2000) to include factes necessary for perpetrating the 9/11 attacks, under the administration of George Bush. This included, for examle, shadowing Mossad agents, who were in turn shadowing the ‘hijackers’ who had CIA-supplied passports, but doing nothing to stop them. You will note in certain of the documents contained in this pack references to “middle-eastern” men etc. … and remembering “Middle East Terrorists” working together with the FBI for the WTC-93 bombing… the framework for 9/11 already being laid.

WTC 1993 trade-center-bombing-explosion

In the same year as the original World Trade Center bombing, the FBI circulated a peculiar memo (in this package) suddenly calling for PATCON to stop – sort of. The memo seems to leave some ambiguity as to whether the program is ending, or if agents were just to stop talking about it. Remember “class-1″ FBI operations involve illegal activities (carried out by FBI agents) to begin with, and the revelations of FBI involvement in that WTC attack might have made things a little too hot to go on without ‘deniability’.

Under the Obama administration, however, PATCON (though “officialy” ended as a class-1 illegal operation in 1993), seems to have been restored to its original purposes, and once more under the watchful eye of Eric Holder (assistant in the original PATCON). This time, it takes the form of engendering bloodshed and violence using the “Fast and Furious” gun-running scheme. This FBI-sponsored gun running to Mexican drug cartels was ment to frame lawful US gun owners and firearms dealers as the cause of the violence. Again, the purpose was to get anti-Constitutional legislation passed.

BRIAN TERRY RIP

 

“Operation Gladio” – The Violent Cold War Black Op Continues Today – 2013

https://archive.org/details/operationGladio-TheViolentColdWarBlackOpContinuesToday-2013

Delve into the forbidden history of once-hidden programs of terror and public manipulation, born after World War 2 and continuing – almost unchanged – to the present day. This affects your life from behind the scenes right now.

The BBC documentary referred to in this video has been recovered, will be linked here soon.

Gladio – Behind False Flag Terrorism

More on how this impacts your life today:

FALSE FLAG

Secret History – Khazarian (Israeli) False-Flag Terrorism – Documentary

The Sandy Hook False-Flag 2012 Murders – The Evidence Mounts

Eric Holder and the FBI’s ‘Patriot Conspiracy’ (PATCON) False-Flag Terror Program – 2011 Interview

The ‘Batman Massacre’ Has Hallmarks of A False Flag – Author Fritz Springmeier

PATCON (FBI Anti-Patriot False Flag Terrorism) Research Pack, v1

Adam Lanza / Sandy Hook Staged Massacre – Mysteries, Fakery, and Similarities to Other False Flag Events

The Sandy Hook Coverup — Full Movie

Terror Storm – Full Movie – Special Edition Re-Mastered with Extra Features – in HD

Sourcery of Sandy Hook

Revealed – An FBI Agent Armed the Black Panthers

The Terror Within – Former DHS Officer Julia Davis Speaks Out – The Real Purpose of ‘War on Terror’ IS Terror

dhs whistleblower julia

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/9860

The strategy of tension: A tactic to divide, manipulate and control people

 

The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) in any language, even as reported by Wikipedia in an article dotted with claims for documentation that appear to be distractions, is a tactic that aims to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateur, and false flag terrorist actions. Sound like today’s news? It’s not. But it does have an inglorious tradition that goes back to the CIA-supported, neofascist movement, Operation Gladio, post World War II.

The observation of the strategy of tension began with accusations that the United States government and the Greek military junta of 1967–1974 supported far-right terrorist groups in Italy and Turkey, where communism was growing in popularity, to spread panic among the population who would, in turn, demand stronger and more dictatorial governments.

Is it not like President Obama’s (NDAA) National Defense Appropriation Act, in which he includes the right for the military to indefinitely detain people affiliated with “terrorism,” including American citizens, without proof or legal representation or a trial? It even includes the right to kill any person associated with terrorists. Yes, the strategy of tension is an old terror chestnut brought back to frighten the liberal left citizens challenging right-wing power and actions.

The term “Strategy of tension” recurred during the trials that followed in the 1970s and 1980s Years of Lead ( “anni di piombo”), during which terror attacks and assassinations were committed by apparently neofascist terrorists (with such names as Ordine Nuovo, Avanguardia Nazionale or Fronte Nazionale), reeking with Italian patriotism.

In reality, it was primarily members and international supporters of the Italian Communist Party who invented and popularized the term “strategy of tension”. They meant to draw attention to the crimes of the Italian Right and far-right parties who were allegedly supported by the foreign belligerents. Again, these tragedies are not unlike the invocation of terrorist acts like Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon and the Aurora bomber—all designed to instill fear and a desire for more protection?

“The strategy of tension” grew out of the post-WW II Operation Gladio, Italy’s branch of the secret pre-positioned NATOstay-behind” armies of Western Europe. These armies were set up to perform resistance, partisan, and guerrilla activities in the event of Soviet invasion; equivalent units were set up by other NATO members in their states. It is claimed that Gladio units were engaged in destabilization at the behest of the United States and other Western governments, intelligence agencies (e.g., the CIA), the P2 Masonic lodge, the Order of the Solar Temple, various church-related organizations, and domestic influences such as organized crime.

This is all verifiable history, like the creation today of a paramilitary controlled surveillance society, which prides itself on more and more protection, even total domination as in martiall law put into effect in Boston when bad things went bad with the Boston Marathon. In fact, there is a likely probability that Craft International, a mercenary company like Xe or Blackwell SF, which the CIA uses with impunity, was largely responsible. It is the premier technique of right-wing false-flag operatives.

Back in post-WWII days, the claims were backed by judicial proof which established that European fascist dictatorships of the time (the Greek junta and the secret services of Francisco Franco) were heavily involved in supporting and arming Italian neo-fascist and neo-nazi groups, such as Ordine Nuovo and Avanguardia Nazionale.

In this case it was assassinations, as Avanguardia Nazionale hitman Pierluigi Concutelli used an Ingram MAC-10 SMG to assassinate magistrate Vittorio Occorsio in the 1970s. It has been proven that Avanguardia Nazionale secured the weapon from the CIA via Francoist Spain. General Gianadelio Maletti, commander of the counter-intelligence section of the Italian military intelligence service from 1971 to 1975, stated that his men in the region of Venice discovered a right-wing terrorist cell that was supplied military explosives from Germany, and he alleged that US intelligence services instigated and abetted right-wing terrorism in Italy during the 1970s.

Carlo Digilio, an Italian neofascist, code named “Uncle Otto,” coordinated CIA activities in the Italian regions of Veneto and Friuli from the 1960s to the 1970s, recruiting former fascists to serve the NATO and U.S. interests in Italy. He himself had been recruited in Verona by U.S. Navy Captain David Carrett.

These groups began to pursue an ostensibly extreme right-wing anti-communist agenda using violent means, including false flag bombings that were then blamed on extra-parliamentary left-wing militant organizations, to discredit the political Left, in general, at a time in Italy when the Italian Communist Party was very close to becoming the majority in the government. Today, we can substitute the word “terrorist” for Communist, yesterday’s boogeyman.

It should be noted that the actions carried out by these extreme groups were meant primarily to agitate and control public opinion, creating fears about the Communist Party. At the time, they created massive public concern and widespread paranoia. According to the “strategia della tensione” theory, this was de rigeur.

Examples of such actions include the 1972 Peteano bombing, long thought to have been carried out by the Red Brigades, but for which the neofascist terrorist Vincenzo Vinciguerra has been imprisoned, the attempted assassination of former Interior Minister Mariano Rumor on 17 May 1973 or the Bologna railway station bombing known as the Bologna massacre of 1980.

Today, we can look back to 9/11/2001 for the starting point of a more contemporary “strategy of tension” that endures until this day, and is used internationally by the US government and its allies for regime change, assassinations, hit lists, drone-bombings and the like.

The Guardian (UK), in an article published on June 24, 2000, reported that the parliamentarians of the Left Democrats, wrote a report to a subcommittee of the Italian Parliament about what they viewed as United States support for ‘anti-left terror in Italy’, and the activities of Gladio.

The report by the Left Democrats claimed that the aim of this alleged support for Gladio was to make the public think that the bombings were committed by a communist [sic terrorist] insurgency, to promote the formation of an authoritarian government, and to prevent the Italian Communist Party (PCI) from joining the ruling Democrazia Cristiana (DC) in a national unity government (the “Historic Compromise” between Aldo Moro (who was subsequently assassinated) and Enrico Berlinguer, respective leaders of the DC and of the PCI).

An astonishing observation of the terrorism in Italy that was blamed on communists is that it coincided with election victories for the communists at the polls. So as the PCI was gaining popular support, the number of civilian-targeted bombings, random knee-cappings, and high-profile kidnappings blamed on communist terrorists increased markedly.

Furthermore, starting with the 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing and the 1972 Peteano attack, several bombings carried out by the far-right were at first blamed on anarchists (for the first one) and, for the second one, on the Red Brigades (BR)—although it was later found that neofascists, such as Vincenzo Vinciguerra, had organized them. Piazza Fontana’s bombing, in December 1969, marked the beginning of the “strategia della tensione,” which ended around the time of the Bologna railway station bombing in 1980. Post 9/11, there were train bombings in Madrid in 2004 and on July 7, 2005 in London’s subway bombing, the latter backed by MI6.

The report from the Left Democrats of Italy to a subcommittee of the Italian Parliament apparently concluded that the strategy of tension followed by Gladio had been supported by the United States to “stop the PCI, and, to a certain degree, also the PSI from reaching executive power in the country”.

Members of the Democratic Party of the Left (PDS), part of the Commission on Terrorism headed by Senator Giovanni Pellegrino and created in 1988, also described the Italian peninsula since the end of World War II as a “country with ‘limited sovereignty’” and as an “American colony”

The centrist Italian Republican party described the claims as worthy of a 1970s Maoist group. Aldo Giannuli, a historian who works as a consultant to the parliamentary terrorism commission, sees the release of the Left Democrats’ report as a maneuver dictated primarily by domestic political considerations. “Since they have been in power, the Left Democrats have given us very little help in gaining access to security service archives,” he said. “This is a falsely courageous report.”

The existence of US Army Field Manual 30–31B lends even more credibility to the accusations that the CIA tried to destabilize democratic nations to foster U.S. interests. The United States maintains that such a manual is a forgery and has found Soviet defectors willing to testify that it was put together by the KGB. However Licio Gelli, grand master of the P2 Masonic Lodge involved in all of the murkiest and bloodiest episodes of the “strategy of tension,” repeated openly and bluntly (for example, to BBC journalist Allan Francovich) to have received his copy directly from the hands of CIA men.

Piazza Fontana bombing

In December 1969, four bombs struck Rome’s Monument of Vittorio Emanuele II (Altare della Patria), the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, Milan’s Banca Commerciale and the Banca Nazionale dell’Agricoltura. The later attack, known as the Piazza Fontana bombing of 12 December 1969, killed 16 and injured 90, marking the beginning of this violent period.

Giuseppe Pinelli, a young anarchist, was interrogated about the crime, and died in police custody. After his suspicious death, which was claimed to be suicide by the authorities, investigator Luigi Calabresi came under violent criticism from the left and many intellectuals, considering him the person responsible for Pinelli’s death; Calabresi would be murdered two and a half years later. Think of ex-FBI terror chief John O’Neil, killed on his first day of work in the WTC, after resigning from the FBI.

Think about the Reichstag bombing. The paradigm for that act, in which several communists were accused, included the main “suspect” who was mentally ill and was sentenced to be decapitated and his several cronies hanged. Yet, it was Goering who orchestrated the fire. Think about the Oklahoma bombings, another false-flag attack blamed on domestic terrorists.

Think of the World Trade Center bombing of Tower 1 in 1993, blamed on the blind Sheik Rahman when it was the FBI who engineered the event. Think about 9/11/2001 and the fact that NORAD, flying exercises on the Northeast seaboard was not available to get a plane in the air to defend New York City. Then NORAD blamed the tragedy on 19 Muslim terrorists. More likely it was the Israeli Mossad, who stood most to gain.

In 1997, the courts condemned Leonardo Marino and Ovidio Bompressi for carrying out Piazza Fontana bombing, and Adriano Sofri and Giorgio Pietrostefani for ordering it. At the time of the murder, all four belonged to the extreme left-wing group Lotta Continua. After Pinelli, the police investigated another anarchist, Pietro Valpreda. He quickly became a hero to the left, who perceived him to be a victim of a plot to attribute a fascist bombing to the left. The leftist environment produced an investigative book, La strage di Stato (“The state massacre”), in which they claimed the state was attacking anarchists because they (by definition) could not have a political party to defend them, as communists would have had.

Neo-fascist terrorist Stefano Delle Chiaie was then arrested in Caracas, Venezuela, in 1989 and rendered to Italy to stand trial for his role. Delle Chiaie was however acquitted by the Assise Court in Catanzaro in 1989, along with fellow accused Massimiliano Fachini.

Think of the true culprits behind the 9/11 attack, NORAD and the Israeli Mossad, who have successfully laid the blame on Muslim terrorists.

In 1998, David Carrett, a U.S. Navy captain, was indicted by a Milanese magistrate, Guido Salvini, on charges of political and military espionage and his participation in the 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing, among other events. Judge Guido Salvini also opened a case against Sergio Minetto, an Italian official for the US-NATO intelligence network, and pentito Carlo Digilio. La Repubblica underlined that Carlo Rocchi, the CIA’s man in Milan, was surprised in 1995 searching for information concerning Operation Gladio, thus demonstrating that all was not over.

A June 20, 2001, conviction of Italian Neo-fascists Carlo Maria Maggi, Delfo Zorzi and Giancarlo Rognoni was overturned in March 2004. Carlo Digilio, a suspected CIA informant, received immunity from prosecution by becoming a witness for the state (in agreement with the pentiti laws). All were declared not guilty.

According to extreme right-wing Ordine Nuovo member Vincenzo Vinciguerra, “The December 1969 explosion was supposed to be the detonator which would have convinced the political and military authorities to declare a state of emergency.” Does it sound familiar, followers of Sandy Hook and the Boston Massacre?

The first judicial investigation concerning the 1974 Piazza della Loggia bombing led to the condemnation in 1979 of a member of the Brescian far-right movement. However, this first sentence was canceled in 1983 and the suspect absolved in 1985 by the Court of Cassation. A second investigation led to the accusation of another far-right activist, who was thereafter absolved in 1989 because of insufficient proof.

A third investigation is still in active. On May 19, 2005, the Court of Cassation confirmed the arrest warrant against Delfo Zorzi, a former member of the Ordine Nuovo neo-fascist group, who was also suspected of being the material executor of the 1969 Piazza Fontana bombing. Alongside Delfo Zorzi, his neo-fascist comrades Carlo Maria Maggi and Maurizio Tramonte, all members of the Ordine Nuovo group founded in 1956 by Pino Rauti, are also suspected of having organized the Piazza della Loggia bombing.

Bologna railway bombing, August 2, 1980

The Bologna railway bombing killed 85 persons and injured 200. A long, troubled and controversial court case and political issue ensued. The relatives of the victims formed an association (Association tra i famigliari delle vittime della strage alla stazione di Bologna del 2 agosto 1980) to raise and maintain civil awareness on the Bologna massacre. On 23 November 1995 the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) upheld the sentences of the second appeals court:

Role of Italian intelligence services

In 1974, Vito Miceli, P2 member, chief of the SIOS (Servizio Informazioni), Army Intelligence’s Service from 1969 and SID‘s head from 1970 to 1974, was arrested on charges of “conspiracy against the state” concerning investigations about Rosa dei venti, a state-infiltrated group involved in terrorist acts. In 1977, the secret services were reorganized in a democratic attempt. With law #801 of 24/10/1977, SID was divided into SISMI (Servizio per le Informazioni e la Sicurezza Militare), SISDE (Servizio per le Informazioni e la Sicurezza Democratica) and CESIS (Comitato Esecutivo per i Servizi di Informazione e Sicurezza). The CESIS had a coordination role, led by the President of Council.

It was a very simple strategy: Bombs were built by chemistry students, some of them were optimistic and believed that they could bring freedom to their colleagues in Yugoslavia and Romania. Other people were pessimistic and believed that the leadership would be replaced by people more loyal to Moscow, after which would come what Senator Giulio Andreotti has called “the great silence”.

Counter-Guerrilla

Turkey has a history of involvement in similar plots. The Turkish branch of Gladio, known as Counter-Guerrilla, allegedly followed a similar strategy in order to justify the 1980 military coup. Turkish secret police are also believed to have instigated the bombing of the Turkish consulate in Thessaloniki, Greece in 1955, leading to the Istanbul Pogrom against the Greek minority of Istanbul. Today, the Turkish government has exploded in violent response to gatherings of Turkish people in an Istanbul park to protest Prime Minster Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s intended destruction of the park to build a shopping mall. Erdoğan has condemned the protestors as rebels wanting to destroy the country.

On and on it goes, the “strategy of tension” in the U.S. and around the world, using tactics that aim to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, and false flag terrorist actions. It also points to a universal conspiracy of the right to run these techniques in any country in the world that has a democratic or left-leaning government. And that definitely is not just yesterday’s news? That is the future unless we change it.

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer and life-long resident of New York City. An EBook version of his book of poems “State Of Shock,” on 9/11 and its after effects is now available at Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com. He has also written hundreds of articles on politics and government as Associate Editor of Intrepid Report (formerly Online Journal). Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.

– See more at: http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/9860#sthash.wk6O9z3s.dpuf

 

%d bloggers like this: